Cargando…

The efficacy of a preparatory phase of a touch-based approach in treating chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Massage therapy is an important element of rehabilitation in the treatment of chronic low back pain (CLBP). The objective of this study was to determine the relative efficacy of massage therapy between traditional massage and a new massage approach for CLBP. We also examined whether any...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zangrando, Federico, Piccinini, Giulia, Tagliolini, Clara, Marsilli, Gabriella, Iosa, Marco, Vulpiani, Maria Chiara, Paolucci, Teresa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5404807/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28461765
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S129313
_version_ 1783231653757321216
author Zangrando, Federico
Piccinini, Giulia
Tagliolini, Clara
Marsilli, Gabriella
Iosa, Marco
Vulpiani, Maria Chiara
Paolucci, Teresa
author_facet Zangrando, Federico
Piccinini, Giulia
Tagliolini, Clara
Marsilli, Gabriella
Iosa, Marco
Vulpiani, Maria Chiara
Paolucci, Teresa
author_sort Zangrando, Federico
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Massage therapy is an important element of rehabilitation in the treatment of chronic low back pain (CLBP). The objective of this study was to determine the relative efficacy of massage therapy between traditional massage and a new massage approach for CLBP. We also examined whether any reduction in pain was linked to interoceptive awareness and parasympathetic activation. METHODS: A single-blind, randomized, controlled trial of 51 patients who were allocated into a traditional massage therapy group (TMG; N=24, mean age: 50.54±9.13 years) or experimental massage therapy group (SMG; N=27, mean age: 50.77±6.80 years). The primary outcome was the reduction in pain per the visual analog scale (VAS); the secondary outcome measures were multidimensional pain intensity on the McGill Pain Questionnaire, pain-related disability per the Waddel Disability Index, interoceptive awareness per the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness Questionnaire, quality of life per the Short Form - 12 Health Survey, and heart rate variability, expressed as the coherence ratio (CR) by photoplethysmography. The following outcome measures were assessed at baseline, at the end of the treatment program, and at the 3-month follow-up. The mean and standard deviation were calculated for continuous data. Mann–Whitney U test was used to perform between-group comparisons, Friedman’s analysis was used for data on the 3 assessment times in each group, and Spearman’s R coefficient was used to analyze correlations. RESULTS: Both approaches had a positive result on pain, an effect that was more acute in the SMG versus TMG for all pain scales, with better maintenance at the 3-month follow-up (VAS p=0.005 and p=0.098; Waddell Index p=0.034 and 0.044; McGill total p=0.000 and 0.003). In the SMG, CR scores were significant at baseline and at the end of the treatment program (p=0.000 and 0.002). CONCLUSION: The new massage approach with a preparatory phase that is pleasant to the touch was more effective than the traditional approach for CLBP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5404807
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54048072017-05-01 The efficacy of a preparatory phase of a touch-based approach in treating chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial Zangrando, Federico Piccinini, Giulia Tagliolini, Clara Marsilli, Gabriella Iosa, Marco Vulpiani, Maria Chiara Paolucci, Teresa J Pain Res Original Research BACKGROUND: Massage therapy is an important element of rehabilitation in the treatment of chronic low back pain (CLBP). The objective of this study was to determine the relative efficacy of massage therapy between traditional massage and a new massage approach for CLBP. We also examined whether any reduction in pain was linked to interoceptive awareness and parasympathetic activation. METHODS: A single-blind, randomized, controlled trial of 51 patients who were allocated into a traditional massage therapy group (TMG; N=24, mean age: 50.54±9.13 years) or experimental massage therapy group (SMG; N=27, mean age: 50.77±6.80 years). The primary outcome was the reduction in pain per the visual analog scale (VAS); the secondary outcome measures were multidimensional pain intensity on the McGill Pain Questionnaire, pain-related disability per the Waddel Disability Index, interoceptive awareness per the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness Questionnaire, quality of life per the Short Form - 12 Health Survey, and heart rate variability, expressed as the coherence ratio (CR) by photoplethysmography. The following outcome measures were assessed at baseline, at the end of the treatment program, and at the 3-month follow-up. The mean and standard deviation were calculated for continuous data. Mann–Whitney U test was used to perform between-group comparisons, Friedman’s analysis was used for data on the 3 assessment times in each group, and Spearman’s R coefficient was used to analyze correlations. RESULTS: Both approaches had a positive result on pain, an effect that was more acute in the SMG versus TMG for all pain scales, with better maintenance at the 3-month follow-up (VAS p=0.005 and p=0.098; Waddell Index p=0.034 and 0.044; McGill total p=0.000 and 0.003). In the SMG, CR scores were significant at baseline and at the end of the treatment program (p=0.000 and 0.002). CONCLUSION: The new massage approach with a preparatory phase that is pleasant to the touch was more effective than the traditional approach for CLBP. Dove Medical Press 2017-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5404807/ /pubmed/28461765 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S129313 Text en © 2017 Zangrando et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Zangrando, Federico
Piccinini, Giulia
Tagliolini, Clara
Marsilli, Gabriella
Iosa, Marco
Vulpiani, Maria Chiara
Paolucci, Teresa
The efficacy of a preparatory phase of a touch-based approach in treating chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial
title The efficacy of a preparatory phase of a touch-based approach in treating chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial
title_full The efficacy of a preparatory phase of a touch-based approach in treating chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr The efficacy of a preparatory phase of a touch-based approach in treating chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed The efficacy of a preparatory phase of a touch-based approach in treating chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial
title_short The efficacy of a preparatory phase of a touch-based approach in treating chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort efficacy of a preparatory phase of a touch-based approach in treating chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5404807/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28461765
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S129313
work_keys_str_mv AT zangrandofederico theefficacyofapreparatoryphaseofatouchbasedapproachintreatingchroniclowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT piccininigiulia theefficacyofapreparatoryphaseofatouchbasedapproachintreatingchroniclowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT taglioliniclara theefficacyofapreparatoryphaseofatouchbasedapproachintreatingchroniclowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT marsilligabriella theefficacyofapreparatoryphaseofatouchbasedapproachintreatingchroniclowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT iosamarco theefficacyofapreparatoryphaseofatouchbasedapproachintreatingchroniclowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vulpianimariachiara theefficacyofapreparatoryphaseofatouchbasedapproachintreatingchroniclowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT paolucciteresa theefficacyofapreparatoryphaseofatouchbasedapproachintreatingchroniclowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT zangrandofederico efficacyofapreparatoryphaseofatouchbasedapproachintreatingchroniclowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT piccininigiulia efficacyofapreparatoryphaseofatouchbasedapproachintreatingchroniclowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT taglioliniclara efficacyofapreparatoryphaseofatouchbasedapproachintreatingchroniclowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT marsilligabriella efficacyofapreparatoryphaseofatouchbasedapproachintreatingchroniclowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT iosamarco efficacyofapreparatoryphaseofatouchbasedapproachintreatingchroniclowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vulpianimariachiara efficacyofapreparatoryphaseofatouchbasedapproachintreatingchroniclowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT paolucciteresa efficacyofapreparatoryphaseofatouchbasedapproachintreatingchroniclowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial