Cargando…

Relationship between acromial morphological variation and subacromial impingement: A three-dimensional analysis

Purpose: To evaluate the association of acromial morphology and subacromial impingement. Methods: Bilateral shoulder computed tomography was performed in 138 patients who received shoulder arthroscopy. Measured parameters included: acromial tilt (AT), modified acromial tilt (mAT), acromial slope (AS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Xinyu, Xu, Wei, Hu, Ning, Liang, Xi, Huang, Wei, Jiang, Dianming, Chen, Hong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5404845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28441418
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176193
_version_ 1783231659032707072
author Li, Xinyu
Xu, Wei
Hu, Ning
Liang, Xi
Huang, Wei
Jiang, Dianming
Chen, Hong
author_facet Li, Xinyu
Xu, Wei
Hu, Ning
Liang, Xi
Huang, Wei
Jiang, Dianming
Chen, Hong
author_sort Li, Xinyu
collection PubMed
description Purpose: To evaluate the association of acromial morphology and subacromial impingement. Methods: Bilateral shoulder computed tomography was performed in 138 patients who received shoulder arthroscopy. Measured parameters included: acromial tilt (AT), modified acromial tilt (mAT), acromial slope (AS), acromiohumeral interval (AHI), lateral acromial angle (LAA), acromial index (AI), critical shoulder angle (CSA), acromial anterior protrusion (AAP), and acromial inferior protrusion (AIP). Acromial morphological characteristics were compared between groups. Side-to-side differences were assessed between affected and non-affected shoulders. Intra- and inter-observer agreements for each parameter were calculated. Results: AT (25.90 vs. 29.41°), mAT (18.88 vs. 22.64°), and AHI (5.46 vs. 6.47 mm) were significantly smaller in impinged patients. The impingement group demonstrated significantly larger AI (63.50 vs. 59.84%), CSA (31.78 vs. 28.74°), AAP (7.13 vs. 5.32 mm), and AIP (5.51 vs. 4.04 mm). Regarding side-to-side comparison, the acromial morphology was significantly different between the affected and non-affected shoulders in impinged patients, while the difference was slight and insignificant in control patients. All, except AS and LAA, measured parameters demonstrated good intra- and inter-observer agreements. Conclusions: Three-dimensional reconstructed CT scan is a reliable method to measure shoulder morphology. The acromial morphological variation is related with sub acromial impingement, however, the causal relationship of them should be further explored.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5404845
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54048452017-05-12 Relationship between acromial morphological variation and subacromial impingement: A three-dimensional analysis Li, Xinyu Xu, Wei Hu, Ning Liang, Xi Huang, Wei Jiang, Dianming Chen, Hong PLoS One Research Article Purpose: To evaluate the association of acromial morphology and subacromial impingement. Methods: Bilateral shoulder computed tomography was performed in 138 patients who received shoulder arthroscopy. Measured parameters included: acromial tilt (AT), modified acromial tilt (mAT), acromial slope (AS), acromiohumeral interval (AHI), lateral acromial angle (LAA), acromial index (AI), critical shoulder angle (CSA), acromial anterior protrusion (AAP), and acromial inferior protrusion (AIP). Acromial morphological characteristics were compared between groups. Side-to-side differences were assessed between affected and non-affected shoulders. Intra- and inter-observer agreements for each parameter were calculated. Results: AT (25.90 vs. 29.41°), mAT (18.88 vs. 22.64°), and AHI (5.46 vs. 6.47 mm) were significantly smaller in impinged patients. The impingement group demonstrated significantly larger AI (63.50 vs. 59.84%), CSA (31.78 vs. 28.74°), AAP (7.13 vs. 5.32 mm), and AIP (5.51 vs. 4.04 mm). Regarding side-to-side comparison, the acromial morphology was significantly different between the affected and non-affected shoulders in impinged patients, while the difference was slight and insignificant in control patients. All, except AS and LAA, measured parameters demonstrated good intra- and inter-observer agreements. Conclusions: Three-dimensional reconstructed CT scan is a reliable method to measure shoulder morphology. The acromial morphological variation is related with sub acromial impingement, however, the causal relationship of them should be further explored. Public Library of Science 2017-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5404845/ /pubmed/28441418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176193 Text en © 2017 Li et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Li, Xinyu
Xu, Wei
Hu, Ning
Liang, Xi
Huang, Wei
Jiang, Dianming
Chen, Hong
Relationship between acromial morphological variation and subacromial impingement: A three-dimensional analysis
title Relationship between acromial morphological variation and subacromial impingement: A three-dimensional analysis
title_full Relationship between acromial morphological variation and subacromial impingement: A three-dimensional analysis
title_fullStr Relationship between acromial morphological variation and subacromial impingement: A three-dimensional analysis
title_full_unstemmed Relationship between acromial morphological variation and subacromial impingement: A three-dimensional analysis
title_short Relationship between acromial morphological variation and subacromial impingement: A three-dimensional analysis
title_sort relationship between acromial morphological variation and subacromial impingement: a three-dimensional analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5404845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28441418
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176193
work_keys_str_mv AT lixinyu relationshipbetweenacromialmorphologicalvariationandsubacromialimpingementathreedimensionalanalysis
AT xuwei relationshipbetweenacromialmorphologicalvariationandsubacromialimpingementathreedimensionalanalysis
AT huning relationshipbetweenacromialmorphologicalvariationandsubacromialimpingementathreedimensionalanalysis
AT liangxi relationshipbetweenacromialmorphologicalvariationandsubacromialimpingementathreedimensionalanalysis
AT huangwei relationshipbetweenacromialmorphologicalvariationandsubacromialimpingementathreedimensionalanalysis
AT jiangdianming relationshipbetweenacromialmorphologicalvariationandsubacromialimpingementathreedimensionalanalysis
AT chenhong relationshipbetweenacromialmorphologicalvariationandsubacromialimpingementathreedimensionalanalysis