Cargando…

Timeliness of Operating Room Case Planning and Time Utilization: Influence of First and To-Follow Cases

Resource and cost constraints in hospitals demand thorough planning of operating room schedules. Ideally, exact start times and durations are known in advance for each case. However, aside from the first case’s start, most factors are hard to predict. While the role of the start of the first case fo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Balzer, Claudius, Raackow, David, Hahnenkamp, Klaus, Flessa, Steffen, Meissner, Konrad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5406398/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28497037
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2017.00049
_version_ 1783231939527835648
author Balzer, Claudius
Raackow, David
Hahnenkamp, Klaus
Flessa, Steffen
Meissner, Konrad
author_facet Balzer, Claudius
Raackow, David
Hahnenkamp, Klaus
Flessa, Steffen
Meissner, Konrad
author_sort Balzer, Claudius
collection PubMed
description Resource and cost constraints in hospitals demand thorough planning of operating room schedules. Ideally, exact start times and durations are known in advance for each case. However, aside from the first case’s start, most factors are hard to predict. While the role of the start of the first case for optimal room utilization has been shown before, data for to-follow cases are lacking. The present study therefore aimed to analyze all elective surgery cases of a university hospital within 1 year in search of visible patterns. A total of 14,014 cases scheduled on 254 regular working days at a university hospital between September 2015 and August 2016 underwent screening. After eliminating 112 emergencies during regular working hours, 13,547 elective daytime cases were analyzed, out of which 4,346 ranked first, 3,723 second, and 5,478 third or higher in the daily schedule. Also, 36% of cases changed start times from the day before to 7:00 a.m., with half of these (52%) resulting in a delay of more than 15 min. After 7:00 a.m., 87% of cases started more than 10 min off schedule, with 26% being early and 74% late. Timeliness was 15 ± 72 min (mean ± SD) for first, 21 ± 84 min for second, and 25 ± 93 min for all to-follow cases, compared to preoperative day planning, and 21 ± 45, 23 ± 61, and 19 ± 74 min compared to 7:00 a.m. status. Start time deviations were also related to procedure duration, with cases of 61–90 min duration being most reliable (deviation 9.8 ± 67 min compared to 7:00 a.m.), regardless of order. In consequence, cases following after 61–90 min long cases had the shortest deviations of incision time from schedule (16 ± 66 min). Taken together, start times for elective surgery cases deviate substantially from schedule, with first and second cases falling into the highest mean deviation category. Second cases had the largest deviations from scheduled times compared to first and all to-follow cases. While planned vs. actual start times differ among specialties, cases of 61–90 min duration had the most reliable start times, with neither shorter nor longer cases seeming to improve timeliness of start times.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5406398
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54063982017-05-11 Timeliness of Operating Room Case Planning and Time Utilization: Influence of First and To-Follow Cases Balzer, Claudius Raackow, David Hahnenkamp, Klaus Flessa, Steffen Meissner, Konrad Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine Resource and cost constraints in hospitals demand thorough planning of operating room schedules. Ideally, exact start times and durations are known in advance for each case. However, aside from the first case’s start, most factors are hard to predict. While the role of the start of the first case for optimal room utilization has been shown before, data for to-follow cases are lacking. The present study therefore aimed to analyze all elective surgery cases of a university hospital within 1 year in search of visible patterns. A total of 14,014 cases scheduled on 254 regular working days at a university hospital between September 2015 and August 2016 underwent screening. After eliminating 112 emergencies during regular working hours, 13,547 elective daytime cases were analyzed, out of which 4,346 ranked first, 3,723 second, and 5,478 third or higher in the daily schedule. Also, 36% of cases changed start times from the day before to 7:00 a.m., with half of these (52%) resulting in a delay of more than 15 min. After 7:00 a.m., 87% of cases started more than 10 min off schedule, with 26% being early and 74% late. Timeliness was 15 ± 72 min (mean ± SD) for first, 21 ± 84 min for second, and 25 ± 93 min for all to-follow cases, compared to preoperative day planning, and 21 ± 45, 23 ± 61, and 19 ± 74 min compared to 7:00 a.m. status. Start time deviations were also related to procedure duration, with cases of 61–90 min duration being most reliable (deviation 9.8 ± 67 min compared to 7:00 a.m.), regardless of order. In consequence, cases following after 61–90 min long cases had the shortest deviations of incision time from schedule (16 ± 66 min). Taken together, start times for elective surgery cases deviate substantially from schedule, with first and second cases falling into the highest mean deviation category. Second cases had the largest deviations from scheduled times compared to first and all to-follow cases. While planned vs. actual start times differ among specialties, cases of 61–90 min duration had the most reliable start times, with neither shorter nor longer cases seeming to improve timeliness of start times. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5406398/ /pubmed/28497037 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2017.00049 Text en Copyright © 2017 Balzer, Raackow, Hahnenkamp, Flessa and Meissner. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Balzer, Claudius
Raackow, David
Hahnenkamp, Klaus
Flessa, Steffen
Meissner, Konrad
Timeliness of Operating Room Case Planning and Time Utilization: Influence of First and To-Follow Cases
title Timeliness of Operating Room Case Planning and Time Utilization: Influence of First and To-Follow Cases
title_full Timeliness of Operating Room Case Planning and Time Utilization: Influence of First and To-Follow Cases
title_fullStr Timeliness of Operating Room Case Planning and Time Utilization: Influence of First and To-Follow Cases
title_full_unstemmed Timeliness of Operating Room Case Planning and Time Utilization: Influence of First and To-Follow Cases
title_short Timeliness of Operating Room Case Planning and Time Utilization: Influence of First and To-Follow Cases
title_sort timeliness of operating room case planning and time utilization: influence of first and to-follow cases
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5406398/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28497037
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2017.00049
work_keys_str_mv AT balzerclaudius timelinessofoperatingroomcaseplanningandtimeutilizationinfluenceoffirstandtofollowcases
AT raackowdavid timelinessofoperatingroomcaseplanningandtimeutilizationinfluenceoffirstandtofollowcases
AT hahnenkampklaus timelinessofoperatingroomcaseplanningandtimeutilizationinfluenceoffirstandtofollowcases
AT flessasteffen timelinessofoperatingroomcaseplanningandtimeutilizationinfluenceoffirstandtofollowcases
AT meissnerkonrad timelinessofoperatingroomcaseplanningandtimeutilizationinfluenceoffirstandtofollowcases