Cargando…

Innovative Approaches to Weight Loss in a High Risk Population: The Small Changes and Lasting Effects (SCALE) Trial

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of a small change behavioral weight loss intervention with or without a positive affect/self-affirmation (PA/SA) component on weight loss at 12 months. METHODS: Black and Hispanic adults (N=405) with body mass index 25-50 kg/m(2) selected one of 10 small change ea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Phillips, Erica G., Charlson, Mary, Wells, Martin T., Winston, Ginger, Ramos, Rosio, Devine, Carol M., Wethington, Elaine, Peterson, Janey C., Wansink, Brian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5404988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28382755
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/oby.21780
_version_ 1783231681321238528
author Phillips, Erica G.
Charlson, Mary
Wells, Martin T.
Winston, Ginger
Ramos, Rosio
Devine, Carol M.
Wethington, Elaine
Peterson, Janey C.
Wansink, Brian
author_facet Phillips, Erica G.
Charlson, Mary
Wells, Martin T.
Winston, Ginger
Ramos, Rosio
Devine, Carol M.
Wethington, Elaine
Peterson, Janey C.
Wansink, Brian
author_sort Phillips, Erica G.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of a small change behavioral weight loss intervention with or without a positive affect/self-affirmation (PA/SA) component on weight loss at 12 months. METHODS: Black and Hispanic adults (N=405) with body mass index 25-50 kg/m(2) selected one of 10 small change eating strategies and a physical activity goal, randomly with/without positive affect/self-affirmation. Participants were followed by community health workers (CHW's) at set intervals (weekly months 1-3; biweekly months 4-9; once monthly months 10-12). RESULTS: There was no difference in weight loss at 12 months between participants in the small change approach alone (1.1%) vs. the small change PA/SA intervention (1.2%). During treatment, 9% of participants lost at least 7% of their initial body weight. Participants who reported more interval life events had a lower likelihood of losing weight (p <.0001). However, those randomized to the small change PA/SA intervention gained less weight (+0.3% vs. 2.3% gain; P value <.0001). CONCLUSION: The small change PA/SA intervention did not lead to a significant difference in weight loss in comparison to the small change approach alone. It did however decrease the negative impact of psychosocial stressors on weight gain among participants with more interval life events.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5404988
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54049882017-10-05 Innovative Approaches to Weight Loss in a High Risk Population: The Small Changes and Lasting Effects (SCALE) Trial Phillips, Erica G. Charlson, Mary Wells, Martin T. Winston, Ginger Ramos, Rosio Devine, Carol M. Wethington, Elaine Peterson, Janey C. Wansink, Brian Obesity (Silver Spring) Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of a small change behavioral weight loss intervention with or without a positive affect/self-affirmation (PA/SA) component on weight loss at 12 months. METHODS: Black and Hispanic adults (N=405) with body mass index 25-50 kg/m(2) selected one of 10 small change eating strategies and a physical activity goal, randomly with/without positive affect/self-affirmation. Participants were followed by community health workers (CHW's) at set intervals (weekly months 1-3; biweekly months 4-9; once monthly months 10-12). RESULTS: There was no difference in weight loss at 12 months between participants in the small change approach alone (1.1%) vs. the small change PA/SA intervention (1.2%). During treatment, 9% of participants lost at least 7% of their initial body weight. Participants who reported more interval life events had a lower likelihood of losing weight (p <.0001). However, those randomized to the small change PA/SA intervention gained less weight (+0.3% vs. 2.3% gain; P value <.0001). CONCLUSION: The small change PA/SA intervention did not lead to a significant difference in weight loss in comparison to the small change approach alone. It did however decrease the negative impact of psychosocial stressors on weight gain among participants with more interval life events. 2017-04-05 2017-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5404988/ /pubmed/28382755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/oby.21780 Text en http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use:http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms
spellingShingle Article
Phillips, Erica G.
Charlson, Mary
Wells, Martin T.
Winston, Ginger
Ramos, Rosio
Devine, Carol M.
Wethington, Elaine
Peterson, Janey C.
Wansink, Brian
Innovative Approaches to Weight Loss in a High Risk Population: The Small Changes and Lasting Effects (SCALE) Trial
title Innovative Approaches to Weight Loss in a High Risk Population: The Small Changes and Lasting Effects (SCALE) Trial
title_full Innovative Approaches to Weight Loss in a High Risk Population: The Small Changes and Lasting Effects (SCALE) Trial
title_fullStr Innovative Approaches to Weight Loss in a High Risk Population: The Small Changes and Lasting Effects (SCALE) Trial
title_full_unstemmed Innovative Approaches to Weight Loss in a High Risk Population: The Small Changes and Lasting Effects (SCALE) Trial
title_short Innovative Approaches to Weight Loss in a High Risk Population: The Small Changes and Lasting Effects (SCALE) Trial
title_sort innovative approaches to weight loss in a high risk population: the small changes and lasting effects (scale) trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5404988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28382755
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/oby.21780
work_keys_str_mv AT phillipsericag innovativeapproachestoweightlossinahighriskpopulationthesmallchangesandlastingeffectsscaletrial
AT charlsonmary innovativeapproachestoweightlossinahighriskpopulationthesmallchangesandlastingeffectsscaletrial
AT wellsmartint innovativeapproachestoweightlossinahighriskpopulationthesmallchangesandlastingeffectsscaletrial
AT winstonginger innovativeapproachestoweightlossinahighriskpopulationthesmallchangesandlastingeffectsscaletrial
AT ramosrosio innovativeapproachestoweightlossinahighriskpopulationthesmallchangesandlastingeffectsscaletrial
AT devinecarolm innovativeapproachestoweightlossinahighriskpopulationthesmallchangesandlastingeffectsscaletrial
AT wethingtonelaine innovativeapproachestoweightlossinahighriskpopulationthesmallchangesandlastingeffectsscaletrial
AT petersonjaneyc innovativeapproachestoweightlossinahighriskpopulationthesmallchangesandlastingeffectsscaletrial
AT wansinkbrian innovativeapproachestoweightlossinahighriskpopulationthesmallchangesandlastingeffectsscaletrial