Cargando…
Validity of low-contrast letter acuity as a visual performance outcome measure for multiple sclerosis
Low-contrast letter acuity (LCLA) has emerged as the leading outcome measure to assess visual disability in multiple sclerosis (MS) research. As visual dysfunction is one of the most common manifestations of MS, sensitive visual outcome measures are important in examining the effect of treatment. Lo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5407511/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28206829 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1352458517690822 |
_version_ | 1783232144490889216 |
---|---|
author | Balcer, Laura J Raynowska, Jenelle Nolan, Rachel Galetta, Steven L Kapoor, Raju Benedict, Ralph Phillips, Glenn LaRocca, Nicholas Hudson, Lynn Rudick, Richard |
author_facet | Balcer, Laura J Raynowska, Jenelle Nolan, Rachel Galetta, Steven L Kapoor, Raju Benedict, Ralph Phillips, Glenn LaRocca, Nicholas Hudson, Lynn Rudick, Richard |
author_sort | Balcer, Laura J |
collection | PubMed |
description | Low-contrast letter acuity (LCLA) has emerged as the leading outcome measure to assess visual disability in multiple sclerosis (MS) research. As visual dysfunction is one of the most common manifestations of MS, sensitive visual outcome measures are important in examining the effect of treatment. Low-contrast acuity captures visual loss not seen in high-contrast visual acuity (HCVA) measurements. These issues are addressed by the MS Outcome Assessments Consortium (MSOAC), including representatives from advocacy organizations, Food and Drug Administration (FDA), European Medicines Agency (EMA), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), academic institutions, and industry partners along with persons living with MS. MSOAC goals are acceptance and qualification by regulators of performance outcomes that are highly reliable and valid, practical, cost-effective, and meaningful to persons with MS. A critical step is elucidation of clinically relevant benchmarks, well-defined degrees of disability, and gradients of change that are clinically meaningful. This review shows that MS and disease-free controls have similar median HCVA, while MS patients have significantly lower LCLA. Deficits in LCLA and vision-specific quality of life are found many years after an episode of acute optic neuritis, even when HCVA has recovered. Studies reveal correlations between LCLA and the Expanded Disability Status Score (EDSS), Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC), retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and ganglion cell layer plus inner plexiform layer (GCL + IPL) thickness on optical coherence tomography (OCT), brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), visual evoked potential (VEP), electroretinogram (ERG), pupillary function, and King-Devick testing. This review also concludes that a 7-point change in LCLA is clinically meaningful. The overall goal of this review is to describe and characterize the LCLA metric for research and clinical use among persons with MS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5407511 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54075112017-05-08 Validity of low-contrast letter acuity as a visual performance outcome measure for multiple sclerosis Balcer, Laura J Raynowska, Jenelle Nolan, Rachel Galetta, Steven L Kapoor, Raju Benedict, Ralph Phillips, Glenn LaRocca, Nicholas Hudson, Lynn Rudick, Richard Mult Scler Invited Reviews Low-contrast letter acuity (LCLA) has emerged as the leading outcome measure to assess visual disability in multiple sclerosis (MS) research. As visual dysfunction is one of the most common manifestations of MS, sensitive visual outcome measures are important in examining the effect of treatment. Low-contrast acuity captures visual loss not seen in high-contrast visual acuity (HCVA) measurements. These issues are addressed by the MS Outcome Assessments Consortium (MSOAC), including representatives from advocacy organizations, Food and Drug Administration (FDA), European Medicines Agency (EMA), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), academic institutions, and industry partners along with persons living with MS. MSOAC goals are acceptance and qualification by regulators of performance outcomes that are highly reliable and valid, practical, cost-effective, and meaningful to persons with MS. A critical step is elucidation of clinically relevant benchmarks, well-defined degrees of disability, and gradients of change that are clinically meaningful. This review shows that MS and disease-free controls have similar median HCVA, while MS patients have significantly lower LCLA. Deficits in LCLA and vision-specific quality of life are found many years after an episode of acute optic neuritis, even when HCVA has recovered. Studies reveal correlations between LCLA and the Expanded Disability Status Score (EDSS), Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC), retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and ganglion cell layer plus inner plexiform layer (GCL + IPL) thickness on optical coherence tomography (OCT), brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), visual evoked potential (VEP), electroretinogram (ERG), pupillary function, and King-Devick testing. This review also concludes that a 7-point change in LCLA is clinically meaningful. The overall goal of this review is to describe and characterize the LCLA metric for research and clinical use among persons with MS. SAGE Publications 2017-02-16 2017-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5407511/ /pubmed/28206829 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1352458517690822 Text en © The Author(s), 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Invited Reviews Balcer, Laura J Raynowska, Jenelle Nolan, Rachel Galetta, Steven L Kapoor, Raju Benedict, Ralph Phillips, Glenn LaRocca, Nicholas Hudson, Lynn Rudick, Richard Validity of low-contrast letter acuity as a visual performance outcome measure for multiple sclerosis |
title | Validity of low-contrast letter acuity as a visual performance outcome measure for multiple sclerosis |
title_full | Validity of low-contrast letter acuity as a visual performance outcome measure for multiple sclerosis |
title_fullStr | Validity of low-contrast letter acuity as a visual performance outcome measure for multiple sclerosis |
title_full_unstemmed | Validity of low-contrast letter acuity as a visual performance outcome measure for multiple sclerosis |
title_short | Validity of low-contrast letter acuity as a visual performance outcome measure for multiple sclerosis |
title_sort | validity of low-contrast letter acuity as a visual performance outcome measure for multiple sclerosis |
topic | Invited Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5407511/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28206829 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1352458517690822 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT balcerlauraj validityoflowcontrastletteracuityasavisualperformanceoutcomemeasureformultiplesclerosis AT raynowskajenelle validityoflowcontrastletteracuityasavisualperformanceoutcomemeasureformultiplesclerosis AT nolanrachel validityoflowcontrastletteracuityasavisualperformanceoutcomemeasureformultiplesclerosis AT galettastevenl validityoflowcontrastletteracuityasavisualperformanceoutcomemeasureformultiplesclerosis AT kapoorraju validityoflowcontrastletteracuityasavisualperformanceoutcomemeasureformultiplesclerosis AT benedictralph validityoflowcontrastletteracuityasavisualperformanceoutcomemeasureformultiplesclerosis AT phillipsglenn validityoflowcontrastletteracuityasavisualperformanceoutcomemeasureformultiplesclerosis AT laroccanicholas validityoflowcontrastletteracuityasavisualperformanceoutcomemeasureformultiplesclerosis AT hudsonlynn validityoflowcontrastletteracuityasavisualperformanceoutcomemeasureformultiplesclerosis AT rudickrichard validityoflowcontrastletteracuityasavisualperformanceoutcomemeasureformultiplesclerosis AT validityoflowcontrastletteracuityasavisualperformanceoutcomemeasureformultiplesclerosis |