Cargando…
The effectiveness of a monetary incentive offer on survey response rates and response completeness in a longitudinal study
BACKGROUND: Achieving adequate response rates is an ongoing challenge for longitudinal studies. The World Trade Center Health Registry is a longitudinal health study that periodically surveys a cohort of ~71,000 people exposed to the 9/11 terrorist attacks in New York City. Since Wave 1, the Registr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5406995/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28446131 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0353-1 |
_version_ | 1783232076312477696 |
---|---|
author | Yu, Shengchao Alper, Howard E. Nguyen, Angela-Maithy Brackbill, Robert M. Turner, Lennon Walker, Deborah J. Maslow, Carey B. Zweig, Kimberly C. |
author_facet | Yu, Shengchao Alper, Howard E. Nguyen, Angela-Maithy Brackbill, Robert M. Turner, Lennon Walker, Deborah J. Maslow, Carey B. Zweig, Kimberly C. |
author_sort | Yu, Shengchao |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Achieving adequate response rates is an ongoing challenge for longitudinal studies. The World Trade Center Health Registry is a longitudinal health study that periodically surveys a cohort of ~71,000 people exposed to the 9/11 terrorist attacks in New York City. Since Wave 1, the Registry has conducted three follow-up surveys (Waves 2–4) every 3–4 years and utilized various strategies to increase survey participation. A promised monetary incentive was offered for the first time to survey non-respondents in the recent Wave 4 survey, conducted 13–14 years after 9/11. METHODS: We evaluated the effectiveness of a monetary incentive in improving the response rate five months after survey launch, and assessed whether or not response completeness was compromised due to incentive use. The study compared the likelihood of returning a survey for those who received an incentive offer to those who did not, using logistic regression models. Among those who returned surveys, we also examined whether those receiving an incentive notification had higher rate of response completeness than those who did not, using negative binomial regression models and logistic regression models. RESULTS: We found that a $10 monetary incentive offer was effective in increasing Wave 4 response rates. Specifically, the $10 incentive offer was useful in encouraging initially reluctant participants to respond to the survey. The likelihood of returning a survey increased by 30% for those who received an incentive offer (AOR = 1.3, 95% CI: 1.1, 1.4), and the incentive increased the number of returned surveys by 18%. Moreover, our results did not reveal any significant differences on response completeness between those who received an incentive offer and those who did not. CONCLUSIONS: In the face of the growing challenge of maintaining a high response rate for the World Trade Center Health Registry follow-up surveys, this study showed the value of offering a monetary incentive as an additional refusal conversion strategy. Our findings also suggest that an incentive offer could be particularly useful near the end of data collection period when an immediate boost in response rate is needed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5406995 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54069952017-05-02 The effectiveness of a monetary incentive offer on survey response rates and response completeness in a longitudinal study Yu, Shengchao Alper, Howard E. Nguyen, Angela-Maithy Brackbill, Robert M. Turner, Lennon Walker, Deborah J. Maslow, Carey B. Zweig, Kimberly C. BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: Achieving adequate response rates is an ongoing challenge for longitudinal studies. The World Trade Center Health Registry is a longitudinal health study that periodically surveys a cohort of ~71,000 people exposed to the 9/11 terrorist attacks in New York City. Since Wave 1, the Registry has conducted three follow-up surveys (Waves 2–4) every 3–4 years and utilized various strategies to increase survey participation. A promised monetary incentive was offered for the first time to survey non-respondents in the recent Wave 4 survey, conducted 13–14 years after 9/11. METHODS: We evaluated the effectiveness of a monetary incentive in improving the response rate five months after survey launch, and assessed whether or not response completeness was compromised due to incentive use. The study compared the likelihood of returning a survey for those who received an incentive offer to those who did not, using logistic regression models. Among those who returned surveys, we also examined whether those receiving an incentive notification had higher rate of response completeness than those who did not, using negative binomial regression models and logistic regression models. RESULTS: We found that a $10 monetary incentive offer was effective in increasing Wave 4 response rates. Specifically, the $10 incentive offer was useful in encouraging initially reluctant participants to respond to the survey. The likelihood of returning a survey increased by 30% for those who received an incentive offer (AOR = 1.3, 95% CI: 1.1, 1.4), and the incentive increased the number of returned surveys by 18%. Moreover, our results did not reveal any significant differences on response completeness between those who received an incentive offer and those who did not. CONCLUSIONS: In the face of the growing challenge of maintaining a high response rate for the World Trade Center Health Registry follow-up surveys, this study showed the value of offering a monetary incentive as an additional refusal conversion strategy. Our findings also suggest that an incentive offer could be particularly useful near the end of data collection period when an immediate boost in response rate is needed. BioMed Central 2017-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5406995/ /pubmed/28446131 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0353-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Yu, Shengchao Alper, Howard E. Nguyen, Angela-Maithy Brackbill, Robert M. Turner, Lennon Walker, Deborah J. Maslow, Carey B. Zweig, Kimberly C. The effectiveness of a monetary incentive offer on survey response rates and response completeness in a longitudinal study |
title | The effectiveness of a monetary incentive offer on survey response rates and response completeness in a longitudinal study |
title_full | The effectiveness of a monetary incentive offer on survey response rates and response completeness in a longitudinal study |
title_fullStr | The effectiveness of a monetary incentive offer on survey response rates and response completeness in a longitudinal study |
title_full_unstemmed | The effectiveness of a monetary incentive offer on survey response rates and response completeness in a longitudinal study |
title_short | The effectiveness of a monetary incentive offer on survey response rates and response completeness in a longitudinal study |
title_sort | effectiveness of a monetary incentive offer on survey response rates and response completeness in a longitudinal study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5406995/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28446131 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0353-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yushengchao theeffectivenessofamonetaryincentiveofferonsurveyresponseratesandresponsecompletenessinalongitudinalstudy AT alperhowarde theeffectivenessofamonetaryincentiveofferonsurveyresponseratesandresponsecompletenessinalongitudinalstudy AT nguyenangelamaithy theeffectivenessofamonetaryincentiveofferonsurveyresponseratesandresponsecompletenessinalongitudinalstudy AT brackbillrobertm theeffectivenessofamonetaryincentiveofferonsurveyresponseratesandresponsecompletenessinalongitudinalstudy AT turnerlennon theeffectivenessofamonetaryincentiveofferonsurveyresponseratesandresponsecompletenessinalongitudinalstudy AT walkerdeborahj theeffectivenessofamonetaryincentiveofferonsurveyresponseratesandresponsecompletenessinalongitudinalstudy AT maslowcareyb theeffectivenessofamonetaryincentiveofferonsurveyresponseratesandresponsecompletenessinalongitudinalstudy AT zweigkimberlyc theeffectivenessofamonetaryincentiveofferonsurveyresponseratesandresponsecompletenessinalongitudinalstudy AT yushengchao effectivenessofamonetaryincentiveofferonsurveyresponseratesandresponsecompletenessinalongitudinalstudy AT alperhowarde effectivenessofamonetaryincentiveofferonsurveyresponseratesandresponsecompletenessinalongitudinalstudy AT nguyenangelamaithy effectivenessofamonetaryincentiveofferonsurveyresponseratesandresponsecompletenessinalongitudinalstudy AT brackbillrobertm effectivenessofamonetaryincentiveofferonsurveyresponseratesandresponsecompletenessinalongitudinalstudy AT turnerlennon effectivenessofamonetaryincentiveofferonsurveyresponseratesandresponsecompletenessinalongitudinalstudy AT walkerdeborahj effectivenessofamonetaryincentiveofferonsurveyresponseratesandresponsecompletenessinalongitudinalstudy AT maslowcareyb effectivenessofamonetaryincentiveofferonsurveyresponseratesandresponsecompletenessinalongitudinalstudy AT zweigkimberlyc effectivenessofamonetaryincentiveofferonsurveyresponseratesandresponsecompletenessinalongitudinalstudy |