Cargando…

Reconstructing grassland fire history using sedimentary charcoal: Considering count, size and shape

Fire is a key Earth system process, with 80% of annual fire activity taking place in grassland areas. However, past fire regimes in grassland systems have been difficult to quantify due to challenges in interpreting the charcoal signal in depositional environments. To improve reconstructions of gras...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leys, Berangere A., Commerford, Julie L., McLauchlan, Kendra K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5407794/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28448597
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176445
_version_ 1783232182404251648
author Leys, Berangere A.
Commerford, Julie L.
McLauchlan, Kendra K.
author_facet Leys, Berangere A.
Commerford, Julie L.
McLauchlan, Kendra K.
author_sort Leys, Berangere A.
collection PubMed
description Fire is a key Earth system process, with 80% of annual fire activity taking place in grassland areas. However, past fire regimes in grassland systems have been difficult to quantify due to challenges in interpreting the charcoal signal in depositional environments. To improve reconstructions of grassland fire regimes, it is essential to assess two key traits: (1) charcoal count, and (2) charcoal shape. In this study, we quantified the number of charcoal pieces in 51 sediment samples of ponds in the Great Plains and tested its relevance as a proxy for the fire regime by examining 13 potential factors influencing charcoal count, including various fire regime components (e.g. the fire frequency, the area burned, and the fire season), vegetation cover and pollen assemblages, and climate variables. We also quantified the width to length (W:L) ratio of charcoal particles, to assess its utility as a proxy of fuel types in grassland environments by direct comparison with vegetation cover and pollen assemblages. Our first conclusion is that charcoal particles produced by grassland fires are smaller than those produced by forest fires. Thus, a mesh size of 120μm as used in forested environments is too large for grassland ecosystems. We recommend counting all charcoal particles over 60μm in grasslands and mixed grass-forest environments to increase the number of samples with useful data. Second, a W:L ratio of 0.5 or smaller appears to be an indicator for fuel types, when vegetation surrounding the site is before composed of at least 40% grassland vegetation. Third, the area burned within 1060m of the depositional environments explained both the count and the area of charcoal particles. Therefore, changes in charcoal count or charcoal area through time indicate a change in area burned. The fire regimes of grassland systems, including both human and climatic influences on fire behavior, can be characterized by long-term charcoal records.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5407794
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54077942017-05-14 Reconstructing grassland fire history using sedimentary charcoal: Considering count, size and shape Leys, Berangere A. Commerford, Julie L. McLauchlan, Kendra K. PLoS One Research Article Fire is a key Earth system process, with 80% of annual fire activity taking place in grassland areas. However, past fire regimes in grassland systems have been difficult to quantify due to challenges in interpreting the charcoal signal in depositional environments. To improve reconstructions of grassland fire regimes, it is essential to assess two key traits: (1) charcoal count, and (2) charcoal shape. In this study, we quantified the number of charcoal pieces in 51 sediment samples of ponds in the Great Plains and tested its relevance as a proxy for the fire regime by examining 13 potential factors influencing charcoal count, including various fire regime components (e.g. the fire frequency, the area burned, and the fire season), vegetation cover and pollen assemblages, and climate variables. We also quantified the width to length (W:L) ratio of charcoal particles, to assess its utility as a proxy of fuel types in grassland environments by direct comparison with vegetation cover and pollen assemblages. Our first conclusion is that charcoal particles produced by grassland fires are smaller than those produced by forest fires. Thus, a mesh size of 120μm as used in forested environments is too large for grassland ecosystems. We recommend counting all charcoal particles over 60μm in grasslands and mixed grass-forest environments to increase the number of samples with useful data. Second, a W:L ratio of 0.5 or smaller appears to be an indicator for fuel types, when vegetation surrounding the site is before composed of at least 40% grassland vegetation. Third, the area burned within 1060m of the depositional environments explained both the count and the area of charcoal particles. Therefore, changes in charcoal count or charcoal area through time indicate a change in area burned. The fire regimes of grassland systems, including both human and climatic influences on fire behavior, can be characterized by long-term charcoal records. Public Library of Science 2017-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5407794/ /pubmed/28448597 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176445 Text en © 2017 Leys et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Leys, Berangere A.
Commerford, Julie L.
McLauchlan, Kendra K.
Reconstructing grassland fire history using sedimentary charcoal: Considering count, size and shape
title Reconstructing grassland fire history using sedimentary charcoal: Considering count, size and shape
title_full Reconstructing grassland fire history using sedimentary charcoal: Considering count, size and shape
title_fullStr Reconstructing grassland fire history using sedimentary charcoal: Considering count, size and shape
title_full_unstemmed Reconstructing grassland fire history using sedimentary charcoal: Considering count, size and shape
title_short Reconstructing grassland fire history using sedimentary charcoal: Considering count, size and shape
title_sort reconstructing grassland fire history using sedimentary charcoal: considering count, size and shape
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5407794/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28448597
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176445
work_keys_str_mv AT leysberangerea reconstructinggrasslandfirehistoryusingsedimentarycharcoalconsideringcountsizeandshape
AT commerfordjuliel reconstructinggrasslandfirehistoryusingsedimentarycharcoalconsideringcountsizeandshape
AT mclauchlankendrak reconstructinggrasslandfirehistoryusingsedimentarycharcoalconsideringcountsizeandshape