Cargando…
Comparison of Incidences of Intravascular Injection between Medial and Lateral Side Approaches during Traditional S1 Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection
Purpose. Intravascular injection rates are higher during traditional S1 transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI) compared with lumbar transforaminal injection. We compared the incidences of intravascular injection between the medial and lateral approaches to the S1 foramen during S1 TFESI....
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5406725/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28490942 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/6426802 |
_version_ | 1783232014311227392 |
---|---|
author | Park, Sang Jun Kim, Shin Hyung Kim, Seon Ju Yoon, Duck Mi Yoon, Kyung Bong |
author_facet | Park, Sang Jun Kim, Shin Hyung Kim, Seon Ju Yoon, Duck Mi Yoon, Kyung Bong |
author_sort | Park, Sang Jun |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose. Intravascular injection rates are higher during traditional S1 transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI) compared with lumbar transforaminal injection. We compared the incidences of intravascular injection between the medial and lateral approaches to the S1 foramen during S1 TFESI. Materials and Methods. A total of 139 patients underwent one or more TFESIs (170 total injections). The patients received S1 TFESI by either medial or lateral side of S1 foramen under fluoroscopic anteroposterior view using digital subtraction method. The intravascular injection rates, epidural spread patterns, and contrast volumes required to reach the superior aspect of the L5-S1 intervertebral disc (SIVD) were compared between groups. Results. Intravascular injection rates during S1 TFESI were significantly lower in the medial approach compared with the lateral approach patients (4.9% versus 38.6%, resp., P < 0.001). The medial approach group had more epidural spread to the L5-S1 SIVD than the lateral group (82.1% versus 58.8%, resp.); lower contrast volume amounts were required to extend the L5-S1 SIVD (1.46 ± 0.48 versus 1.90 ± 0.62, resp.). Conclusion. During S1 TFESI, approaching the needle towards the medial part of the S1 foramen may reduce intravascular injection risk. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5406725 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54067252017-05-10 Comparison of Incidences of Intravascular Injection between Medial and Lateral Side Approaches during Traditional S1 Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection Park, Sang Jun Kim, Shin Hyung Kim, Seon Ju Yoon, Duck Mi Yoon, Kyung Bong Pain Res Manag Clinical Study Purpose. Intravascular injection rates are higher during traditional S1 transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI) compared with lumbar transforaminal injection. We compared the incidences of intravascular injection between the medial and lateral approaches to the S1 foramen during S1 TFESI. Materials and Methods. A total of 139 patients underwent one or more TFESIs (170 total injections). The patients received S1 TFESI by either medial or lateral side of S1 foramen under fluoroscopic anteroposterior view using digital subtraction method. The intravascular injection rates, epidural spread patterns, and contrast volumes required to reach the superior aspect of the L5-S1 intervertebral disc (SIVD) were compared between groups. Results. Intravascular injection rates during S1 TFESI were significantly lower in the medial approach compared with the lateral approach patients (4.9% versus 38.6%, resp., P < 0.001). The medial approach group had more epidural spread to the L5-S1 SIVD than the lateral group (82.1% versus 58.8%, resp.); lower contrast volume amounts were required to extend the L5-S1 SIVD (1.46 ± 0.48 versus 1.90 ± 0.62, resp.). Conclusion. During S1 TFESI, approaching the needle towards the medial part of the S1 foramen may reduce intravascular injection risk. Hindawi 2017 2017-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5406725/ /pubmed/28490942 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/6426802 Text en Copyright © 2017 Sang Jun Park et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Park, Sang Jun Kim, Shin Hyung Kim, Seon Ju Yoon, Duck Mi Yoon, Kyung Bong Comparison of Incidences of Intravascular Injection between Medial and Lateral Side Approaches during Traditional S1 Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection |
title | Comparison of Incidences of Intravascular Injection between Medial and Lateral Side Approaches during Traditional S1 Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection |
title_full | Comparison of Incidences of Intravascular Injection between Medial and Lateral Side Approaches during Traditional S1 Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Incidences of Intravascular Injection between Medial and Lateral Side Approaches during Traditional S1 Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Incidences of Intravascular Injection between Medial and Lateral Side Approaches during Traditional S1 Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection |
title_short | Comparison of Incidences of Intravascular Injection between Medial and Lateral Side Approaches during Traditional S1 Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection |
title_sort | comparison of incidences of intravascular injection between medial and lateral side approaches during traditional s1 transforaminal epidural steroid injection |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5406725/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28490942 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/6426802 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parksangjun comparisonofincidencesofintravascularinjectionbetweenmedialandlateralsideapproachesduringtraditionals1transforaminalepiduralsteroidinjection AT kimshinhyung comparisonofincidencesofintravascularinjectionbetweenmedialandlateralsideapproachesduringtraditionals1transforaminalepiduralsteroidinjection AT kimseonju comparisonofincidencesofintravascularinjectionbetweenmedialandlateralsideapproachesduringtraditionals1transforaminalepiduralsteroidinjection AT yoonduckmi comparisonofincidencesofintravascularinjectionbetweenmedialandlateralsideapproachesduringtraditionals1transforaminalepiduralsteroidinjection AT yoonkyungbong comparisonofincidencesofintravascularinjectionbetweenmedialandlateralsideapproachesduringtraditionals1transforaminalepiduralsteroidinjection |