Cargando…

Magnetic resonance imaging planning in children with complex congenital heart disease – A new approach

OBJECTIVES: To compare a standard sequential 2D Planning Method (2D-PM) with a 3D offline Planning Method (3D-PM) based on 3D contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) in children with congenital heart disease (CHD). DESIGN: In 14 children with complex CHD (mean: 2.6 years, range: 3...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Valverde, Israel, Tangcharoen, Tarinee, Hussain, Tarique, de Bliek, Hubrecht, Penney, Graeme, Breeuwer, Marcel, Schaeffter, Tobias, Razavi, Reza, Greil, Gerald
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5406152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28491295
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2048004017701870
_version_ 1783231916997083136
author Valverde, Israel
Tangcharoen, Tarinee
Hussain, Tarique
de Bliek, Hubrecht
Penney, Graeme
Breeuwer, Marcel
Schaeffter, Tobias
Razavi, Reza
Greil, Gerald
author_facet Valverde, Israel
Tangcharoen, Tarinee
Hussain, Tarique
de Bliek, Hubrecht
Penney, Graeme
Breeuwer, Marcel
Schaeffter, Tobias
Razavi, Reza
Greil, Gerald
author_sort Valverde, Israel
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To compare a standard sequential 2D Planning Method (2D-PM) with a 3D offline Planning Method (3D-PM) based on 3D contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) in children with congenital heart disease (CHD). DESIGN: In 14 children with complex CHD (mean: 2.6 years, range: 3 months to 7.6 years), axial and coronal cuts were obtained with single slice spin echo sequences to get the final double oblique longitudinal cut of the targeted anatomical structure (2D-PM, n = 31). On a separate workstation, similar maximal intensity projection (MIP) images were generated offline from a 3D CE-MRA. MIP images were localizers for repeated targeted imaging using the previous spin echo sequence (3D-PM). Finally, image coverage, spatial orientation and acquisition time were compared for 2D-PM and 3D-PM. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: 2D-PM and 3D-PM images were similar: both perfectly covered the selected anatomic regions and no spatial differences were found (p>0.05). The mean time for creation of the final imaging plane was 241 ± 31 s (2D-PM) compared to 71 ± 18 s (3D-PM) (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: 3D-PM shows similar results compared to 2D-PM, but allows faster and offline planning thereby reducing the scan time significantly. As newly developed high-resolution 3D datasets can also be used further improvement of this technology is expected.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5406152
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54061522017-05-10 Magnetic resonance imaging planning in children with complex congenital heart disease – A new approach Valverde, Israel Tangcharoen, Tarinee Hussain, Tarique de Bliek, Hubrecht Penney, Graeme Breeuwer, Marcel Schaeffter, Tobias Razavi, Reza Greil, Gerald JRSM Cardiovasc Dis Research Article OBJECTIVES: To compare a standard sequential 2D Planning Method (2D-PM) with a 3D offline Planning Method (3D-PM) based on 3D contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) in children with congenital heart disease (CHD). DESIGN: In 14 children with complex CHD (mean: 2.6 years, range: 3 months to 7.6 years), axial and coronal cuts were obtained with single slice spin echo sequences to get the final double oblique longitudinal cut of the targeted anatomical structure (2D-PM, n = 31). On a separate workstation, similar maximal intensity projection (MIP) images were generated offline from a 3D CE-MRA. MIP images were localizers for repeated targeted imaging using the previous spin echo sequence (3D-PM). Finally, image coverage, spatial orientation and acquisition time were compared for 2D-PM and 3D-PM. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: 2D-PM and 3D-PM images were similar: both perfectly covered the selected anatomic regions and no spatial differences were found (p>0.05). The mean time for creation of the final imaging plane was 241 ± 31 s (2D-PM) compared to 71 ± 18 s (3D-PM) (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: 3D-PM shows similar results compared to 2D-PM, but allows faster and offline planning thereby reducing the scan time significantly. As newly developed high-resolution 3D datasets can also be used further improvement of this technology is expected. SAGE Publications 2017-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5406152/ /pubmed/28491295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2048004017701870 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page(https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Research Article
Valverde, Israel
Tangcharoen, Tarinee
Hussain, Tarique
de Bliek, Hubrecht
Penney, Graeme
Breeuwer, Marcel
Schaeffter, Tobias
Razavi, Reza
Greil, Gerald
Magnetic resonance imaging planning in children with complex congenital heart disease – A new approach
title Magnetic resonance imaging planning in children with complex congenital heart disease – A new approach
title_full Magnetic resonance imaging planning in children with complex congenital heart disease – A new approach
title_fullStr Magnetic resonance imaging planning in children with complex congenital heart disease – A new approach
title_full_unstemmed Magnetic resonance imaging planning in children with complex congenital heart disease – A new approach
title_short Magnetic resonance imaging planning in children with complex congenital heart disease – A new approach
title_sort magnetic resonance imaging planning in children with complex congenital heart disease – a new approach
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5406152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28491295
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2048004017701870
work_keys_str_mv AT valverdeisrael magneticresonanceimagingplanninginchildrenwithcomplexcongenitalheartdiseaseanewapproach
AT tangcharoentarinee magneticresonanceimagingplanninginchildrenwithcomplexcongenitalheartdiseaseanewapproach
AT hussaintarique magneticresonanceimagingplanninginchildrenwithcomplexcongenitalheartdiseaseanewapproach
AT debliekhubrecht magneticresonanceimagingplanninginchildrenwithcomplexcongenitalheartdiseaseanewapproach
AT penneygraeme magneticresonanceimagingplanninginchildrenwithcomplexcongenitalheartdiseaseanewapproach
AT breeuwermarcel magneticresonanceimagingplanninginchildrenwithcomplexcongenitalheartdiseaseanewapproach
AT schaefftertobias magneticresonanceimagingplanninginchildrenwithcomplexcongenitalheartdiseaseanewapproach
AT razavireza magneticresonanceimagingplanninginchildrenwithcomplexcongenitalheartdiseaseanewapproach
AT greilgerald magneticresonanceimagingplanninginchildrenwithcomplexcongenitalheartdiseaseanewapproach