Cargando…

Cleavage modification did not alter blastomere fates during bryozoan evolution

BACKGROUND: Stereotypic cleavage patterns play a crucial role in cell fate determination by precisely positioning early embryonic blastomeres. Although misplaced cell divisions can alter blastomere fates and cause embryonic defects, cleavage patterns have been modified several times during animal ev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vellutini, Bruno C., Martín-Durán, José M., Hejnol, Andreas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5408385/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28454545
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12915-017-0371-9
_version_ 1783232294705692672
author Vellutini, Bruno C.
Martín-Durán, José M.
Hejnol, Andreas
author_facet Vellutini, Bruno C.
Martín-Durán, José M.
Hejnol, Andreas
author_sort Vellutini, Bruno C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Stereotypic cleavage patterns play a crucial role in cell fate determination by precisely positioning early embryonic blastomeres. Although misplaced cell divisions can alter blastomere fates and cause embryonic defects, cleavage patterns have been modified several times during animal evolution. However, it remains unclear how evolutionary changes in cleavage impact the specification of blastomere fates. Here, we analyze the transition from spiral cleavage – a stereotypic pattern remarkably conserved in many protostomes – to a biradial cleavage pattern, which occurred during the evolution of bryozoans. RESULTS: Using 3D-live imaging time-lapse microscopy (4D-microscopy), we characterize the cell lineage, MAPK signaling, and the expression of 16 developmental genes in the bryozoan Membranipora membranacea. We found that the molecular identity and the fates of early bryozoan blastomeres are similar to the putative homologous blastomeres in spiral-cleaving embryos. CONCLUSIONS: Our work suggests that bryozoans have retained traits of spiral development, such as the early embryonic fate map, despite the evolution of a novel cleavage geometry. These findings provide additional support that stereotypic cleavage patterns can be modified during evolution without major changes to the molecular identity and fate of embryonic blastomeres. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12915-017-0371-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5408385
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54083852017-05-02 Cleavage modification did not alter blastomere fates during bryozoan evolution Vellutini, Bruno C. Martín-Durán, José M. Hejnol, Andreas BMC Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: Stereotypic cleavage patterns play a crucial role in cell fate determination by precisely positioning early embryonic blastomeres. Although misplaced cell divisions can alter blastomere fates and cause embryonic defects, cleavage patterns have been modified several times during animal evolution. However, it remains unclear how evolutionary changes in cleavage impact the specification of blastomere fates. Here, we analyze the transition from spiral cleavage – a stereotypic pattern remarkably conserved in many protostomes – to a biradial cleavage pattern, which occurred during the evolution of bryozoans. RESULTS: Using 3D-live imaging time-lapse microscopy (4D-microscopy), we characterize the cell lineage, MAPK signaling, and the expression of 16 developmental genes in the bryozoan Membranipora membranacea. We found that the molecular identity and the fates of early bryozoan blastomeres are similar to the putative homologous blastomeres in spiral-cleaving embryos. CONCLUSIONS: Our work suggests that bryozoans have retained traits of spiral development, such as the early embryonic fate map, despite the evolution of a novel cleavage geometry. These findings provide additional support that stereotypic cleavage patterns can be modified during evolution without major changes to the molecular identity and fate of embryonic blastomeres. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12915-017-0371-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5408385/ /pubmed/28454545 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12915-017-0371-9 Text en © Hejnol et al. 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Vellutini, Bruno C.
Martín-Durán, José M.
Hejnol, Andreas
Cleavage modification did not alter blastomere fates during bryozoan evolution
title Cleavage modification did not alter blastomere fates during bryozoan evolution
title_full Cleavage modification did not alter blastomere fates during bryozoan evolution
title_fullStr Cleavage modification did not alter blastomere fates during bryozoan evolution
title_full_unstemmed Cleavage modification did not alter blastomere fates during bryozoan evolution
title_short Cleavage modification did not alter blastomere fates during bryozoan evolution
title_sort cleavage modification did not alter blastomere fates during bryozoan evolution
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5408385/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28454545
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12915-017-0371-9
work_keys_str_mv AT vellutinibrunoc cleavagemodificationdidnotalterblastomerefatesduringbryozoanevolution
AT martinduranjosem cleavagemodificationdidnotalterblastomerefatesduringbryozoanevolution
AT hejnolandreas cleavagemodificationdidnotalterblastomerefatesduringbryozoanevolution