Cargando…
The efficacy of a preparatory phase of a touch-based approach in treating chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Massage therapy is an important element of rehabilitation in the treatment of chronic low back pain (CLBP). The objective of this study was to determine the relative efficacy of massage therapy between traditional massage and a new massage approach for CLBP. We also examined whether any...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5404807/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28461765 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S129313 |
_version_ | 1783231653757321216 |
---|---|
author | Zangrando, Federico Piccinini, Giulia Tagliolini, Clara Marsilli, Gabriella Iosa, Marco Vulpiani, Maria Chiara Paolucci, Teresa |
author_facet | Zangrando, Federico Piccinini, Giulia Tagliolini, Clara Marsilli, Gabriella Iosa, Marco Vulpiani, Maria Chiara Paolucci, Teresa |
author_sort | Zangrando, Federico |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Massage therapy is an important element of rehabilitation in the treatment of chronic low back pain (CLBP). The objective of this study was to determine the relative efficacy of massage therapy between traditional massage and a new massage approach for CLBP. We also examined whether any reduction in pain was linked to interoceptive awareness and parasympathetic activation. METHODS: A single-blind, randomized, controlled trial of 51 patients who were allocated into a traditional massage therapy group (TMG; N=24, mean age: 50.54±9.13 years) or experimental massage therapy group (SMG; N=27, mean age: 50.77±6.80 years). The primary outcome was the reduction in pain per the visual analog scale (VAS); the secondary outcome measures were multidimensional pain intensity on the McGill Pain Questionnaire, pain-related disability per the Waddel Disability Index, interoceptive awareness per the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness Questionnaire, quality of life per the Short Form - 12 Health Survey, and heart rate variability, expressed as the coherence ratio (CR) by photoplethysmography. The following outcome measures were assessed at baseline, at the end of the treatment program, and at the 3-month follow-up. The mean and standard deviation were calculated for continuous data. Mann–Whitney U test was used to perform between-group comparisons, Friedman’s analysis was used for data on the 3 assessment times in each group, and Spearman’s R coefficient was used to analyze correlations. RESULTS: Both approaches had a positive result on pain, an effect that was more acute in the SMG versus TMG for all pain scales, with better maintenance at the 3-month follow-up (VAS p=0.005 and p=0.098; Waddell Index p=0.034 and 0.044; McGill total p=0.000 and 0.003). In the SMG, CR scores were significant at baseline and at the end of the treatment program (p=0.000 and 0.002). CONCLUSION: The new massage approach with a preparatory phase that is pleasant to the touch was more effective than the traditional approach for CLBP. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5404807 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54048072017-05-01 The efficacy of a preparatory phase of a touch-based approach in treating chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial Zangrando, Federico Piccinini, Giulia Tagliolini, Clara Marsilli, Gabriella Iosa, Marco Vulpiani, Maria Chiara Paolucci, Teresa J Pain Res Original Research BACKGROUND: Massage therapy is an important element of rehabilitation in the treatment of chronic low back pain (CLBP). The objective of this study was to determine the relative efficacy of massage therapy between traditional massage and a new massage approach for CLBP. We also examined whether any reduction in pain was linked to interoceptive awareness and parasympathetic activation. METHODS: A single-blind, randomized, controlled trial of 51 patients who were allocated into a traditional massage therapy group (TMG; N=24, mean age: 50.54±9.13 years) or experimental massage therapy group (SMG; N=27, mean age: 50.77±6.80 years). The primary outcome was the reduction in pain per the visual analog scale (VAS); the secondary outcome measures were multidimensional pain intensity on the McGill Pain Questionnaire, pain-related disability per the Waddel Disability Index, interoceptive awareness per the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness Questionnaire, quality of life per the Short Form - 12 Health Survey, and heart rate variability, expressed as the coherence ratio (CR) by photoplethysmography. The following outcome measures were assessed at baseline, at the end of the treatment program, and at the 3-month follow-up. The mean and standard deviation were calculated for continuous data. Mann–Whitney U test was used to perform between-group comparisons, Friedman’s analysis was used for data on the 3 assessment times in each group, and Spearman’s R coefficient was used to analyze correlations. RESULTS: Both approaches had a positive result on pain, an effect that was more acute in the SMG versus TMG for all pain scales, with better maintenance at the 3-month follow-up (VAS p=0.005 and p=0.098; Waddell Index p=0.034 and 0.044; McGill total p=0.000 and 0.003). In the SMG, CR scores were significant at baseline and at the end of the treatment program (p=0.000 and 0.002). CONCLUSION: The new massage approach with a preparatory phase that is pleasant to the touch was more effective than the traditional approach for CLBP. Dove Medical Press 2017-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5404807/ /pubmed/28461765 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S129313 Text en © 2017 Zangrando et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Zangrando, Federico Piccinini, Giulia Tagliolini, Clara Marsilli, Gabriella Iosa, Marco Vulpiani, Maria Chiara Paolucci, Teresa The efficacy of a preparatory phase of a touch-based approach in treating chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial |
title | The efficacy of a preparatory phase of a touch-based approach in treating chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | The efficacy of a preparatory phase of a touch-based approach in treating chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | The efficacy of a preparatory phase of a touch-based approach in treating chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | The efficacy of a preparatory phase of a touch-based approach in treating chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | The efficacy of a preparatory phase of a touch-based approach in treating chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | efficacy of a preparatory phase of a touch-based approach in treating chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5404807/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28461765 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S129313 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zangrandofederico theefficacyofapreparatoryphaseofatouchbasedapproachintreatingchroniclowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT piccininigiulia theefficacyofapreparatoryphaseofatouchbasedapproachintreatingchroniclowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT taglioliniclara theefficacyofapreparatoryphaseofatouchbasedapproachintreatingchroniclowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT marsilligabriella theefficacyofapreparatoryphaseofatouchbasedapproachintreatingchroniclowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT iosamarco theefficacyofapreparatoryphaseofatouchbasedapproachintreatingchroniclowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vulpianimariachiara theefficacyofapreparatoryphaseofatouchbasedapproachintreatingchroniclowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT paolucciteresa theefficacyofapreparatoryphaseofatouchbasedapproachintreatingchroniclowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT zangrandofederico efficacyofapreparatoryphaseofatouchbasedapproachintreatingchroniclowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT piccininigiulia efficacyofapreparatoryphaseofatouchbasedapproachintreatingchroniclowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT taglioliniclara efficacyofapreparatoryphaseofatouchbasedapproachintreatingchroniclowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT marsilligabriella efficacyofapreparatoryphaseofatouchbasedapproachintreatingchroniclowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT iosamarco efficacyofapreparatoryphaseofatouchbasedapproachintreatingchroniclowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vulpianimariachiara efficacyofapreparatoryphaseofatouchbasedapproachintreatingchroniclowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT paolucciteresa efficacyofapreparatoryphaseofatouchbasedapproachintreatingchroniclowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial |