Cargando…

Mapping the evolving definitions of translational research

OBJECTIVE: Systematic review and analysis of definitions of translational research. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The final corpus was comprised of 33 papers, each read by at least 2 reviewers. Definitions were mapped to a common set of research processes for presentation and analysis. Influence of papers...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fort, Daniel G., Herr, Timothy M., Shaw, Pamela L., Gutzman, Karen E., Starren, Justin B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5408839/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28480056
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2016.10
_version_ 1783232376175853568
author Fort, Daniel G.
Herr, Timothy M.
Shaw, Pamela L.
Gutzman, Karen E.
Starren, Justin B.
author_facet Fort, Daniel G.
Herr, Timothy M.
Shaw, Pamela L.
Gutzman, Karen E.
Starren, Justin B.
author_sort Fort, Daniel G.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Systematic review and analysis of definitions of translational research. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The final corpus was comprised of 33 papers, each read by at least 2 reviewers. Definitions were mapped to a common set of research processes for presentation and analysis. Influence of papers and definitions was further evaluated using citation analysis and agglomerative clustering. RESULTS: All definitions were mapped to common research processes, revealing most common labels for each process. Agglomerative clustering revealed 3 broad families of definitions. Citation analysis showed that the originating paper of each family has been cited ~10 times more than any other member. DISCUSSION: Although there is little agreement between definitions, we were able to identify an emerging consensus 5-phase (T0–T4) definition for translational research. T1 involves processes that bring ideas from basic research through early testing in humans. T2 involves the establishment of effectiveness in humans and clinical guidelines. T3 primarily focuses on implementation and dissemination research while T4 focuses on outcomes and effectiveness in populations. T0 involves research such as genome-wide association studies which wrap back around to basic research. CONCLUSION: We used systematic review and analysis to identify emerging consensus between definitions of translational research phases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5408839
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54088392017-05-04 Mapping the evolving definitions of translational research Fort, Daniel G. Herr, Timothy M. Shaw, Pamela L. Gutzman, Karen E. Starren, Justin B. J Clin Transl Sci Education OBJECTIVE: Systematic review and analysis of definitions of translational research. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The final corpus was comprised of 33 papers, each read by at least 2 reviewers. Definitions were mapped to a common set of research processes for presentation and analysis. Influence of papers and definitions was further evaluated using citation analysis and agglomerative clustering. RESULTS: All definitions were mapped to common research processes, revealing most common labels for each process. Agglomerative clustering revealed 3 broad families of definitions. Citation analysis showed that the originating paper of each family has been cited ~10 times more than any other member. DISCUSSION: Although there is little agreement between definitions, we were able to identify an emerging consensus 5-phase (T0–T4) definition for translational research. T1 involves processes that bring ideas from basic research through early testing in humans. T2 involves the establishment of effectiveness in humans and clinical guidelines. T3 primarily focuses on implementation and dissemination research while T4 focuses on outcomes and effectiveness in populations. T0 involves research such as genome-wide association studies which wrap back around to basic research. CONCLUSION: We used systematic review and analysis to identify emerging consensus between definitions of translational research phases. Cambridge University Press 2017-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5408839/ /pubmed/28480056 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2016.10 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the same Creative Commons licence is included and the original work is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use.
spellingShingle Education
Fort, Daniel G.
Herr, Timothy M.
Shaw, Pamela L.
Gutzman, Karen E.
Starren, Justin B.
Mapping the evolving definitions of translational research
title Mapping the evolving definitions of translational research
title_full Mapping the evolving definitions of translational research
title_fullStr Mapping the evolving definitions of translational research
title_full_unstemmed Mapping the evolving definitions of translational research
title_short Mapping the evolving definitions of translational research
title_sort mapping the evolving definitions of translational research
topic Education
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5408839/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28480056
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2016.10
work_keys_str_mv AT fortdanielg mappingtheevolvingdefinitionsoftranslationalresearch
AT herrtimothym mappingtheevolvingdefinitionsoftranslationalresearch
AT shawpamelal mappingtheevolvingdefinitionsoftranslationalresearch
AT gutzmankarene mappingtheevolvingdefinitionsoftranslationalresearch
AT starrenjustinb mappingtheevolvingdefinitionsoftranslationalresearch