Cargando…

Comparison of Incidences of Intravascular Injection between Medial and Lateral Side Approaches during Traditional S1 Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection

Purpose. Intravascular injection rates are higher during traditional S1 transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI) compared with lumbar transforaminal injection. We compared the incidences of intravascular injection between the medial and lateral approaches to the S1 foramen during S1 TFESI....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Sang Jun, Kim, Shin Hyung, Kim, Seon Ju, Yoon, Duck Mi, Yoon, Kyung Bong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5406725/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28490942
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/6426802
_version_ 1783232014311227392
author Park, Sang Jun
Kim, Shin Hyung
Kim, Seon Ju
Yoon, Duck Mi
Yoon, Kyung Bong
author_facet Park, Sang Jun
Kim, Shin Hyung
Kim, Seon Ju
Yoon, Duck Mi
Yoon, Kyung Bong
author_sort Park, Sang Jun
collection PubMed
description Purpose. Intravascular injection rates are higher during traditional S1 transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI) compared with lumbar transforaminal injection. We compared the incidences of intravascular injection between the medial and lateral approaches to the S1 foramen during S1 TFESI. Materials and Methods. A total of 139 patients underwent one or more TFESIs (170 total injections). The patients received S1 TFESI by either medial or lateral side of S1 foramen under fluoroscopic anteroposterior view using digital subtraction method. The intravascular injection rates, epidural spread patterns, and contrast volumes required to reach the superior aspect of the L5-S1 intervertebral disc (SIVD) were compared between groups. Results. Intravascular injection rates during S1 TFESI were significantly lower in the medial approach compared with the lateral approach patients (4.9% versus 38.6%, resp., P < 0.001). The medial approach group had more epidural spread to the L5-S1 SIVD than the lateral group (82.1% versus 58.8%, resp.); lower contrast volume amounts were required to extend the L5-S1 SIVD (1.46 ± 0.48 versus 1.90 ± 0.62, resp.). Conclusion. During S1 TFESI, approaching the needle towards the medial part of the S1 foramen may reduce intravascular injection risk.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5406725
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54067252017-05-10 Comparison of Incidences of Intravascular Injection between Medial and Lateral Side Approaches during Traditional S1 Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection Park, Sang Jun Kim, Shin Hyung Kim, Seon Ju Yoon, Duck Mi Yoon, Kyung Bong Pain Res Manag Clinical Study Purpose. Intravascular injection rates are higher during traditional S1 transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI) compared with lumbar transforaminal injection. We compared the incidences of intravascular injection between the medial and lateral approaches to the S1 foramen during S1 TFESI. Materials and Methods. A total of 139 patients underwent one or more TFESIs (170 total injections). The patients received S1 TFESI by either medial or lateral side of S1 foramen under fluoroscopic anteroposterior view using digital subtraction method. The intravascular injection rates, epidural spread patterns, and contrast volumes required to reach the superior aspect of the L5-S1 intervertebral disc (SIVD) were compared between groups. Results. Intravascular injection rates during S1 TFESI were significantly lower in the medial approach compared with the lateral approach patients (4.9% versus 38.6%, resp., P < 0.001). The medial approach group had more epidural spread to the L5-S1 SIVD than the lateral group (82.1% versus 58.8%, resp.); lower contrast volume amounts were required to extend the L5-S1 SIVD (1.46 ± 0.48 versus 1.90 ± 0.62, resp.). Conclusion. During S1 TFESI, approaching the needle towards the medial part of the S1 foramen may reduce intravascular injection risk. Hindawi 2017 2017-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5406725/ /pubmed/28490942 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/6426802 Text en Copyright © 2017 Sang Jun Park et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Park, Sang Jun
Kim, Shin Hyung
Kim, Seon Ju
Yoon, Duck Mi
Yoon, Kyung Bong
Comparison of Incidences of Intravascular Injection between Medial and Lateral Side Approaches during Traditional S1 Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection
title Comparison of Incidences of Intravascular Injection between Medial and Lateral Side Approaches during Traditional S1 Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection
title_full Comparison of Incidences of Intravascular Injection between Medial and Lateral Side Approaches during Traditional S1 Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection
title_fullStr Comparison of Incidences of Intravascular Injection between Medial and Lateral Side Approaches during Traditional S1 Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Incidences of Intravascular Injection between Medial and Lateral Side Approaches during Traditional S1 Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection
title_short Comparison of Incidences of Intravascular Injection between Medial and Lateral Side Approaches during Traditional S1 Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection
title_sort comparison of incidences of intravascular injection between medial and lateral side approaches during traditional s1 transforaminal epidural steroid injection
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5406725/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28490942
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/6426802
work_keys_str_mv AT parksangjun comparisonofincidencesofintravascularinjectionbetweenmedialandlateralsideapproachesduringtraditionals1transforaminalepiduralsteroidinjection
AT kimshinhyung comparisonofincidencesofintravascularinjectionbetweenmedialandlateralsideapproachesduringtraditionals1transforaminalepiduralsteroidinjection
AT kimseonju comparisonofincidencesofintravascularinjectionbetweenmedialandlateralsideapproachesduringtraditionals1transforaminalepiduralsteroidinjection
AT yoonduckmi comparisonofincidencesofintravascularinjectionbetweenmedialandlateralsideapproachesduringtraditionals1transforaminalepiduralsteroidinjection
AT yoonkyungbong comparisonofincidencesofintravascularinjectionbetweenmedialandlateralsideapproachesduringtraditionals1transforaminalepiduralsteroidinjection