Cargando…

Electronic palliative care coordination systems: Devising and testing a methodology for evaluating documentation

BACKGROUND: The need to improve coordination of care at end of life has driven electronic palliative care coordination systems implementation across the United Kingdom and internationally. No approaches for evaluating electronic palliative care coordination systems use in practice have been develope...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Allsop, Matthew J, Kite, Suzanne, McDermott, Sarah, Penn, Naomi, Millares-Martin, Pablo, Bennett, Michael I
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5405823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27507636
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269216316663881
_version_ 1783231845301747712
author Allsop, Matthew J
Kite, Suzanne
McDermott, Sarah
Penn, Naomi
Millares-Martin, Pablo
Bennett, Michael I
author_facet Allsop, Matthew J
Kite, Suzanne
McDermott, Sarah
Penn, Naomi
Millares-Martin, Pablo
Bennett, Michael I
author_sort Allsop, Matthew J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The need to improve coordination of care at end of life has driven electronic palliative care coordination systems implementation across the United Kingdom and internationally. No approaches for evaluating electronic palliative care coordination systems use in practice have been developed. AIM: This study outlines and applies an evaluation framework for examining how and when electronic documentation of advance care planning is occurring in end of life care services. DESIGN: A pragmatic, formative process evaluation approach was adopted. The evaluation drew on the Project Review and Objective Evaluation methodology to guide the evaluation framework design, focusing on clinical processes. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Data were extracted from electronic palliative care coordination systems for 82 of 108 general practices across a large UK city. All deaths (n = 1229) recorded on electronic palliative care coordination systems between April 2014 and March 2015 were included to determine the proportion of all deaths recorded, median number of days prior to death that key information was recorded and observations about routine data use. RESULTS: The evaluation identified 26.8% of all deaths recorded on electronic palliative care coordination systems. The median number of days to death was calculated for initiation of an electronic palliative care coordination systems record (31 days), recording a patient’s preferred place of death (8 days) and entry of Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation decisions (34 days). Where preferred and actual place of death was documented, these were matching for 75% of patients. Anomalies were identified in coding used during data entry on electronic palliative care coordination systems. CONCLUSION: This study reports the first methodology for evaluating how and when electronic palliative care coordination systems documentation is occurring. It raises questions about what can be drawn from routine data collected through electronic palliative care coordination systems and outlines considerations for future evaluation. Future evaluations should consider work processes of health professionals using electronic palliative care coordination systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5405823
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54058232017-05-08 Electronic palliative care coordination systems: Devising and testing a methodology for evaluating documentation Allsop, Matthew J Kite, Suzanne McDermott, Sarah Penn, Naomi Millares-Martin, Pablo Bennett, Michael I Palliat Med Original Articles BACKGROUND: The need to improve coordination of care at end of life has driven electronic palliative care coordination systems implementation across the United Kingdom and internationally. No approaches for evaluating electronic palliative care coordination systems use in practice have been developed. AIM: This study outlines and applies an evaluation framework for examining how and when electronic documentation of advance care planning is occurring in end of life care services. DESIGN: A pragmatic, formative process evaluation approach was adopted. The evaluation drew on the Project Review and Objective Evaluation methodology to guide the evaluation framework design, focusing on clinical processes. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Data were extracted from electronic palliative care coordination systems for 82 of 108 general practices across a large UK city. All deaths (n = 1229) recorded on electronic palliative care coordination systems between April 2014 and March 2015 were included to determine the proportion of all deaths recorded, median number of days prior to death that key information was recorded and observations about routine data use. RESULTS: The evaluation identified 26.8% of all deaths recorded on electronic palliative care coordination systems. The median number of days to death was calculated for initiation of an electronic palliative care coordination systems record (31 days), recording a patient’s preferred place of death (8 days) and entry of Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation decisions (34 days). Where preferred and actual place of death was documented, these were matching for 75% of patients. Anomalies were identified in coding used during data entry on electronic palliative care coordination systems. CONCLUSION: This study reports the first methodology for evaluating how and when electronic palliative care coordination systems documentation is occurring. It raises questions about what can be drawn from routine data collected through electronic palliative care coordination systems and outlines considerations for future evaluation. Future evaluations should consider work processes of health professionals using electronic palliative care coordination systems. SAGE Publications 2016-08-09 2017-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5405823/ /pubmed/27507636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269216316663881 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Allsop, Matthew J
Kite, Suzanne
McDermott, Sarah
Penn, Naomi
Millares-Martin, Pablo
Bennett, Michael I
Electronic palliative care coordination systems: Devising and testing a methodology for evaluating documentation
title Electronic palliative care coordination systems: Devising and testing a methodology for evaluating documentation
title_full Electronic palliative care coordination systems: Devising and testing a methodology for evaluating documentation
title_fullStr Electronic palliative care coordination systems: Devising and testing a methodology for evaluating documentation
title_full_unstemmed Electronic palliative care coordination systems: Devising and testing a methodology for evaluating documentation
title_short Electronic palliative care coordination systems: Devising and testing a methodology for evaluating documentation
title_sort electronic palliative care coordination systems: devising and testing a methodology for evaluating documentation
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5405823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27507636
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269216316663881
work_keys_str_mv AT allsopmatthewj electronicpalliativecarecoordinationsystemsdevisingandtestingamethodologyforevaluatingdocumentation
AT kitesuzanne electronicpalliativecarecoordinationsystemsdevisingandtestingamethodologyforevaluatingdocumentation
AT mcdermottsarah electronicpalliativecarecoordinationsystemsdevisingandtestingamethodologyforevaluatingdocumentation
AT pennnaomi electronicpalliativecarecoordinationsystemsdevisingandtestingamethodologyforevaluatingdocumentation
AT millaresmartinpablo electronicpalliativecarecoordinationsystemsdevisingandtestingamethodologyforevaluatingdocumentation
AT bennettmichaeli electronicpalliativecarecoordinationsystemsdevisingandtestingamethodologyforevaluatingdocumentation