Cargando…

Feasibility and safety of emergency laparoscopic partial splenectomy: A retrospective analysis

The increased awareness of asplenia-related life-threatening complications has led to the development of parenchyma sparing splenic resections in past few years. The aim of this study is to retrospectively analyze the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic partial splenectomy (LPS) in selected emerg...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Hongyu, Wei, Yonggang, Peng, Bing, Li, Bo, Liu, Fei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5406050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28422834
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000006450
_version_ 1783231891584843776
author Li, Hongyu
Wei, Yonggang
Peng, Bing
Li, Bo
Liu, Fei
author_facet Li, Hongyu
Wei, Yonggang
Peng, Bing
Li, Bo
Liu, Fei
author_sort Li, Hongyu
collection PubMed
description The increased awareness of asplenia-related life-threatening complications has led to the development of parenchyma sparing splenic resections in past few years. The aim of this study is to retrospectively analyze the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic partial splenectomy (LPS) in selected emergency patients. From January 2013 to December 2015, there were 46 emergency patients, diagnosed with splenic rupture, admitted in our department. Selection criteria for LPS: (1) Preoperative CT scan revealed single pole rupture without spleen pedicle injury; (2) BP>90/60 mm Hg and heart rates <120 bpm; (3) No sigh of multiple organ injury. Eventually, LPS was performed in 21 patients (Group LPS), while laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) was performed in 20 patients (Group LS). The main cause of splenic rupture was traffic accident, followed by blunt injury and high falling injury. Abdominal CT scan showed the mean longitudinal diameter of spleen of group LPS was 14.2 ± 1.8 cm (range 12–17 cm), while the size of remnant spleen was 5.5 ± 1.2 cm. Between 2 groups, operation time (LPS: 122.6 ± 17.2 min vs LS: 110.5 ± 18.7 minutes, P = .117), and intraoperative blood loss (LPS: 174 ± 22 mL vs LS: 169 ± 29 mL, P = .331) were similar. There were 2 patients suffered subsequent unstable vital sign altering during mobilization when performing LPS. Conversion to LS (2/21, 9.52%) was decided and successfully completed. Although there was no patient suffered postoperative OPSI or thrombocytosis events in both groups after 6-month follow-up, the mean platelets and leukocyte count were significantly lower in group LPS. Splenic regrowth was evaluated in 20 patients of group LPS. And the mean regrowth of splenic volume reached 19% (10%-26%). Due to its minimal invasive effect and functional splenic tissue preservation, LPS may be a safe and feasible approach for emergency patients. And prospective trials with clear inclusion criteria are needed to proof the benefit of LPS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5406050
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54060502017-04-28 Feasibility and safety of emergency laparoscopic partial splenectomy: A retrospective analysis Li, Hongyu Wei, Yonggang Peng, Bing Li, Bo Liu, Fei Medicine (Baltimore) 7100 The increased awareness of asplenia-related life-threatening complications has led to the development of parenchyma sparing splenic resections in past few years. The aim of this study is to retrospectively analyze the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic partial splenectomy (LPS) in selected emergency patients. From January 2013 to December 2015, there were 46 emergency patients, diagnosed with splenic rupture, admitted in our department. Selection criteria for LPS: (1) Preoperative CT scan revealed single pole rupture without spleen pedicle injury; (2) BP>90/60 mm Hg and heart rates <120 bpm; (3) No sigh of multiple organ injury. Eventually, LPS was performed in 21 patients (Group LPS), while laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) was performed in 20 patients (Group LS). The main cause of splenic rupture was traffic accident, followed by blunt injury and high falling injury. Abdominal CT scan showed the mean longitudinal diameter of spleen of group LPS was 14.2 ± 1.8 cm (range 12–17 cm), while the size of remnant spleen was 5.5 ± 1.2 cm. Between 2 groups, operation time (LPS: 122.6 ± 17.2 min vs LS: 110.5 ± 18.7 minutes, P = .117), and intraoperative blood loss (LPS: 174 ± 22 mL vs LS: 169 ± 29 mL, P = .331) were similar. There were 2 patients suffered subsequent unstable vital sign altering during mobilization when performing LPS. Conversion to LS (2/21, 9.52%) was decided and successfully completed. Although there was no patient suffered postoperative OPSI or thrombocytosis events in both groups after 6-month follow-up, the mean platelets and leukocyte count were significantly lower in group LPS. Splenic regrowth was evaluated in 20 patients of group LPS. And the mean regrowth of splenic volume reached 19% (10%-26%). Due to its minimal invasive effect and functional splenic tissue preservation, LPS may be a safe and feasible approach for emergency patients. And prospective trials with clear inclusion criteria are needed to proof the benefit of LPS. Wolters Kluwer Health 2017-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5406050/ /pubmed/28422834 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000006450 Text en Copyright © 2017 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
spellingShingle 7100
Li, Hongyu
Wei, Yonggang
Peng, Bing
Li, Bo
Liu, Fei
Feasibility and safety of emergency laparoscopic partial splenectomy: A retrospective analysis
title Feasibility and safety of emergency laparoscopic partial splenectomy: A retrospective analysis
title_full Feasibility and safety of emergency laparoscopic partial splenectomy: A retrospective analysis
title_fullStr Feasibility and safety of emergency laparoscopic partial splenectomy: A retrospective analysis
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility and safety of emergency laparoscopic partial splenectomy: A retrospective analysis
title_short Feasibility and safety of emergency laparoscopic partial splenectomy: A retrospective analysis
title_sort feasibility and safety of emergency laparoscopic partial splenectomy: a retrospective analysis
topic 7100
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5406050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28422834
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000006450
work_keys_str_mv AT lihongyu feasibilityandsafetyofemergencylaparoscopicpartialsplenectomyaretrospectiveanalysis
AT weiyonggang feasibilityandsafetyofemergencylaparoscopicpartialsplenectomyaretrospectiveanalysis
AT pengbing feasibilityandsafetyofemergencylaparoscopicpartialsplenectomyaretrospectiveanalysis
AT libo feasibilityandsafetyofemergencylaparoscopicpartialsplenectomyaretrospectiveanalysis
AT liufei feasibilityandsafetyofemergencylaparoscopicpartialsplenectomyaretrospectiveanalysis