Cargando…

Low-tube-voltage selection for triple-rule-out CTA: relation to patient size

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the relationship between image quality and patient size at 100 kilovoltage (kV) compared to 120 kV ECG-gated Triple-Rule-Out CT angiography (TRO-CTA). METHODS: We retrospectively included 73 patients (age 64 ± 14 years) who underwent retrospective ECG-gated chest CTA. 40 p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Takx, Richard A. P., Krissak, Radko, Fink, Christian, Bachmann, Valentin, Henzler, Thomas, Meyer, Mathias, Nance, John W., Schoenberg, Stefan O., Apfaltrer, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5408040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27686566
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4607-9
_version_ 1783232218356776960
author Takx, Richard A. P.
Krissak, Radko
Fink, Christian
Bachmann, Valentin
Henzler, Thomas
Meyer, Mathias
Nance, John W.
Schoenberg, Stefan O.
Apfaltrer, Paul
author_facet Takx, Richard A. P.
Krissak, Radko
Fink, Christian
Bachmann, Valentin
Henzler, Thomas
Meyer, Mathias
Nance, John W.
Schoenberg, Stefan O.
Apfaltrer, Paul
author_sort Takx, Richard A. P.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To investigate the relationship between image quality and patient size at 100 kilovoltage (kV) compared to 120 kV ECG-gated Triple-Rule-Out CT angiography (TRO-CTA). METHODS: We retrospectively included 73 patients (age 64 ± 14 years) who underwent retrospective ECG-gated chest CTA. 40 patients were scanned with 100 kV while 33 patients with 120 kV. Body mass index (BMI), patients’ chest circumference (PC) and thoracic surface area (TSA) were recorded. Quantitative image quality was assessed as vascular attenuation in the ascending aorta (AA), pulmonary trunk (PA) and left coronary artery (LCA) and the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in the AA. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in BMI (26.0 ± 4.6 vs. 28.0 ± 6.7 kg/m(2)), PC (103 ± 7 vs. 104 ± 10 cm(2)) and TSA (92 ± 15 vs. 91 ± 19 cm(2)) between 100 kV and 120 kV group. Mean vascular attenuation was significantly higher in the 100 kV compared to the 120 kV group (AA 438 vs. 354 HU, PA 460 vs. 349 HU, LCA 370 vs. 299 HU all p < 0.001). SNR was not significantly different, even after adjusting for patient size. Radiation dose was significantly lower in the 100 kV group (10.7 ± 4.1 vs. 20.7 ± 10.7 mSv; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: 100 kV TRO-CTA is feasible in normal-to-overweight patients while maintaining image quality and achieving substantial dose reduction. KEY POINTS: • 100 kV protocols result in a significantly lower radiation dose. • Mean vascular attenuation is significantly higher using 100 kV. • SNR and CNR are not significantly different between 100 kV and 120 kV. • 100 kV CTA is feasible regardless of patient size while maintaining image quality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5408040
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54080402017-05-15 Low-tube-voltage selection for triple-rule-out CTA: relation to patient size Takx, Richard A. P. Krissak, Radko Fink, Christian Bachmann, Valentin Henzler, Thomas Meyer, Mathias Nance, John W. Schoenberg, Stefan O. Apfaltrer, Paul Eur Radiol Chest OBJECTIVES: To investigate the relationship between image quality and patient size at 100 kilovoltage (kV) compared to 120 kV ECG-gated Triple-Rule-Out CT angiography (TRO-CTA). METHODS: We retrospectively included 73 patients (age 64 ± 14 years) who underwent retrospective ECG-gated chest CTA. 40 patients were scanned with 100 kV while 33 patients with 120 kV. Body mass index (BMI), patients’ chest circumference (PC) and thoracic surface area (TSA) were recorded. Quantitative image quality was assessed as vascular attenuation in the ascending aorta (AA), pulmonary trunk (PA) and left coronary artery (LCA) and the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in the AA. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in BMI (26.0 ± 4.6 vs. 28.0 ± 6.7 kg/m(2)), PC (103 ± 7 vs. 104 ± 10 cm(2)) and TSA (92 ± 15 vs. 91 ± 19 cm(2)) between 100 kV and 120 kV group. Mean vascular attenuation was significantly higher in the 100 kV compared to the 120 kV group (AA 438 vs. 354 HU, PA 460 vs. 349 HU, LCA 370 vs. 299 HU all p < 0.001). SNR was not significantly different, even after adjusting for patient size. Radiation dose was significantly lower in the 100 kV group (10.7 ± 4.1 vs. 20.7 ± 10.7 mSv; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: 100 kV TRO-CTA is feasible in normal-to-overweight patients while maintaining image quality and achieving substantial dose reduction. KEY POINTS: • 100 kV protocols result in a significantly lower radiation dose. • Mean vascular attenuation is significantly higher using 100 kV. • SNR and CNR are not significantly different between 100 kV and 120 kV. • 100 kV CTA is feasible regardless of patient size while maintaining image quality. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-09-29 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5408040/ /pubmed/27686566 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4607-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Chest
Takx, Richard A. P.
Krissak, Radko
Fink, Christian
Bachmann, Valentin
Henzler, Thomas
Meyer, Mathias
Nance, John W.
Schoenberg, Stefan O.
Apfaltrer, Paul
Low-tube-voltage selection for triple-rule-out CTA: relation to patient size
title Low-tube-voltage selection for triple-rule-out CTA: relation to patient size
title_full Low-tube-voltage selection for triple-rule-out CTA: relation to patient size
title_fullStr Low-tube-voltage selection for triple-rule-out CTA: relation to patient size
title_full_unstemmed Low-tube-voltage selection for triple-rule-out CTA: relation to patient size
title_short Low-tube-voltage selection for triple-rule-out CTA: relation to patient size
title_sort low-tube-voltage selection for triple-rule-out cta: relation to patient size
topic Chest
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5408040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27686566
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4607-9
work_keys_str_mv AT takxrichardap lowtubevoltageselectionfortripleruleoutctarelationtopatientsize
AT krissakradko lowtubevoltageselectionfortripleruleoutctarelationtopatientsize
AT finkchristian lowtubevoltageselectionfortripleruleoutctarelationtopatientsize
AT bachmannvalentin lowtubevoltageselectionfortripleruleoutctarelationtopatientsize
AT henzlerthomas lowtubevoltageselectionfortripleruleoutctarelationtopatientsize
AT meyermathias lowtubevoltageselectionfortripleruleoutctarelationtopatientsize
AT nancejohnw lowtubevoltageselectionfortripleruleoutctarelationtopatientsize
AT schoenbergstefano lowtubevoltageselectionfortripleruleoutctarelationtopatientsize
AT apfaltrerpaul lowtubevoltageselectionfortripleruleoutctarelationtopatientsize