Cargando…

The clinical and cost-effectiveness of stratified care for patients with sciatica: the SCOPiC randomised controlled trial protocol (ISRCTN75449581)

BACKGROUND: Sciatica has a substantial impact on patients, and is associated with high healthcare and societal costs. Although there is variation in the clinical management of sciatica, the current model of care usually involves an initial period of ‘wait and see’ for most patients, with simple meas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Foster, Nadine E., Konstantinou, Kika, Lewis, Martyn, Ogollah, Reuben, Dunn, Kate M., van der Windt, Danielle, Beardmore, Ruth, Artus, Majid, Bartlam, Bernadette, Hill, Jonathan C., Jowett, Sue, Kigozi, Jesse, Mallen, Christian, Saunders, Benjamin, Hay, Elaine M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5405475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28441971
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1513-5
_version_ 1783231772208660480
author Foster, Nadine E.
Konstantinou, Kika
Lewis, Martyn
Ogollah, Reuben
Dunn, Kate M.
van der Windt, Danielle
Beardmore, Ruth
Artus, Majid
Bartlam, Bernadette
Hill, Jonathan C.
Jowett, Sue
Kigozi, Jesse
Mallen, Christian
Saunders, Benjamin
Hay, Elaine M.
author_facet Foster, Nadine E.
Konstantinou, Kika
Lewis, Martyn
Ogollah, Reuben
Dunn, Kate M.
van der Windt, Danielle
Beardmore, Ruth
Artus, Majid
Bartlam, Bernadette
Hill, Jonathan C.
Jowett, Sue
Kigozi, Jesse
Mallen, Christian
Saunders, Benjamin
Hay, Elaine M.
author_sort Foster, Nadine E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Sciatica has a substantial impact on patients, and is associated with high healthcare and societal costs. Although there is variation in the clinical management of sciatica, the current model of care usually involves an initial period of ‘wait and see’ for most patients, with simple measures of advice and analgesia, followed by conservative and/or more invasive interventions if symptoms fail to resolve. A model of care is needed that does not over-treat those with a good prognosis yet identifies patients who do need more intensive treatment to help with symptoms, and return to everyday function including work. The aim of the SCOPiC trial (SCiatica Outcomes in Primary Care) is to establish whether stratified care based on subgrouping using a combination of prognostic and clinical information, with matched care pathways, is more effective than non-stratified care, for improving time to symptom resolution in patients consulting with sciatica in primary care. We will also assess the impact of stratified care on service delivery and evaluate its cost-effectiveness compared to non-stratified care. METHODS/DESIGN: Multicentre, pragmatic, parallel arm randomised trial, with internal pilot, cost-effectiveness analysis and embedded qualitative study. We will recruit 470 adult patients with sciatica from general practices in England and Wales, over 24 months. Patients will be randomised to stratified care or non-stratified care, and treated in physiotherapy and spinal specialist services, in participating NHS services. The primary outcome is time to first resolution of sciatica symptoms, measured on a 6-point ordered categorical scale, collected using text messaging. Secondary outcomes include physical function, pain intensity, quality of life, work loss, healthcare use and satisfaction with treatment, and will be collected using postal questionnaires at 4 and 12-month follow-up. Semi-structured qualitative interviews with a subsample of participants and clinicians will explore the acceptability of stratified care. DISCUSSION: This paper presents the details of the rationale, design and processes of the SCOPiC trial. Results from this trial will contribute to the evidence base for management of patients with sciatica consulting in primary care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN75449581, date: 20.11.2014.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5405475
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54054752017-04-27 The clinical and cost-effectiveness of stratified care for patients with sciatica: the SCOPiC randomised controlled trial protocol (ISRCTN75449581) Foster, Nadine E. Konstantinou, Kika Lewis, Martyn Ogollah, Reuben Dunn, Kate M. van der Windt, Danielle Beardmore, Ruth Artus, Majid Bartlam, Bernadette Hill, Jonathan C. Jowett, Sue Kigozi, Jesse Mallen, Christian Saunders, Benjamin Hay, Elaine M. BMC Musculoskelet Disord Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Sciatica has a substantial impact on patients, and is associated with high healthcare and societal costs. Although there is variation in the clinical management of sciatica, the current model of care usually involves an initial period of ‘wait and see’ for most patients, with simple measures of advice and analgesia, followed by conservative and/or more invasive interventions if symptoms fail to resolve. A model of care is needed that does not over-treat those with a good prognosis yet identifies patients who do need more intensive treatment to help with symptoms, and return to everyday function including work. The aim of the SCOPiC trial (SCiatica Outcomes in Primary Care) is to establish whether stratified care based on subgrouping using a combination of prognostic and clinical information, with matched care pathways, is more effective than non-stratified care, for improving time to symptom resolution in patients consulting with sciatica in primary care. We will also assess the impact of stratified care on service delivery and evaluate its cost-effectiveness compared to non-stratified care. METHODS/DESIGN: Multicentre, pragmatic, parallel arm randomised trial, with internal pilot, cost-effectiveness analysis and embedded qualitative study. We will recruit 470 adult patients with sciatica from general practices in England and Wales, over 24 months. Patients will be randomised to stratified care or non-stratified care, and treated in physiotherapy and spinal specialist services, in participating NHS services. The primary outcome is time to first resolution of sciatica symptoms, measured on a 6-point ordered categorical scale, collected using text messaging. Secondary outcomes include physical function, pain intensity, quality of life, work loss, healthcare use and satisfaction with treatment, and will be collected using postal questionnaires at 4 and 12-month follow-up. Semi-structured qualitative interviews with a subsample of participants and clinicians will explore the acceptability of stratified care. DISCUSSION: This paper presents the details of the rationale, design and processes of the SCOPiC trial. Results from this trial will contribute to the evidence base for management of patients with sciatica consulting in primary care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN75449581, date: 20.11.2014. BioMed Central 2017-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5405475/ /pubmed/28441971 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1513-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Foster, Nadine E.
Konstantinou, Kika
Lewis, Martyn
Ogollah, Reuben
Dunn, Kate M.
van der Windt, Danielle
Beardmore, Ruth
Artus, Majid
Bartlam, Bernadette
Hill, Jonathan C.
Jowett, Sue
Kigozi, Jesse
Mallen, Christian
Saunders, Benjamin
Hay, Elaine M.
The clinical and cost-effectiveness of stratified care for patients with sciatica: the SCOPiC randomised controlled trial protocol (ISRCTN75449581)
title The clinical and cost-effectiveness of stratified care for patients with sciatica: the SCOPiC randomised controlled trial protocol (ISRCTN75449581)
title_full The clinical and cost-effectiveness of stratified care for patients with sciatica: the SCOPiC randomised controlled trial protocol (ISRCTN75449581)
title_fullStr The clinical and cost-effectiveness of stratified care for patients with sciatica: the SCOPiC randomised controlled trial protocol (ISRCTN75449581)
title_full_unstemmed The clinical and cost-effectiveness of stratified care for patients with sciatica: the SCOPiC randomised controlled trial protocol (ISRCTN75449581)
title_short The clinical and cost-effectiveness of stratified care for patients with sciatica: the SCOPiC randomised controlled trial protocol (ISRCTN75449581)
title_sort clinical and cost-effectiveness of stratified care for patients with sciatica: the scopic randomised controlled trial protocol (isrctn75449581)
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5405475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28441971
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1513-5
work_keys_str_mv AT fosternadinee theclinicalandcosteffectivenessofstratifiedcareforpatientswithsciaticathescopicrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocolisrctn75449581
AT konstantinoukika theclinicalandcosteffectivenessofstratifiedcareforpatientswithsciaticathescopicrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocolisrctn75449581
AT lewismartyn theclinicalandcosteffectivenessofstratifiedcareforpatientswithsciaticathescopicrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocolisrctn75449581
AT ogollahreuben theclinicalandcosteffectivenessofstratifiedcareforpatientswithsciaticathescopicrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocolisrctn75449581
AT dunnkatem theclinicalandcosteffectivenessofstratifiedcareforpatientswithsciaticathescopicrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocolisrctn75449581
AT vanderwindtdanielle theclinicalandcosteffectivenessofstratifiedcareforpatientswithsciaticathescopicrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocolisrctn75449581
AT beardmoreruth theclinicalandcosteffectivenessofstratifiedcareforpatientswithsciaticathescopicrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocolisrctn75449581
AT artusmajid theclinicalandcosteffectivenessofstratifiedcareforpatientswithsciaticathescopicrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocolisrctn75449581
AT bartlambernadette theclinicalandcosteffectivenessofstratifiedcareforpatientswithsciaticathescopicrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocolisrctn75449581
AT hilljonathanc theclinicalandcosteffectivenessofstratifiedcareforpatientswithsciaticathescopicrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocolisrctn75449581
AT jowettsue theclinicalandcosteffectivenessofstratifiedcareforpatientswithsciaticathescopicrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocolisrctn75449581
AT kigozijesse theclinicalandcosteffectivenessofstratifiedcareforpatientswithsciaticathescopicrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocolisrctn75449581
AT mallenchristian theclinicalandcosteffectivenessofstratifiedcareforpatientswithsciaticathescopicrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocolisrctn75449581
AT saundersbenjamin theclinicalandcosteffectivenessofstratifiedcareforpatientswithsciaticathescopicrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocolisrctn75449581
AT hayelainem theclinicalandcosteffectivenessofstratifiedcareforpatientswithsciaticathescopicrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocolisrctn75449581
AT fosternadinee clinicalandcosteffectivenessofstratifiedcareforpatientswithsciaticathescopicrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocolisrctn75449581
AT konstantinoukika clinicalandcosteffectivenessofstratifiedcareforpatientswithsciaticathescopicrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocolisrctn75449581
AT lewismartyn clinicalandcosteffectivenessofstratifiedcareforpatientswithsciaticathescopicrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocolisrctn75449581
AT ogollahreuben clinicalandcosteffectivenessofstratifiedcareforpatientswithsciaticathescopicrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocolisrctn75449581
AT dunnkatem clinicalandcosteffectivenessofstratifiedcareforpatientswithsciaticathescopicrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocolisrctn75449581
AT vanderwindtdanielle clinicalandcosteffectivenessofstratifiedcareforpatientswithsciaticathescopicrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocolisrctn75449581
AT beardmoreruth clinicalandcosteffectivenessofstratifiedcareforpatientswithsciaticathescopicrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocolisrctn75449581
AT artusmajid clinicalandcosteffectivenessofstratifiedcareforpatientswithsciaticathescopicrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocolisrctn75449581
AT bartlambernadette clinicalandcosteffectivenessofstratifiedcareforpatientswithsciaticathescopicrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocolisrctn75449581
AT hilljonathanc clinicalandcosteffectivenessofstratifiedcareforpatientswithsciaticathescopicrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocolisrctn75449581
AT jowettsue clinicalandcosteffectivenessofstratifiedcareforpatientswithsciaticathescopicrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocolisrctn75449581
AT kigozijesse clinicalandcosteffectivenessofstratifiedcareforpatientswithsciaticathescopicrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocolisrctn75449581
AT mallenchristian clinicalandcosteffectivenessofstratifiedcareforpatientswithsciaticathescopicrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocolisrctn75449581
AT saundersbenjamin clinicalandcosteffectivenessofstratifiedcareforpatientswithsciaticathescopicrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocolisrctn75449581
AT hayelainem clinicalandcosteffectivenessofstratifiedcareforpatientswithsciaticathescopicrandomisedcontrolledtrialprotocolisrctn75449581