Cargando…

A systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the contribution of mr imaging to the diagnosis of foetal brain abnormalities In Utero

OBJECTIVES: This systematic review was undertaken to define the diagnostic performance of in utero MR (iuMR) imaging when attempting to confirm, exclude or provide additional information compared with the information provided by prenatal ultrasound scans (USS) when there is a suspicion of foetal bra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jarvis, Debbie, Mooney, Cara, Cohen, Judith, Papaioannou, Diana, Bradburn, Mike, Sutton, Anthea, Griffiths, Paul D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5408056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27655301
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4563-4
_version_ 1783232222302568448
author Jarvis, Debbie
Mooney, Cara
Cohen, Judith
Papaioannou, Diana
Bradburn, Mike
Sutton, Anthea
Griffiths, Paul D.
author_facet Jarvis, Debbie
Mooney, Cara
Cohen, Judith
Papaioannou, Diana
Bradburn, Mike
Sutton, Anthea
Griffiths, Paul D.
author_sort Jarvis, Debbie
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This systematic review was undertaken to define the diagnostic performance of in utero MR (iuMR) imaging when attempting to confirm, exclude or provide additional information compared with the information provided by prenatal ultrasound scans (USS) when there is a suspicion of foetal brain abnormality. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched as well as relevant journals and conference proceedings. Reference lists of applicable studies were also explored. Data extraction was conducted by two reviewers independently to identify relevant studies for inclusion in the review. Inclusion criteria were original research that reported the findings of prenatal USS and iuMR imaging and findings in terms of accuracy as judged by an outcome reference diagnosis for foetal brain abnormalities. RESULTS: 34 studies met the inclusion criteria which allowed diagnostic accuracy to be calculated in 959 cases, all of which had an outcome reference diagnosis determined by postnatal imaging, surgery or autopsy. iuMR imaging gave the correct diagnosis in 91 % which was an increase of 16 % above that achieved by USS alone. CONCLUSION: iuMR imaging makes a significant contribution to the diagnosis of foetal brain abnormalities, increasing the diagnostic accuracy achievable by USS alone. KEY POINTS: • Ultrasound is the primary modality for monitoring foetal brain development during pregnancy • iuMRI used together with ultrasound is more accurate for detecting foetal brain abnormalities • iuMR imaging is most helpful for detecting midline brain abnormalities • The moderate heterogeneity of reviewed studies may compromise findings
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5408056
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54080562017-05-15 A systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the contribution of mr imaging to the diagnosis of foetal brain abnormalities In Utero Jarvis, Debbie Mooney, Cara Cohen, Judith Papaioannou, Diana Bradburn, Mike Sutton, Anthea Griffiths, Paul D. Eur Radiol Magnetic Resonance OBJECTIVES: This systematic review was undertaken to define the diagnostic performance of in utero MR (iuMR) imaging when attempting to confirm, exclude or provide additional information compared with the information provided by prenatal ultrasound scans (USS) when there is a suspicion of foetal brain abnormality. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched as well as relevant journals and conference proceedings. Reference lists of applicable studies were also explored. Data extraction was conducted by two reviewers independently to identify relevant studies for inclusion in the review. Inclusion criteria were original research that reported the findings of prenatal USS and iuMR imaging and findings in terms of accuracy as judged by an outcome reference diagnosis for foetal brain abnormalities. RESULTS: 34 studies met the inclusion criteria which allowed diagnostic accuracy to be calculated in 959 cases, all of which had an outcome reference diagnosis determined by postnatal imaging, surgery or autopsy. iuMR imaging gave the correct diagnosis in 91 % which was an increase of 16 % above that achieved by USS alone. CONCLUSION: iuMR imaging makes a significant contribution to the diagnosis of foetal brain abnormalities, increasing the diagnostic accuracy achievable by USS alone. KEY POINTS: • Ultrasound is the primary modality for monitoring foetal brain development during pregnancy • iuMRI used together with ultrasound is more accurate for detecting foetal brain abnormalities • iuMR imaging is most helpful for detecting midline brain abnormalities • The moderate heterogeneity of reviewed studies may compromise findings Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-09-21 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5408056/ /pubmed/27655301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4563-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Magnetic Resonance
Jarvis, Debbie
Mooney, Cara
Cohen, Judith
Papaioannou, Diana
Bradburn, Mike
Sutton, Anthea
Griffiths, Paul D.
A systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the contribution of mr imaging to the diagnosis of foetal brain abnormalities In Utero
title A systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the contribution of mr imaging to the diagnosis of foetal brain abnormalities In Utero
title_full A systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the contribution of mr imaging to the diagnosis of foetal brain abnormalities In Utero
title_fullStr A systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the contribution of mr imaging to the diagnosis of foetal brain abnormalities In Utero
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the contribution of mr imaging to the diagnosis of foetal brain abnormalities In Utero
title_short A systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the contribution of mr imaging to the diagnosis of foetal brain abnormalities In Utero
title_sort systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the contribution of mr imaging to the diagnosis of foetal brain abnormalities in utero
topic Magnetic Resonance
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5408056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27655301
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4563-4
work_keys_str_mv AT jarvisdebbie asystematicreviewandmetaanalysistodeterminethecontributionofmrimagingtothediagnosisoffoetalbrainabnormalitiesinutero
AT mooneycara asystematicreviewandmetaanalysistodeterminethecontributionofmrimagingtothediagnosisoffoetalbrainabnormalitiesinutero
AT cohenjudith asystematicreviewandmetaanalysistodeterminethecontributionofmrimagingtothediagnosisoffoetalbrainabnormalitiesinutero
AT papaioannoudiana asystematicreviewandmetaanalysistodeterminethecontributionofmrimagingtothediagnosisoffoetalbrainabnormalitiesinutero
AT bradburnmike asystematicreviewandmetaanalysistodeterminethecontributionofmrimagingtothediagnosisoffoetalbrainabnormalitiesinutero
AT suttonanthea asystematicreviewandmetaanalysistodeterminethecontributionofmrimagingtothediagnosisoffoetalbrainabnormalitiesinutero
AT griffithspauld asystematicreviewandmetaanalysistodeterminethecontributionofmrimagingtothediagnosisoffoetalbrainabnormalitiesinutero
AT jarvisdebbie systematicreviewandmetaanalysistodeterminethecontributionofmrimagingtothediagnosisoffoetalbrainabnormalitiesinutero
AT mooneycara systematicreviewandmetaanalysistodeterminethecontributionofmrimagingtothediagnosisoffoetalbrainabnormalitiesinutero
AT cohenjudith systematicreviewandmetaanalysistodeterminethecontributionofmrimagingtothediagnosisoffoetalbrainabnormalitiesinutero
AT papaioannoudiana systematicreviewandmetaanalysistodeterminethecontributionofmrimagingtothediagnosisoffoetalbrainabnormalitiesinutero
AT bradburnmike systematicreviewandmetaanalysistodeterminethecontributionofmrimagingtothediagnosisoffoetalbrainabnormalitiesinutero
AT suttonanthea systematicreviewandmetaanalysistodeterminethecontributionofmrimagingtothediagnosisoffoetalbrainabnormalitiesinutero
AT griffithspauld systematicreviewandmetaanalysistodeterminethecontributionofmrimagingtothediagnosisoffoetalbrainabnormalitiesinutero