Cargando…

Corticospinal excitability to the biceps brachii and its relationship to postactivation potentiation of the elbow flexors

We examined the effects of a submaximal voluntary elbow flexor contraction protocol on measures of corticospinal excitability and postactivation potentiation of evoked muscle forces and if these measures were state‐dependent (rest vs. voluntary muscle contraction). Participants completed four experi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Collins, Brandon W., Gale, Laura H., Buckle, Natasha C. M., Button, Duane C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5408290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28455452
http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.13265
_version_ 1783232280484904960
author Collins, Brandon W.
Gale, Laura H.
Buckle, Natasha C. M.
Button, Duane C.
author_facet Collins, Brandon W.
Gale, Laura H.
Buckle, Natasha C. M.
Button, Duane C.
author_sort Collins, Brandon W.
collection PubMed
description We examined the effects of a submaximal voluntary elbow flexor contraction protocol on measures of corticospinal excitability and postactivation potentiation of evoked muscle forces and if these measures were state‐dependent (rest vs. voluntary muscle contraction). Participants completed four experimental sessions where they rested or performed a 5% maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) of the elbow flexors prior to, immediately, and 5 min following a submaximal contraction protocol. During rest or 5% MVC, transcranial magnetic stimulation, transmastoid electrical stimulation, electrical stimulation of biceps brachii motor point and Erb's point were elicited to induce motor‐evoked potentials (MEPs), cervicomedullary MEPs (CMEPs), potentiated twitch (PT) force, and maximal muscle compound action potential (M (max)), respectively prior to, immediately, and 5 min postcontraction protocol. MEP amplitudes increased (215 and 165%M(max), P ≤ 0.03) only at 1 and 6s postcontraction protocol, respectively during rest but not 5% MVC. CMEP amplitudes decreased during rest and 5% MVC (range:21–58%M (max), P ≤ 0.04) for up to 81 sec postcontraction protocol. Peak twitch force increased immediately postcontraction protocol and remained elevated for 90 sec (range:122–147% increase, P < 0.05). There was a significant positive correlation between MEP and PT force during rest (r = 0.88, P = 0.01) and a negative correlation between CMEP and PT force during rest (r = −0.85, P < 0.02 and 5% MVC (r = −0.96, P < 0.01) immediately postcontraction protocol. In conclusion, the change in corticospinal and spinal excitability was state‐ and time‐dependent whereas spinal excitability and postactivation potentiation were time‐dependent following the contraction protocol. Changes in corticospinal excitability and postactivation potentiation correlated and were also state‐dependent.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5408290
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54082902017-05-02 Corticospinal excitability to the biceps brachii and its relationship to postactivation potentiation of the elbow flexors Collins, Brandon W. Gale, Laura H. Buckle, Natasha C. M. Button, Duane C. Physiol Rep Original Research We examined the effects of a submaximal voluntary elbow flexor contraction protocol on measures of corticospinal excitability and postactivation potentiation of evoked muscle forces and if these measures were state‐dependent (rest vs. voluntary muscle contraction). Participants completed four experimental sessions where they rested or performed a 5% maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) of the elbow flexors prior to, immediately, and 5 min following a submaximal contraction protocol. During rest or 5% MVC, transcranial magnetic stimulation, transmastoid electrical stimulation, electrical stimulation of biceps brachii motor point and Erb's point were elicited to induce motor‐evoked potentials (MEPs), cervicomedullary MEPs (CMEPs), potentiated twitch (PT) force, and maximal muscle compound action potential (M (max)), respectively prior to, immediately, and 5 min postcontraction protocol. MEP amplitudes increased (215 and 165%M(max), P ≤ 0.03) only at 1 and 6s postcontraction protocol, respectively during rest but not 5% MVC. CMEP amplitudes decreased during rest and 5% MVC (range:21–58%M (max), P ≤ 0.04) for up to 81 sec postcontraction protocol. Peak twitch force increased immediately postcontraction protocol and remained elevated for 90 sec (range:122–147% increase, P < 0.05). There was a significant positive correlation between MEP and PT force during rest (r = 0.88, P = 0.01) and a negative correlation between CMEP and PT force during rest (r = −0.85, P < 0.02 and 5% MVC (r = −0.96, P < 0.01) immediately postcontraction protocol. In conclusion, the change in corticospinal and spinal excitability was state‐ and time‐dependent whereas spinal excitability and postactivation potentiation were time‐dependent following the contraction protocol. Changes in corticospinal excitability and postactivation potentiation correlated and were also state‐dependent. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5408290/ /pubmed/28455452 http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.13265 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Physiological Reports published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of The Physiological Society and the American Physiological Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Collins, Brandon W.
Gale, Laura H.
Buckle, Natasha C. M.
Button, Duane C.
Corticospinal excitability to the biceps brachii and its relationship to postactivation potentiation of the elbow flexors
title Corticospinal excitability to the biceps brachii and its relationship to postactivation potentiation of the elbow flexors
title_full Corticospinal excitability to the biceps brachii and its relationship to postactivation potentiation of the elbow flexors
title_fullStr Corticospinal excitability to the biceps brachii and its relationship to postactivation potentiation of the elbow flexors
title_full_unstemmed Corticospinal excitability to the biceps brachii and its relationship to postactivation potentiation of the elbow flexors
title_short Corticospinal excitability to the biceps brachii and its relationship to postactivation potentiation of the elbow flexors
title_sort corticospinal excitability to the biceps brachii and its relationship to postactivation potentiation of the elbow flexors
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5408290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28455452
http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.13265
work_keys_str_mv AT collinsbrandonw corticospinalexcitabilitytothebicepsbrachiianditsrelationshiptopostactivationpotentiationoftheelbowflexors
AT galelaurah corticospinalexcitabilitytothebicepsbrachiianditsrelationshiptopostactivationpotentiationoftheelbowflexors
AT bucklenatashacm corticospinalexcitabilitytothebicepsbrachiianditsrelationshiptopostactivationpotentiationoftheelbowflexors
AT buttonduanec corticospinalexcitabilitytothebicepsbrachiianditsrelationshiptopostactivationpotentiationoftheelbowflexors