Cargando…
Safety of a killed oral cholera vaccine (Shanchol) in pregnant women in Malawi: an observational cohort study
BACKGROUND: Pregnancy increases the risk of harmful effects from cholera for both mothers and their fetuses. A killed oral cholera vaccine, Shanchol (Shantha Biotechnics, Hydrabad, India), can protect against the disease for up to 5 years. However, cholera vaccination campaigns have often excluded p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Science ;, The Lancet Pub. Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5406486/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28161570 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30523-0 |
_version_ | 1783231962192805888 |
---|---|
author | Ali, Mohammad Nelson, Allyson Luquero, Francisco J Azman, Andrew S Debes, Amanda K M'bang'ombe, Maurice Mwesawina Seyama, Linly Kachale, Evans Zuze, Kingsley Malichi, Desire Zulu, Fatima Msyamboza, Kelias Phiri Kabuluzi, Storn Sack, David A |
author_facet | Ali, Mohammad Nelson, Allyson Luquero, Francisco J Azman, Andrew S Debes, Amanda K M'bang'ombe, Maurice Mwesawina Seyama, Linly Kachale, Evans Zuze, Kingsley Malichi, Desire Zulu, Fatima Msyamboza, Kelias Phiri Kabuluzi, Storn Sack, David A |
author_sort | Ali, Mohammad |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Pregnancy increases the risk of harmful effects from cholera for both mothers and their fetuses. A killed oral cholera vaccine, Shanchol (Shantha Biotechnics, Hydrabad, India), can protect against the disease for up to 5 years. However, cholera vaccination campaigns have often excluded pregnant women because of insufficient safety data for use during pregnancy. We did an observational cohort study to assess the safety of Shanchol during pregnancy. METHODS: This observational cohort study was done in two adjacent districts (Nsanje and Chikwawa) in Malawi. Individuals older than 1 year in Nsanje were offered oral cholera vaccine during a mass vaccination campaign between March 30 and April 30, 2015, but no vaccines were administered in Chikwawa. We enrolled women who were exposed to oral cholera vaccine during pregnancy in Nsanje district, and women who were pregnant in Chikwawa district (and thus not exposed to oral cholera vaccine) during the same period. The primary endpoint of our analysis was pregnancy loss (spontaneous miscarriage or stillbirth), and the secondary endpoints were neonatal deaths and malformations. We evaluated these endpoints using log-binomial regression, adjusting for the imbalanced baseline characteristics between the groups. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02499172. FINDINGS: We recruited 900 women exposed to oral cholera vaccine and 899 women not exposed to the vaccine between June 16 and Oct 10, 2015, and analysed 835 in each group. 361 women exposed to the vaccine and 327 not exposed to the vaccine were recruited after their pregnancies had ended. The incidence of pregnancy loss was 27·54 (95% CI 18·41–41·23) per 1000 pregnancies among those exposed to the vaccine and 21·56 (13·65–34·04) per 1000 among those not exposed. The adjusted relative risk for pregnancy loss among those exposed to oral cholera vaccine was 1·24 (95% CI 0·64–2·43; p=0·52) compared with those not exposed to the vaccine. The neonatal mortality rate was 11·78 (95% CI 5·92–23·46) per 1000 livebirths for infants whose mothers were exposed to oral cholera vaccine versus 8·91 (4·02–19·77) per 1000 livebirths for infants whose mothers were not exposed to the vaccine (crude relative risk 1·32, 95% CI 0·46–3·84; p=0·60). Only three newborn babies had malformations, two in the vaccine exposure group and one in the no-exposure group, yielding a relative risk of 2·00 (95% CI 0·18–22·04; p=0·57), although this estimate is unreliable because of the small number of outcomes. INTERPRETATION: Our study provides evidence that fetal exposure to oral cholera vaccine confers no significantly increased risk of pregnancy loss, neonatal mortality, or malformation. These data, along with findings from two retrospective studies, support use of oral cholera vaccine in pregnant women in cholera-affected regions. FUNDING: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5406486 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Elsevier Science ;, The Lancet Pub. Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54064862017-05-05 Safety of a killed oral cholera vaccine (Shanchol) in pregnant women in Malawi: an observational cohort study Ali, Mohammad Nelson, Allyson Luquero, Francisco J Azman, Andrew S Debes, Amanda K M'bang'ombe, Maurice Mwesawina Seyama, Linly Kachale, Evans Zuze, Kingsley Malichi, Desire Zulu, Fatima Msyamboza, Kelias Phiri Kabuluzi, Storn Sack, David A Lancet Infect Dis Articles BACKGROUND: Pregnancy increases the risk of harmful effects from cholera for both mothers and their fetuses. A killed oral cholera vaccine, Shanchol (Shantha Biotechnics, Hydrabad, India), can protect against the disease for up to 5 years. However, cholera vaccination campaigns have often excluded pregnant women because of insufficient safety data for use during pregnancy. We did an observational cohort study to assess the safety of Shanchol during pregnancy. METHODS: This observational cohort study was done in two adjacent districts (Nsanje and Chikwawa) in Malawi. Individuals older than 1 year in Nsanje were offered oral cholera vaccine during a mass vaccination campaign between March 30 and April 30, 2015, but no vaccines were administered in Chikwawa. We enrolled women who were exposed to oral cholera vaccine during pregnancy in Nsanje district, and women who were pregnant in Chikwawa district (and thus not exposed to oral cholera vaccine) during the same period. The primary endpoint of our analysis was pregnancy loss (spontaneous miscarriage or stillbirth), and the secondary endpoints were neonatal deaths and malformations. We evaluated these endpoints using log-binomial regression, adjusting for the imbalanced baseline characteristics between the groups. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02499172. FINDINGS: We recruited 900 women exposed to oral cholera vaccine and 899 women not exposed to the vaccine between June 16 and Oct 10, 2015, and analysed 835 in each group. 361 women exposed to the vaccine and 327 not exposed to the vaccine were recruited after their pregnancies had ended. The incidence of pregnancy loss was 27·54 (95% CI 18·41–41·23) per 1000 pregnancies among those exposed to the vaccine and 21·56 (13·65–34·04) per 1000 among those not exposed. The adjusted relative risk for pregnancy loss among those exposed to oral cholera vaccine was 1·24 (95% CI 0·64–2·43; p=0·52) compared with those not exposed to the vaccine. The neonatal mortality rate was 11·78 (95% CI 5·92–23·46) per 1000 livebirths for infants whose mothers were exposed to oral cholera vaccine versus 8·91 (4·02–19·77) per 1000 livebirths for infants whose mothers were not exposed to the vaccine (crude relative risk 1·32, 95% CI 0·46–3·84; p=0·60). Only three newborn babies had malformations, two in the vaccine exposure group and one in the no-exposure group, yielding a relative risk of 2·00 (95% CI 0·18–22·04; p=0·57), although this estimate is unreliable because of the small number of outcomes. INTERPRETATION: Our study provides evidence that fetal exposure to oral cholera vaccine confers no significantly increased risk of pregnancy loss, neonatal mortality, or malformation. These data, along with findings from two retrospective studies, support use of oral cholera vaccine in pregnant women in cholera-affected regions. FUNDING: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Elsevier Science ;, The Lancet Pub. Group 2017-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5406486/ /pubmed/28161570 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30523-0 Text en © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Articles Ali, Mohammad Nelson, Allyson Luquero, Francisco J Azman, Andrew S Debes, Amanda K M'bang'ombe, Maurice Mwesawina Seyama, Linly Kachale, Evans Zuze, Kingsley Malichi, Desire Zulu, Fatima Msyamboza, Kelias Phiri Kabuluzi, Storn Sack, David A Safety of a killed oral cholera vaccine (Shanchol) in pregnant women in Malawi: an observational cohort study |
title | Safety of a killed oral cholera vaccine (Shanchol) in pregnant women in Malawi: an observational cohort study |
title_full | Safety of a killed oral cholera vaccine (Shanchol) in pregnant women in Malawi: an observational cohort study |
title_fullStr | Safety of a killed oral cholera vaccine (Shanchol) in pregnant women in Malawi: an observational cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety of a killed oral cholera vaccine (Shanchol) in pregnant women in Malawi: an observational cohort study |
title_short | Safety of a killed oral cholera vaccine (Shanchol) in pregnant women in Malawi: an observational cohort study |
title_sort | safety of a killed oral cholera vaccine (shanchol) in pregnant women in malawi: an observational cohort study |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5406486/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28161570 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30523-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alimohammad safetyofakilledoralcholeravaccineshancholinpregnantwomeninmalawianobservationalcohortstudy AT nelsonallyson safetyofakilledoralcholeravaccineshancholinpregnantwomeninmalawianobservationalcohortstudy AT luquerofranciscoj safetyofakilledoralcholeravaccineshancholinpregnantwomeninmalawianobservationalcohortstudy AT azmanandrews safetyofakilledoralcholeravaccineshancholinpregnantwomeninmalawianobservationalcohortstudy AT debesamandak safetyofakilledoralcholeravaccineshancholinpregnantwomeninmalawianobservationalcohortstudy AT mbangombemauricemwesawina safetyofakilledoralcholeravaccineshancholinpregnantwomeninmalawianobservationalcohortstudy AT seyamalinly safetyofakilledoralcholeravaccineshancholinpregnantwomeninmalawianobservationalcohortstudy AT kachaleevans safetyofakilledoralcholeravaccineshancholinpregnantwomeninmalawianobservationalcohortstudy AT zuzekingsley safetyofakilledoralcholeravaccineshancholinpregnantwomeninmalawianobservationalcohortstudy AT malichidesire safetyofakilledoralcholeravaccineshancholinpregnantwomeninmalawianobservationalcohortstudy AT zulufatima safetyofakilledoralcholeravaccineshancholinpregnantwomeninmalawianobservationalcohortstudy AT msyambozakeliasphiri safetyofakilledoralcholeravaccineshancholinpregnantwomeninmalawianobservationalcohortstudy AT kabuluzistorn safetyofakilledoralcholeravaccineshancholinpregnantwomeninmalawianobservationalcohortstudy AT sackdavida safetyofakilledoralcholeravaccineshancholinpregnantwomeninmalawianobservationalcohortstudy |