Cargando…
Development and evaluation of training resources to prepare health professionals for counselling pregnant women about non-invasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome: a mixed methods study
BACKGROUND: The availability of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for aneuploidies is expanding rapidly throughout the world. Training health professionals to offer NIPT in a way that supports informed choice is essential for implementation. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a tra...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5408404/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28449648 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1315-7 |
_version_ | 1783232299021631488 |
---|---|
author | Oxenford, Kerry Daley, Rebecca Lewis, Celine Hill, Melissa Chitty, Lyn S. |
author_facet | Oxenford, Kerry Daley, Rebecca Lewis, Celine Hill, Melissa Chitty, Lyn S. |
author_sort | Oxenford, Kerry |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The availability of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for aneuploidies is expanding rapidly throughout the world. Training health professionals to offer NIPT in a way that supports informed choice is essential for implementation. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a training package for health professionals to support the introduction of NIPT into clinical practice. METHODS: Training on NIPT was offered to health professionals, primarily midwives, involved in Down syndrome screening and testing in eight hospitals located in England and Scotland as part of a research study evaluating the implementation of NIPT in the UK National Health Service. Training was evaluated using a mixed methods approach that included quantitative questionnaires at three time points and post-training qualitative interviews. The questionnaires measured confidence, self-perceived knowledge and actual knowledge about NIPT for Down syndrome. Interviews explored opinions about the training and experiences of offering NIPT. RESULTS: The training provided to the health professionals was found to positively impact on their confidence in discussing NIPT with women in their clinic, and both their perceived and actual knowledge and understanding of NIPT was improved. Knowledge remained weak in four areas; cell-free fetal DNA levels increase with gestation; turnaround time for NIPT results; cell-free fetal DNA is placental in origin; and NIPT false positive rate. CONCLUSIONS: Training materials, including a lesson plan, PowerPoint presentation and written factsheet on NIPT, have been developed and evaluated for use in educating midwives and supporting the introduction of NIPT. Implementation of training should include a greater focus on the areas where knowledge remained low. Some groups of midwives will need additional training or support to optimise their confidence in discussing NIPT with women. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12884-017-1315-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5408404 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54084042017-05-02 Development and evaluation of training resources to prepare health professionals for counselling pregnant women about non-invasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome: a mixed methods study Oxenford, Kerry Daley, Rebecca Lewis, Celine Hill, Melissa Chitty, Lyn S. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: The availability of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for aneuploidies is expanding rapidly throughout the world. Training health professionals to offer NIPT in a way that supports informed choice is essential for implementation. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a training package for health professionals to support the introduction of NIPT into clinical practice. METHODS: Training on NIPT was offered to health professionals, primarily midwives, involved in Down syndrome screening and testing in eight hospitals located in England and Scotland as part of a research study evaluating the implementation of NIPT in the UK National Health Service. Training was evaluated using a mixed methods approach that included quantitative questionnaires at three time points and post-training qualitative interviews. The questionnaires measured confidence, self-perceived knowledge and actual knowledge about NIPT for Down syndrome. Interviews explored opinions about the training and experiences of offering NIPT. RESULTS: The training provided to the health professionals was found to positively impact on their confidence in discussing NIPT with women in their clinic, and both their perceived and actual knowledge and understanding of NIPT was improved. Knowledge remained weak in four areas; cell-free fetal DNA levels increase with gestation; turnaround time for NIPT results; cell-free fetal DNA is placental in origin; and NIPT false positive rate. CONCLUSIONS: Training materials, including a lesson plan, PowerPoint presentation and written factsheet on NIPT, have been developed and evaluated for use in educating midwives and supporting the introduction of NIPT. Implementation of training should include a greater focus on the areas where knowledge remained low. Some groups of midwives will need additional training or support to optimise their confidence in discussing NIPT with women. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12884-017-1315-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5408404/ /pubmed/28449648 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1315-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Oxenford, Kerry Daley, Rebecca Lewis, Celine Hill, Melissa Chitty, Lyn S. Development and evaluation of training resources to prepare health professionals for counselling pregnant women about non-invasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome: a mixed methods study |
title | Development and evaluation of training resources to prepare health professionals for counselling pregnant women about non-invasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome: a mixed methods study |
title_full | Development and evaluation of training resources to prepare health professionals for counselling pregnant women about non-invasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome: a mixed methods study |
title_fullStr | Development and evaluation of training resources to prepare health professionals for counselling pregnant women about non-invasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome: a mixed methods study |
title_full_unstemmed | Development and evaluation of training resources to prepare health professionals for counselling pregnant women about non-invasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome: a mixed methods study |
title_short | Development and evaluation of training resources to prepare health professionals for counselling pregnant women about non-invasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome: a mixed methods study |
title_sort | development and evaluation of training resources to prepare health professionals for counselling pregnant women about non-invasive prenatal testing for down syndrome: a mixed methods study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5408404/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28449648 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1315-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oxenfordkerry developmentandevaluationoftrainingresourcestopreparehealthprofessionalsforcounsellingpregnantwomenaboutnoninvasiveprenataltestingfordownsyndromeamixedmethodsstudy AT daleyrebecca developmentandevaluationoftrainingresourcestopreparehealthprofessionalsforcounsellingpregnantwomenaboutnoninvasiveprenataltestingfordownsyndromeamixedmethodsstudy AT lewisceline developmentandevaluationoftrainingresourcestopreparehealthprofessionalsforcounsellingpregnantwomenaboutnoninvasiveprenataltestingfordownsyndromeamixedmethodsstudy AT hillmelissa developmentandevaluationoftrainingresourcestopreparehealthprofessionalsforcounsellingpregnantwomenaboutnoninvasiveprenataltestingfordownsyndromeamixedmethodsstudy AT chittylyns developmentandevaluationoftrainingresourcestopreparehealthprofessionalsforcounsellingpregnantwomenaboutnoninvasiveprenataltestingfordownsyndromeamixedmethodsstudy |