Cargando…

Optimizing ChIP-seq peak detectors using visual labels and supervised machine learning

MOTIVATION: Many peak detection algorithms have been proposed for ChIP-seq data analysis, but it is not obvious which algorithm and what parameters are optimal for any given dataset. In contrast, regions with and without obvious peaks can be easily labeled by visual inspection of aligned read counts...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hocking, Toby Dylan, Goerner-Potvin, Patricia, Morin, Andreanne, Shao, Xiaojian, Pastinen, Tomi, Bourque, Guillaume
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5408812/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27797775
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btw672
_version_ 1783232370449580032
author Hocking, Toby Dylan
Goerner-Potvin, Patricia
Morin, Andreanne
Shao, Xiaojian
Pastinen, Tomi
Bourque, Guillaume
author_facet Hocking, Toby Dylan
Goerner-Potvin, Patricia
Morin, Andreanne
Shao, Xiaojian
Pastinen, Tomi
Bourque, Guillaume
author_sort Hocking, Toby Dylan
collection PubMed
description MOTIVATION: Many peak detection algorithms have been proposed for ChIP-seq data analysis, but it is not obvious which algorithm and what parameters are optimal for any given dataset. In contrast, regions with and without obvious peaks can be easily labeled by visual inspection of aligned read counts in a genome browser. We propose a supervised machine learning approach for ChIP-seq data analysis, using labels that encode qualitative judgments about which genomic regions contain or do not contain peaks. The main idea is to manually label a small subset of the genome, and then learn a model that makes consistent peak predictions on the rest of the genome. RESULTS: We created 7 new histone mark datasets with 12 826 visually determined labels, and analyzed 3 existing transcription factor datasets. We observed that default peak detection parameters yield high false positive rates, which can be reduced by learning parameters using a relatively small training set of labeled data from the same experiment type. We also observed that labels from different people are highly consistent. Overall, these data indicate that our supervised labeling method is useful for quantitatively training and testing peak detection algorithms. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Labeled histone mark data http://cbio.ensmp.fr/~thocking/chip-seq-chunk-db/, R package to compute the label error of predicted peaks https://github.com/tdhock/PeakError SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5408812
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54088122017-05-03 Optimizing ChIP-seq peak detectors using visual labels and supervised machine learning Hocking, Toby Dylan Goerner-Potvin, Patricia Morin, Andreanne Shao, Xiaojian Pastinen, Tomi Bourque, Guillaume Bioinformatics Original Papers MOTIVATION: Many peak detection algorithms have been proposed for ChIP-seq data analysis, but it is not obvious which algorithm and what parameters are optimal for any given dataset. In contrast, regions with and without obvious peaks can be easily labeled by visual inspection of aligned read counts in a genome browser. We propose a supervised machine learning approach for ChIP-seq data analysis, using labels that encode qualitative judgments about which genomic regions contain or do not contain peaks. The main idea is to manually label a small subset of the genome, and then learn a model that makes consistent peak predictions on the rest of the genome. RESULTS: We created 7 new histone mark datasets with 12 826 visually determined labels, and analyzed 3 existing transcription factor datasets. We observed that default peak detection parameters yield high false positive rates, which can be reduced by learning parameters using a relatively small training set of labeled data from the same experiment type. We also observed that labels from different people are highly consistent. Overall, these data indicate that our supervised labeling method is useful for quantitatively training and testing peak detection algorithms. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Labeled histone mark data http://cbio.ensmp.fr/~thocking/chip-seq-chunk-db/, R package to compute the label error of predicted peaks https://github.com/tdhock/PeakError SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Oxford University Press 2017-02-15 2016-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5408812/ /pubmed/27797775 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btw672 Text en © The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Papers
Hocking, Toby Dylan
Goerner-Potvin, Patricia
Morin, Andreanne
Shao, Xiaojian
Pastinen, Tomi
Bourque, Guillaume
Optimizing ChIP-seq peak detectors using visual labels and supervised machine learning
title Optimizing ChIP-seq peak detectors using visual labels and supervised machine learning
title_full Optimizing ChIP-seq peak detectors using visual labels and supervised machine learning
title_fullStr Optimizing ChIP-seq peak detectors using visual labels and supervised machine learning
title_full_unstemmed Optimizing ChIP-seq peak detectors using visual labels and supervised machine learning
title_short Optimizing ChIP-seq peak detectors using visual labels and supervised machine learning
title_sort optimizing chip-seq peak detectors using visual labels and supervised machine learning
topic Original Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5408812/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27797775
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btw672
work_keys_str_mv AT hockingtobydylan optimizingchipseqpeakdetectorsusingvisuallabelsandsupervisedmachinelearning
AT goernerpotvinpatricia optimizingchipseqpeakdetectorsusingvisuallabelsandsupervisedmachinelearning
AT morinandreanne optimizingchipseqpeakdetectorsusingvisuallabelsandsupervisedmachinelearning
AT shaoxiaojian optimizingchipseqpeakdetectorsusingvisuallabelsandsupervisedmachinelearning
AT pastinentomi optimizingchipseqpeakdetectorsusingvisuallabelsandsupervisedmachinelearning
AT bourqueguillaume optimizingchipseqpeakdetectorsusingvisuallabelsandsupervisedmachinelearning