Cargando…
Process Evaluation of a Participatory Supportive Return to Work Program for Workers Without a Permanent Employment Contract, Sick-Listed Due to a Common Mental Disorder
Purpose This study aimed to perform a process evaluation of a participatory supportive return to work program for workers without a (permanent) employment contract, sick-listed due to a common mental disorder. The program consisted of a participatory approach, integrated care and direct placement in...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5405103/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26811172 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10926-016-9625-6 |
_version_ | 1783231703579361280 |
---|---|
author | Lammerts, Lieke Schaafsma, Frederieke G. van Mechelen, Willem Anema, Johannes R. |
author_facet | Lammerts, Lieke Schaafsma, Frederieke G. van Mechelen, Willem Anema, Johannes R. |
author_sort | Lammerts, Lieke |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose This study aimed to perform a process evaluation of a participatory supportive return to work program for workers without a (permanent) employment contract, sick-listed due to a common mental disorder. The program consisted of a participatory approach, integrated care and direct placement in a competitive job. Our main questions were: were these components realized in practice and in accordance with the protocol? The evaluation took place alongside a randomized controlled trial. Methods The study population consisted of workers who filed a sickness benefit claim at the Dutch Social Security Agency, professionals of this agency and of vocational rehabilitation agencies. We focused on sick-listed workers and professionals who had actually participated in the intervention. Data was collected mainly by questionnaires. Results Only 36 out of 94 intervention group participants started with the program. In half of these cases application of integrated care was reported. Most other steps in the program were completed. However, fidelity to the protocol was low to reasonable. Much delay was observed in the execution of the program and only two sick-listed workers were placed in a competitive job. Still, satisfaction with the participatory approach was good. Conclusions Despite the positive evaluation of the participatory approach, the full program was executed less successfully compared to similar programs evaluated in earlier studies. This will probably affect the outcomes of our trial. Findings from this study will help to interpret these outcomes. Nevertheless, more knowledge is needed about experiences of stakeholders who participated in the program. Trial Registration NTR3563. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10926-016-9625-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5405103 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54051032017-05-09 Process Evaluation of a Participatory Supportive Return to Work Program for Workers Without a Permanent Employment Contract, Sick-Listed Due to a Common Mental Disorder Lammerts, Lieke Schaafsma, Frederieke G. van Mechelen, Willem Anema, Johannes R. J Occup Rehabil Article Purpose This study aimed to perform a process evaluation of a participatory supportive return to work program for workers without a (permanent) employment contract, sick-listed due to a common mental disorder. The program consisted of a participatory approach, integrated care and direct placement in a competitive job. Our main questions were: were these components realized in practice and in accordance with the protocol? The evaluation took place alongside a randomized controlled trial. Methods The study population consisted of workers who filed a sickness benefit claim at the Dutch Social Security Agency, professionals of this agency and of vocational rehabilitation agencies. We focused on sick-listed workers and professionals who had actually participated in the intervention. Data was collected mainly by questionnaires. Results Only 36 out of 94 intervention group participants started with the program. In half of these cases application of integrated care was reported. Most other steps in the program were completed. However, fidelity to the protocol was low to reasonable. Much delay was observed in the execution of the program and only two sick-listed workers were placed in a competitive job. Still, satisfaction with the participatory approach was good. Conclusions Despite the positive evaluation of the participatory approach, the full program was executed less successfully compared to similar programs evaluated in earlier studies. This will probably affect the outcomes of our trial. Findings from this study will help to interpret these outcomes. Nevertheless, more knowledge is needed about experiences of stakeholders who participated in the program. Trial Registration NTR3563. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10926-016-9625-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2016-01-25 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5405103/ /pubmed/26811172 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10926-016-9625-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Article Lammerts, Lieke Schaafsma, Frederieke G. van Mechelen, Willem Anema, Johannes R. Process Evaluation of a Participatory Supportive Return to Work Program for Workers Without a Permanent Employment Contract, Sick-Listed Due to a Common Mental Disorder |
title | Process Evaluation of a Participatory Supportive Return to Work Program for Workers Without a Permanent Employment Contract, Sick-Listed Due to a Common Mental Disorder |
title_full | Process Evaluation of a Participatory Supportive Return to Work Program for Workers Without a Permanent Employment Contract, Sick-Listed Due to a Common Mental Disorder |
title_fullStr | Process Evaluation of a Participatory Supportive Return to Work Program for Workers Without a Permanent Employment Contract, Sick-Listed Due to a Common Mental Disorder |
title_full_unstemmed | Process Evaluation of a Participatory Supportive Return to Work Program for Workers Without a Permanent Employment Contract, Sick-Listed Due to a Common Mental Disorder |
title_short | Process Evaluation of a Participatory Supportive Return to Work Program for Workers Without a Permanent Employment Contract, Sick-Listed Due to a Common Mental Disorder |
title_sort | process evaluation of a participatory supportive return to work program for workers without a permanent employment contract, sick-listed due to a common mental disorder |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5405103/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26811172 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10926-016-9625-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lammertslieke processevaluationofaparticipatorysupportivereturntoworkprogramforworkerswithoutapermanentemploymentcontractsicklistedduetoacommonmentaldisorder AT schaafsmafrederiekeg processevaluationofaparticipatorysupportivereturntoworkprogramforworkerswithoutapermanentemploymentcontractsicklistedduetoacommonmentaldisorder AT vanmechelenwillem processevaluationofaparticipatorysupportivereturntoworkprogramforworkerswithoutapermanentemploymentcontractsicklistedduetoacommonmentaldisorder AT anemajohannesr processevaluationofaparticipatorysupportivereturntoworkprogramforworkerswithoutapermanentemploymentcontractsicklistedduetoacommonmentaldisorder |