Cargando…
Cleavage modification did not alter blastomere fates during bryozoan evolution
BACKGROUND: Stereotypic cleavage patterns play a crucial role in cell fate determination by precisely positioning early embryonic blastomeres. Although misplaced cell divisions can alter blastomere fates and cause embryonic defects, cleavage patterns have been modified several times during animal ev...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5408385/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28454545 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12915-017-0371-9 |
_version_ | 1783232294705692672 |
---|---|
author | Vellutini, Bruno C. Martín-Durán, José M. Hejnol, Andreas |
author_facet | Vellutini, Bruno C. Martín-Durán, José M. Hejnol, Andreas |
author_sort | Vellutini, Bruno C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Stereotypic cleavage patterns play a crucial role in cell fate determination by precisely positioning early embryonic blastomeres. Although misplaced cell divisions can alter blastomere fates and cause embryonic defects, cleavage patterns have been modified several times during animal evolution. However, it remains unclear how evolutionary changes in cleavage impact the specification of blastomere fates. Here, we analyze the transition from spiral cleavage – a stereotypic pattern remarkably conserved in many protostomes – to a biradial cleavage pattern, which occurred during the evolution of bryozoans. RESULTS: Using 3D-live imaging time-lapse microscopy (4D-microscopy), we characterize the cell lineage, MAPK signaling, and the expression of 16 developmental genes in the bryozoan Membranipora membranacea. We found that the molecular identity and the fates of early bryozoan blastomeres are similar to the putative homologous blastomeres in spiral-cleaving embryos. CONCLUSIONS: Our work suggests that bryozoans have retained traits of spiral development, such as the early embryonic fate map, despite the evolution of a novel cleavage geometry. These findings provide additional support that stereotypic cleavage patterns can be modified during evolution without major changes to the molecular identity and fate of embryonic blastomeres. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12915-017-0371-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5408385 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54083852017-05-02 Cleavage modification did not alter blastomere fates during bryozoan evolution Vellutini, Bruno C. Martín-Durán, José M. Hejnol, Andreas BMC Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: Stereotypic cleavage patterns play a crucial role in cell fate determination by precisely positioning early embryonic blastomeres. Although misplaced cell divisions can alter blastomere fates and cause embryonic defects, cleavage patterns have been modified several times during animal evolution. However, it remains unclear how evolutionary changes in cleavage impact the specification of blastomere fates. Here, we analyze the transition from spiral cleavage – a stereotypic pattern remarkably conserved in many protostomes – to a biradial cleavage pattern, which occurred during the evolution of bryozoans. RESULTS: Using 3D-live imaging time-lapse microscopy (4D-microscopy), we characterize the cell lineage, MAPK signaling, and the expression of 16 developmental genes in the bryozoan Membranipora membranacea. We found that the molecular identity and the fates of early bryozoan blastomeres are similar to the putative homologous blastomeres in spiral-cleaving embryos. CONCLUSIONS: Our work suggests that bryozoans have retained traits of spiral development, such as the early embryonic fate map, despite the evolution of a novel cleavage geometry. These findings provide additional support that stereotypic cleavage patterns can be modified during evolution without major changes to the molecular identity and fate of embryonic blastomeres. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12915-017-0371-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5408385/ /pubmed/28454545 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12915-017-0371-9 Text en © Hejnol et al. 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Vellutini, Bruno C. Martín-Durán, José M. Hejnol, Andreas Cleavage modification did not alter blastomere fates during bryozoan evolution |
title | Cleavage modification did not alter blastomere fates during bryozoan evolution |
title_full | Cleavage modification did not alter blastomere fates during bryozoan evolution |
title_fullStr | Cleavage modification did not alter blastomere fates during bryozoan evolution |
title_full_unstemmed | Cleavage modification did not alter blastomere fates during bryozoan evolution |
title_short | Cleavage modification did not alter blastomere fates during bryozoan evolution |
title_sort | cleavage modification did not alter blastomere fates during bryozoan evolution |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5408385/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28454545 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12915-017-0371-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vellutinibrunoc cleavagemodificationdidnotalterblastomerefatesduringbryozoanevolution AT martinduranjosem cleavagemodificationdidnotalterblastomerefatesduringbryozoanevolution AT hejnolandreas cleavagemodificationdidnotalterblastomerefatesduringbryozoanevolution |