Cargando…

Development and evaluation of training resources to prepare health professionals for counselling pregnant women about non-invasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome: a mixed methods study

BACKGROUND: The availability of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for aneuploidies is expanding rapidly throughout the world. Training health professionals to offer NIPT in a way that supports informed choice is essential for implementation. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a tra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oxenford, Kerry, Daley, Rebecca, Lewis, Celine, Hill, Melissa, Chitty, Lyn S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5408404/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28449648
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1315-7
_version_ 1783232299021631488
author Oxenford, Kerry
Daley, Rebecca
Lewis, Celine
Hill, Melissa
Chitty, Lyn S.
author_facet Oxenford, Kerry
Daley, Rebecca
Lewis, Celine
Hill, Melissa
Chitty, Lyn S.
author_sort Oxenford, Kerry
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The availability of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for aneuploidies is expanding rapidly throughout the world. Training health professionals to offer NIPT in a way that supports informed choice is essential for implementation. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a training package for health professionals to support the introduction of NIPT into clinical practice. METHODS: Training on NIPT was offered to health professionals, primarily midwives, involved in Down syndrome screening and testing in eight hospitals located in England and Scotland as part of a research study evaluating the implementation of NIPT in the UK National Health Service. Training was evaluated using a mixed methods approach that included quantitative questionnaires at three time points and post-training qualitative interviews. The questionnaires measured confidence, self-perceived knowledge and actual knowledge about NIPT for Down syndrome. Interviews explored opinions about the training and experiences of offering NIPT. RESULTS: The training provided to the health professionals was found to positively impact on their confidence in discussing NIPT with women in their clinic, and both their perceived and actual knowledge and understanding of NIPT was improved. Knowledge remained weak in four areas; cell-free fetal DNA levels increase with gestation; turnaround time for NIPT results; cell-free fetal DNA is placental in origin; and NIPT false positive rate. CONCLUSIONS: Training materials, including a lesson plan, PowerPoint presentation and written factsheet on NIPT, have been developed and evaluated for use in educating midwives and supporting the introduction of NIPT. Implementation of training should include a greater focus on the areas where knowledge remained low. Some groups of midwives will need additional training or support to optimise their confidence in discussing NIPT with women. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12884-017-1315-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5408404
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54084042017-05-02 Development and evaluation of training resources to prepare health professionals for counselling pregnant women about non-invasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome: a mixed methods study Oxenford, Kerry Daley, Rebecca Lewis, Celine Hill, Melissa Chitty, Lyn S. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: The availability of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for aneuploidies is expanding rapidly throughout the world. Training health professionals to offer NIPT in a way that supports informed choice is essential for implementation. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a training package for health professionals to support the introduction of NIPT into clinical practice. METHODS: Training on NIPT was offered to health professionals, primarily midwives, involved in Down syndrome screening and testing in eight hospitals located in England and Scotland as part of a research study evaluating the implementation of NIPT in the UK National Health Service. Training was evaluated using a mixed methods approach that included quantitative questionnaires at three time points and post-training qualitative interviews. The questionnaires measured confidence, self-perceived knowledge and actual knowledge about NIPT for Down syndrome. Interviews explored opinions about the training and experiences of offering NIPT. RESULTS: The training provided to the health professionals was found to positively impact on their confidence in discussing NIPT with women in their clinic, and both their perceived and actual knowledge and understanding of NIPT was improved. Knowledge remained weak in four areas; cell-free fetal DNA levels increase with gestation; turnaround time for NIPT results; cell-free fetal DNA is placental in origin; and NIPT false positive rate. CONCLUSIONS: Training materials, including a lesson plan, PowerPoint presentation and written factsheet on NIPT, have been developed and evaluated for use in educating midwives and supporting the introduction of NIPT. Implementation of training should include a greater focus on the areas where knowledge remained low. Some groups of midwives will need additional training or support to optimise their confidence in discussing NIPT with women. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12884-017-1315-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5408404/ /pubmed/28449648 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1315-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Oxenford, Kerry
Daley, Rebecca
Lewis, Celine
Hill, Melissa
Chitty, Lyn S.
Development and evaluation of training resources to prepare health professionals for counselling pregnant women about non-invasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome: a mixed methods study
title Development and evaluation of training resources to prepare health professionals for counselling pregnant women about non-invasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome: a mixed methods study
title_full Development and evaluation of training resources to prepare health professionals for counselling pregnant women about non-invasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome: a mixed methods study
title_fullStr Development and evaluation of training resources to prepare health professionals for counselling pregnant women about non-invasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome: a mixed methods study
title_full_unstemmed Development and evaluation of training resources to prepare health professionals for counselling pregnant women about non-invasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome: a mixed methods study
title_short Development and evaluation of training resources to prepare health professionals for counselling pregnant women about non-invasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome: a mixed methods study
title_sort development and evaluation of training resources to prepare health professionals for counselling pregnant women about non-invasive prenatal testing for down syndrome: a mixed methods study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5408404/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28449648
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1315-7
work_keys_str_mv AT oxenfordkerry developmentandevaluationoftrainingresourcestopreparehealthprofessionalsforcounsellingpregnantwomenaboutnoninvasiveprenataltestingfordownsyndromeamixedmethodsstudy
AT daleyrebecca developmentandevaluationoftrainingresourcestopreparehealthprofessionalsforcounsellingpregnantwomenaboutnoninvasiveprenataltestingfordownsyndromeamixedmethodsstudy
AT lewisceline developmentandevaluationoftrainingresourcestopreparehealthprofessionalsforcounsellingpregnantwomenaboutnoninvasiveprenataltestingfordownsyndromeamixedmethodsstudy
AT hillmelissa developmentandevaluationoftrainingresourcestopreparehealthprofessionalsforcounsellingpregnantwomenaboutnoninvasiveprenataltestingfordownsyndromeamixedmethodsstudy
AT chittylyns developmentandevaluationoftrainingresourcestopreparehealthprofessionalsforcounsellingpregnantwomenaboutnoninvasiveprenataltestingfordownsyndromeamixedmethodsstudy