Cargando…

No-touch radiofrequency ablation using multiple electrodes: An in vivo comparison study of switching monopolar versus switching bipolar modes in porcine livers

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the in vivo technical feasibility, efficiency, and safety of switching bipolar (SB) and switching monopolar (SM) radiofrequency ablation (RFA) as a no-touch ablation technique in the porcine liver. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The animal care and use committee approved this animal s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chang, Won, Lee, Jeong Min, Yoon, Jeong Hee, Lee, Dong Ho, Lee, Sang Min, Lee, Kyoung Bun, Kim, Bo Ram, Kim, Tae-Hyung, Lee, Seunghyun, Han, Joon Koo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5405985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28445542
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176350
_version_ 1783231876569235456
author Chang, Won
Lee, Jeong Min
Yoon, Jeong Hee
Lee, Dong Ho
Lee, Sang Min
Lee, Kyoung Bun
Kim, Bo Ram
Kim, Tae-Hyung
Lee, Seunghyun
Han, Joon Koo
author_facet Chang, Won
Lee, Jeong Min
Yoon, Jeong Hee
Lee, Dong Ho
Lee, Sang Min
Lee, Kyoung Bun
Kim, Bo Ram
Kim, Tae-Hyung
Lee, Seunghyun
Han, Joon Koo
author_sort Chang, Won
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the in vivo technical feasibility, efficiency, and safety of switching bipolar (SB) and switching monopolar (SM) radiofrequency ablation (RFA) as a no-touch ablation technique in the porcine liver. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The animal care and use committee approved this animal study and 16 pigs were used in two independent experiments. In the first experiment, RFA was performed on 2-cm tumor mimickers in the liver using a no-touch technique in the SM mode (2 groups, SM1: 10 minutes, n = 10; SM2: 15 minutes, n = 10) and SB-mode (1 group, SB: 10 minutes, n = 10). The technical success with sufficient safety margins, creation of confluent necrosis, ablation size, and distance between the electrode and ablation zone margin (DEM), were compared between groups. In the second experiment, thermal injury to the adjacent anatomic organs was compared between SM-RFA (15 minutes, n = 13) and SB-RFA modes (10 minutes, n = 13). RESULTS: The rates of the technical success and the creation of confluent necrosis were higher in the SB group than in the SM1 groups (100% vs. 60% and 90% vs. 40%, both p < 0.05). The ablation volume in the SM2 group was significantly larger than that in the SB group (59.2±18.7 cm(3) vs. 39.8±9.7 cm(3,) p < 0.05), and the DEM in the SM2 group was also larger than that in the SB group (1.39±0.21 cm vs. 1.07±0.10 cm, p < 0.05). In the second experiment, the incidence of thermal injury to the adjacent organs and tissues in the SB group (23.1%, 3/13) was significantly lower than that in the SM group (69.2%, 8/13) (p = 0.021). CONCLUSION: SB-RFA was more advantageous for a no-touch technique for liver tumors, showing the potential of a better safety profile than SM-RFA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5405985
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54059852017-05-14 No-touch radiofrequency ablation using multiple electrodes: An in vivo comparison study of switching monopolar versus switching bipolar modes in porcine livers Chang, Won Lee, Jeong Min Yoon, Jeong Hee Lee, Dong Ho Lee, Sang Min Lee, Kyoung Bun Kim, Bo Ram Kim, Tae-Hyung Lee, Seunghyun Han, Joon Koo PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the in vivo technical feasibility, efficiency, and safety of switching bipolar (SB) and switching monopolar (SM) radiofrequency ablation (RFA) as a no-touch ablation technique in the porcine liver. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The animal care and use committee approved this animal study and 16 pigs were used in two independent experiments. In the first experiment, RFA was performed on 2-cm tumor mimickers in the liver using a no-touch technique in the SM mode (2 groups, SM1: 10 minutes, n = 10; SM2: 15 minutes, n = 10) and SB-mode (1 group, SB: 10 minutes, n = 10). The technical success with sufficient safety margins, creation of confluent necrosis, ablation size, and distance between the electrode and ablation zone margin (DEM), were compared between groups. In the second experiment, thermal injury to the adjacent anatomic organs was compared between SM-RFA (15 minutes, n = 13) and SB-RFA modes (10 minutes, n = 13). RESULTS: The rates of the technical success and the creation of confluent necrosis were higher in the SB group than in the SM1 groups (100% vs. 60% and 90% vs. 40%, both p < 0.05). The ablation volume in the SM2 group was significantly larger than that in the SB group (59.2±18.7 cm(3) vs. 39.8±9.7 cm(3,) p < 0.05), and the DEM in the SM2 group was also larger than that in the SB group (1.39±0.21 cm vs. 1.07±0.10 cm, p < 0.05). In the second experiment, the incidence of thermal injury to the adjacent organs and tissues in the SB group (23.1%, 3/13) was significantly lower than that in the SM group (69.2%, 8/13) (p = 0.021). CONCLUSION: SB-RFA was more advantageous for a no-touch technique for liver tumors, showing the potential of a better safety profile than SM-RFA. Public Library of Science 2017-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5405985/ /pubmed/28445542 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176350 Text en © 2017 Chang et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chang, Won
Lee, Jeong Min
Yoon, Jeong Hee
Lee, Dong Ho
Lee, Sang Min
Lee, Kyoung Bun
Kim, Bo Ram
Kim, Tae-Hyung
Lee, Seunghyun
Han, Joon Koo
No-touch radiofrequency ablation using multiple electrodes: An in vivo comparison study of switching monopolar versus switching bipolar modes in porcine livers
title No-touch radiofrequency ablation using multiple electrodes: An in vivo comparison study of switching monopolar versus switching bipolar modes in porcine livers
title_full No-touch radiofrequency ablation using multiple electrodes: An in vivo comparison study of switching monopolar versus switching bipolar modes in porcine livers
title_fullStr No-touch radiofrequency ablation using multiple electrodes: An in vivo comparison study of switching monopolar versus switching bipolar modes in porcine livers
title_full_unstemmed No-touch radiofrequency ablation using multiple electrodes: An in vivo comparison study of switching monopolar versus switching bipolar modes in porcine livers
title_short No-touch radiofrequency ablation using multiple electrodes: An in vivo comparison study of switching monopolar versus switching bipolar modes in porcine livers
title_sort no-touch radiofrequency ablation using multiple electrodes: an in vivo comparison study of switching monopolar versus switching bipolar modes in porcine livers
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5405985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28445542
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176350
work_keys_str_mv AT changwon notouchradiofrequencyablationusingmultipleelectrodesaninvivocomparisonstudyofswitchingmonopolarversusswitchingbipolarmodesinporcinelivers
AT leejeongmin notouchradiofrequencyablationusingmultipleelectrodesaninvivocomparisonstudyofswitchingmonopolarversusswitchingbipolarmodesinporcinelivers
AT yoonjeonghee notouchradiofrequencyablationusingmultipleelectrodesaninvivocomparisonstudyofswitchingmonopolarversusswitchingbipolarmodesinporcinelivers
AT leedongho notouchradiofrequencyablationusingmultipleelectrodesaninvivocomparisonstudyofswitchingmonopolarversusswitchingbipolarmodesinporcinelivers
AT leesangmin notouchradiofrequencyablationusingmultipleelectrodesaninvivocomparisonstudyofswitchingmonopolarversusswitchingbipolarmodesinporcinelivers
AT leekyoungbun notouchradiofrequencyablationusingmultipleelectrodesaninvivocomparisonstudyofswitchingmonopolarversusswitchingbipolarmodesinporcinelivers
AT kimboram notouchradiofrequencyablationusingmultipleelectrodesaninvivocomparisonstudyofswitchingmonopolarversusswitchingbipolarmodesinporcinelivers
AT kimtaehyung notouchradiofrequencyablationusingmultipleelectrodesaninvivocomparisonstudyofswitchingmonopolarversusswitchingbipolarmodesinporcinelivers
AT leeseunghyun notouchradiofrequencyablationusingmultipleelectrodesaninvivocomparisonstudyofswitchingmonopolarversusswitchingbipolarmodesinporcinelivers
AT hanjoonkoo notouchradiofrequencyablationusingmultipleelectrodesaninvivocomparisonstudyofswitchingmonopolarversusswitchingbipolarmodesinporcinelivers