Cargando…
Feasibility of common bibliometrics in evaluating translational science
INTRODUCTION: A pilot study by 6 Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSAs) explored how bibliometrics can be used to assess research influence. METHODS: Evaluators from 6 institutions shared data on publications (4202 total) they supported, and conducted a combined analysis with state-of-the...
Autores principales: | Schneider, M., Kane, C. M., Rainwater, J., Guerrero, L., Tong, G., Desai, S. R., Trochim, W. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5408837/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28480055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2016.8 |
Ejemplares similares
-
RRApp, a robust randomization app, for clinical and translational research
por: Tu, Chengcheng, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Blood substitutes: Basic science, translational studies and clinical trials
por: Jahr, Jonathan S.
Publicado: (2022) -
Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence–generated Responses to Common Plastic Surgery Questions
por: Copeland-Halperin, Libby R., et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Lentiviral transduction of rat Sertoli cells as a means to modify gene expression
por: Nicholls, Peter K., et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Opportunities for strengthening CTSA evaluation
por: Patel, Tanha, et al.
Publicado: (2019)