Cargando…
A systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the contribution of mr imaging to the diagnosis of foetal brain abnormalities In Utero
OBJECTIVES: This systematic review was undertaken to define the diagnostic performance of in utero MR (iuMR) imaging when attempting to confirm, exclude or provide additional information compared with the information provided by prenatal ultrasound scans (USS) when there is a suspicion of foetal bra...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5408056/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27655301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4563-4 |
_version_ | 1783232222302568448 |
---|---|
author | Jarvis, Debbie Mooney, Cara Cohen, Judith Papaioannou, Diana Bradburn, Mike Sutton, Anthea Griffiths, Paul D. |
author_facet | Jarvis, Debbie Mooney, Cara Cohen, Judith Papaioannou, Diana Bradburn, Mike Sutton, Anthea Griffiths, Paul D. |
author_sort | Jarvis, Debbie |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: This systematic review was undertaken to define the diagnostic performance of in utero MR (iuMR) imaging when attempting to confirm, exclude or provide additional information compared with the information provided by prenatal ultrasound scans (USS) when there is a suspicion of foetal brain abnormality. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched as well as relevant journals and conference proceedings. Reference lists of applicable studies were also explored. Data extraction was conducted by two reviewers independently to identify relevant studies for inclusion in the review. Inclusion criteria were original research that reported the findings of prenatal USS and iuMR imaging and findings in terms of accuracy as judged by an outcome reference diagnosis for foetal brain abnormalities. RESULTS: 34 studies met the inclusion criteria which allowed diagnostic accuracy to be calculated in 959 cases, all of which had an outcome reference diagnosis determined by postnatal imaging, surgery or autopsy. iuMR imaging gave the correct diagnosis in 91 % which was an increase of 16 % above that achieved by USS alone. CONCLUSION: iuMR imaging makes a significant contribution to the diagnosis of foetal brain abnormalities, increasing the diagnostic accuracy achievable by USS alone. KEY POINTS: • Ultrasound is the primary modality for monitoring foetal brain development during pregnancy • iuMRI used together with ultrasound is more accurate for detecting foetal brain abnormalities • iuMR imaging is most helpful for detecting midline brain abnormalities • The moderate heterogeneity of reviewed studies may compromise findings |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5408056 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54080562017-05-15 A systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the contribution of mr imaging to the diagnosis of foetal brain abnormalities In Utero Jarvis, Debbie Mooney, Cara Cohen, Judith Papaioannou, Diana Bradburn, Mike Sutton, Anthea Griffiths, Paul D. Eur Radiol Magnetic Resonance OBJECTIVES: This systematic review was undertaken to define the diagnostic performance of in utero MR (iuMR) imaging when attempting to confirm, exclude or provide additional information compared with the information provided by prenatal ultrasound scans (USS) when there is a suspicion of foetal brain abnormality. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched as well as relevant journals and conference proceedings. Reference lists of applicable studies were also explored. Data extraction was conducted by two reviewers independently to identify relevant studies for inclusion in the review. Inclusion criteria were original research that reported the findings of prenatal USS and iuMR imaging and findings in terms of accuracy as judged by an outcome reference diagnosis for foetal brain abnormalities. RESULTS: 34 studies met the inclusion criteria which allowed diagnostic accuracy to be calculated in 959 cases, all of which had an outcome reference diagnosis determined by postnatal imaging, surgery or autopsy. iuMR imaging gave the correct diagnosis in 91 % which was an increase of 16 % above that achieved by USS alone. CONCLUSION: iuMR imaging makes a significant contribution to the diagnosis of foetal brain abnormalities, increasing the diagnostic accuracy achievable by USS alone. KEY POINTS: • Ultrasound is the primary modality for monitoring foetal brain development during pregnancy • iuMRI used together with ultrasound is more accurate for detecting foetal brain abnormalities • iuMR imaging is most helpful for detecting midline brain abnormalities • The moderate heterogeneity of reviewed studies may compromise findings Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-09-21 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5408056/ /pubmed/27655301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4563-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Magnetic Resonance Jarvis, Debbie Mooney, Cara Cohen, Judith Papaioannou, Diana Bradburn, Mike Sutton, Anthea Griffiths, Paul D. A systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the contribution of mr imaging to the diagnosis of foetal brain abnormalities In Utero |
title | A systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the contribution of mr imaging to the diagnosis of foetal brain abnormalities In Utero |
title_full | A systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the contribution of mr imaging to the diagnosis of foetal brain abnormalities In Utero |
title_fullStr | A systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the contribution of mr imaging to the diagnosis of foetal brain abnormalities In Utero |
title_full_unstemmed | A systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the contribution of mr imaging to the diagnosis of foetal brain abnormalities In Utero |
title_short | A systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the contribution of mr imaging to the diagnosis of foetal brain abnormalities In Utero |
title_sort | systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the contribution of mr imaging to the diagnosis of foetal brain abnormalities in utero |
topic | Magnetic Resonance |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5408056/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27655301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4563-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jarvisdebbie asystematicreviewandmetaanalysistodeterminethecontributionofmrimagingtothediagnosisoffoetalbrainabnormalitiesinutero AT mooneycara asystematicreviewandmetaanalysistodeterminethecontributionofmrimagingtothediagnosisoffoetalbrainabnormalitiesinutero AT cohenjudith asystematicreviewandmetaanalysistodeterminethecontributionofmrimagingtothediagnosisoffoetalbrainabnormalitiesinutero AT papaioannoudiana asystematicreviewandmetaanalysistodeterminethecontributionofmrimagingtothediagnosisoffoetalbrainabnormalitiesinutero AT bradburnmike asystematicreviewandmetaanalysistodeterminethecontributionofmrimagingtothediagnosisoffoetalbrainabnormalitiesinutero AT suttonanthea asystematicreviewandmetaanalysistodeterminethecontributionofmrimagingtothediagnosisoffoetalbrainabnormalitiesinutero AT griffithspauld asystematicreviewandmetaanalysistodeterminethecontributionofmrimagingtothediagnosisoffoetalbrainabnormalitiesinutero AT jarvisdebbie systematicreviewandmetaanalysistodeterminethecontributionofmrimagingtothediagnosisoffoetalbrainabnormalitiesinutero AT mooneycara systematicreviewandmetaanalysistodeterminethecontributionofmrimagingtothediagnosisoffoetalbrainabnormalitiesinutero AT cohenjudith systematicreviewandmetaanalysistodeterminethecontributionofmrimagingtothediagnosisoffoetalbrainabnormalitiesinutero AT papaioannoudiana systematicreviewandmetaanalysistodeterminethecontributionofmrimagingtothediagnosisoffoetalbrainabnormalitiesinutero AT bradburnmike systematicreviewandmetaanalysistodeterminethecontributionofmrimagingtothediagnosisoffoetalbrainabnormalitiesinutero AT suttonanthea systematicreviewandmetaanalysistodeterminethecontributionofmrimagingtothediagnosisoffoetalbrainabnormalitiesinutero AT griffithspauld systematicreviewandmetaanalysistodeterminethecontributionofmrimagingtothediagnosisoffoetalbrainabnormalitiesinutero |