Cargando…

Process Evaluation of a Participatory Supportive Return to Work Program for Workers Without a Permanent Employment Contract, Sick-Listed Due to a Common Mental Disorder

Purpose This study aimed to perform a process evaluation of a participatory supportive return to work program for workers without a (permanent) employment contract, sick-listed due to a common mental disorder. The program consisted of a participatory approach, integrated care and direct placement in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lammerts, Lieke, Schaafsma, Frederieke G., van Mechelen, Willem, Anema, Johannes R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5405103/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26811172
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10926-016-9625-6
_version_ 1783231703579361280
author Lammerts, Lieke
Schaafsma, Frederieke G.
van Mechelen, Willem
Anema, Johannes R.
author_facet Lammerts, Lieke
Schaafsma, Frederieke G.
van Mechelen, Willem
Anema, Johannes R.
author_sort Lammerts, Lieke
collection PubMed
description Purpose This study aimed to perform a process evaluation of a participatory supportive return to work program for workers without a (permanent) employment contract, sick-listed due to a common mental disorder. The program consisted of a participatory approach, integrated care and direct placement in a competitive job. Our main questions were: were these components realized in practice and in accordance with the protocol? The evaluation took place alongside a randomized controlled trial. Methods The study population consisted of workers who filed a sickness benefit claim at the Dutch Social Security Agency, professionals of this agency and of vocational rehabilitation agencies. We focused on sick-listed workers and professionals who had actually participated in the intervention. Data was collected mainly by questionnaires. Results Only 36 out of 94 intervention group participants started with the program. In half of these cases application of integrated care was reported. Most other steps in the program were completed. However, fidelity to the protocol was low to reasonable. Much delay was observed in the execution of the program and only two sick-listed workers were placed in a competitive job. Still, satisfaction with the participatory approach was good. Conclusions Despite the positive evaluation of the participatory approach, the full program was executed less successfully compared to similar programs evaluated in earlier studies. This will probably affect the outcomes of our trial. Findings from this study will help to interpret these outcomes. Nevertheless, more knowledge is needed about experiences of stakeholders who participated in the program. Trial Registration NTR3563. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10926-016-9625-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5405103
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54051032017-05-09 Process Evaluation of a Participatory Supportive Return to Work Program for Workers Without a Permanent Employment Contract, Sick-Listed Due to a Common Mental Disorder Lammerts, Lieke Schaafsma, Frederieke G. van Mechelen, Willem Anema, Johannes R. J Occup Rehabil Article Purpose This study aimed to perform a process evaluation of a participatory supportive return to work program for workers without a (permanent) employment contract, sick-listed due to a common mental disorder. The program consisted of a participatory approach, integrated care and direct placement in a competitive job. Our main questions were: were these components realized in practice and in accordance with the protocol? The evaluation took place alongside a randomized controlled trial. Methods The study population consisted of workers who filed a sickness benefit claim at the Dutch Social Security Agency, professionals of this agency and of vocational rehabilitation agencies. We focused on sick-listed workers and professionals who had actually participated in the intervention. Data was collected mainly by questionnaires. Results Only 36 out of 94 intervention group participants started with the program. In half of these cases application of integrated care was reported. Most other steps in the program were completed. However, fidelity to the protocol was low to reasonable. Much delay was observed in the execution of the program and only two sick-listed workers were placed in a competitive job. Still, satisfaction with the participatory approach was good. Conclusions Despite the positive evaluation of the participatory approach, the full program was executed less successfully compared to similar programs evaluated in earlier studies. This will probably affect the outcomes of our trial. Findings from this study will help to interpret these outcomes. Nevertheless, more knowledge is needed about experiences of stakeholders who participated in the program. Trial Registration NTR3563. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10926-016-9625-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2016-01-25 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5405103/ /pubmed/26811172 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10926-016-9625-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Lammerts, Lieke
Schaafsma, Frederieke G.
van Mechelen, Willem
Anema, Johannes R.
Process Evaluation of a Participatory Supportive Return to Work Program for Workers Without a Permanent Employment Contract, Sick-Listed Due to a Common Mental Disorder
title Process Evaluation of a Participatory Supportive Return to Work Program for Workers Without a Permanent Employment Contract, Sick-Listed Due to a Common Mental Disorder
title_full Process Evaluation of a Participatory Supportive Return to Work Program for Workers Without a Permanent Employment Contract, Sick-Listed Due to a Common Mental Disorder
title_fullStr Process Evaluation of a Participatory Supportive Return to Work Program for Workers Without a Permanent Employment Contract, Sick-Listed Due to a Common Mental Disorder
title_full_unstemmed Process Evaluation of a Participatory Supportive Return to Work Program for Workers Without a Permanent Employment Contract, Sick-Listed Due to a Common Mental Disorder
title_short Process Evaluation of a Participatory Supportive Return to Work Program for Workers Without a Permanent Employment Contract, Sick-Listed Due to a Common Mental Disorder
title_sort process evaluation of a participatory supportive return to work program for workers without a permanent employment contract, sick-listed due to a common mental disorder
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5405103/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26811172
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10926-016-9625-6
work_keys_str_mv AT lammertslieke processevaluationofaparticipatorysupportivereturntoworkprogramforworkerswithoutapermanentemploymentcontractsicklistedduetoacommonmentaldisorder
AT schaafsmafrederiekeg processevaluationofaparticipatorysupportivereturntoworkprogramforworkerswithoutapermanentemploymentcontractsicklistedduetoacommonmentaldisorder
AT vanmechelenwillem processevaluationofaparticipatorysupportivereturntoworkprogramforworkerswithoutapermanentemploymentcontractsicklistedduetoacommonmentaldisorder
AT anemajohannesr processevaluationofaparticipatorysupportivereturntoworkprogramforworkerswithoutapermanentemploymentcontractsicklistedduetoacommonmentaldisorder