Cargando…

Likelihood analysis of the minimal AMSB model

We perform a likelihood analysis of the minimal anomaly-mediated supersymmetry-breaking (mAMSB) model using constraints from cosmology and accelerator experiments. We find that either a wino-like or a Higgsino-like neutralino LSP, [Formula: see text] , may provide the cold dark matter (DM), both wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bagnaschi, E., Borsato, M., Sakurai, K., Buchmueller, O., Cavanaugh, R., Chobanova, V., Citron, M., Costa, J. C., De Roeck, A., Dolan, M. J., Ellis, J. R., Flächer, H., Heinemeyer, S., Isidori, G., Lucio, M., Luo, F., Santos, D. Martínez, Olive, K. A., Richards, A., Weiglein, G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5409153/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28515671
http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-4810-0
_version_ 1783232428236603392
author Bagnaschi, E.
Borsato, M.
Sakurai, K.
Buchmueller, O.
Cavanaugh, R.
Chobanova, V.
Citron, M.
Costa, J. C.
De Roeck, A.
Dolan, M. J.
Ellis, J. R.
Flächer, H.
Heinemeyer, S.
Isidori, G.
Lucio, M.
Luo, F.
Santos, D. Martínez
Olive, K. A.
Richards, A.
Weiglein, G.
author_facet Bagnaschi, E.
Borsato, M.
Sakurai, K.
Buchmueller, O.
Cavanaugh, R.
Chobanova, V.
Citron, M.
Costa, J. C.
De Roeck, A.
Dolan, M. J.
Ellis, J. R.
Flächer, H.
Heinemeyer, S.
Isidori, G.
Lucio, M.
Luo, F.
Santos, D. Martínez
Olive, K. A.
Richards, A.
Weiglein, G.
author_sort Bagnaschi, E.
collection PubMed
description We perform a likelihood analysis of the minimal anomaly-mediated supersymmetry-breaking (mAMSB) model using constraints from cosmology and accelerator experiments. We find that either a wino-like or a Higgsino-like neutralino LSP, [Formula: see text] , may provide the cold dark matter (DM), both with similar likelihoods. The upper limit on the DM density from Planck and other experiments enforces [Formula: see text] after the inclusion of Sommerfeld enhancement in its annihilations. If most of the cold DM density is provided by the [Formula: see text] , the measured value of the Higgs mass favours a limited range of [Formula: see text] (and also for [Formula: see text] if [Formula: see text] ) but the scalar mass [Formula: see text] is poorly constrained. In the wino-LSP case, [Formula: see text] is constrained to about [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] to [Formula: see text] , whereas in the Higgsino-LSP case [Formula: see text] has just a lower limit [Formula: see text] ([Formula: see text] ) and [Formula: see text] is constrained to [Formula: see text] in the [Formula: see text] ([Formula: see text] ) scenario. In neither case can the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon, [Formula: see text] , be improved significantly relative to its Standard Model (SM) value, nor do flavour measurements constrain the model significantly, and there are poor prospects for discovering supersymmetric particles at the LHC, though there are some prospects for direct DM detection. On the other hand, if the [Formula: see text] contributes only a fraction of the cold DM density, future LHC [Image: see text]-based searches for gluinos, squarks and heavier chargino and neutralino states as well as disappearing track searches in the wino-like LSP region will be relevant, and interference effects enable [Formula: see text] to agree with the data better than in the SM in the case of wino-like DM with [Formula: see text] .
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5409153
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54091532017-05-15 Likelihood analysis of the minimal AMSB model Bagnaschi, E. Borsato, M. Sakurai, K. Buchmueller, O. Cavanaugh, R. Chobanova, V. Citron, M. Costa, J. C. De Roeck, A. Dolan, M. J. Ellis, J. R. Flächer, H. Heinemeyer, S. Isidori, G. Lucio, M. Luo, F. Santos, D. Martínez Olive, K. A. Richards, A. Weiglein, G. Eur Phys J C Part Fields Regular Article - Theoretical Physics We perform a likelihood analysis of the minimal anomaly-mediated supersymmetry-breaking (mAMSB) model using constraints from cosmology and accelerator experiments. We find that either a wino-like or a Higgsino-like neutralino LSP, [Formula: see text] , may provide the cold dark matter (DM), both with similar likelihoods. The upper limit on the DM density from Planck and other experiments enforces [Formula: see text] after the inclusion of Sommerfeld enhancement in its annihilations. If most of the cold DM density is provided by the [Formula: see text] , the measured value of the Higgs mass favours a limited range of [Formula: see text] (and also for [Formula: see text] if [Formula: see text] ) but the scalar mass [Formula: see text] is poorly constrained. In the wino-LSP case, [Formula: see text] is constrained to about [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] to [Formula: see text] , whereas in the Higgsino-LSP case [Formula: see text] has just a lower limit [Formula: see text] ([Formula: see text] ) and [Formula: see text] is constrained to [Formula: see text] in the [Formula: see text] ([Formula: see text] ) scenario. In neither case can the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon, [Formula: see text] , be improved significantly relative to its Standard Model (SM) value, nor do flavour measurements constrain the model significantly, and there are poor prospects for discovering supersymmetric particles at the LHC, though there are some prospects for direct DM detection. On the other hand, if the [Formula: see text] contributes only a fraction of the cold DM density, future LHC [Image: see text]-based searches for gluinos, squarks and heavier chargino and neutralino states as well as disappearing track searches in the wino-like LSP region will be relevant, and interference effects enable [Formula: see text] to agree with the data better than in the SM in the case of wino-like DM with [Formula: see text] . Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-04-27 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5409153/ /pubmed/28515671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-4810-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. Funded by SCOAP3
spellingShingle Regular Article - Theoretical Physics
Bagnaschi, E.
Borsato, M.
Sakurai, K.
Buchmueller, O.
Cavanaugh, R.
Chobanova, V.
Citron, M.
Costa, J. C.
De Roeck, A.
Dolan, M. J.
Ellis, J. R.
Flächer, H.
Heinemeyer, S.
Isidori, G.
Lucio, M.
Luo, F.
Santos, D. Martínez
Olive, K. A.
Richards, A.
Weiglein, G.
Likelihood analysis of the minimal AMSB model
title Likelihood analysis of the minimal AMSB model
title_full Likelihood analysis of the minimal AMSB model
title_fullStr Likelihood analysis of the minimal AMSB model
title_full_unstemmed Likelihood analysis of the minimal AMSB model
title_short Likelihood analysis of the minimal AMSB model
title_sort likelihood analysis of the minimal amsb model
topic Regular Article - Theoretical Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5409153/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28515671
http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-4810-0
work_keys_str_mv AT bagnaschie likelihoodanalysisoftheminimalamsbmodel
AT borsatom likelihoodanalysisoftheminimalamsbmodel
AT sakuraik likelihoodanalysisoftheminimalamsbmodel
AT buchmuellero likelihoodanalysisoftheminimalamsbmodel
AT cavanaughr likelihoodanalysisoftheminimalamsbmodel
AT chobanovav likelihoodanalysisoftheminimalamsbmodel
AT citronm likelihoodanalysisoftheminimalamsbmodel
AT costajc likelihoodanalysisoftheminimalamsbmodel
AT deroecka likelihoodanalysisoftheminimalamsbmodel
AT dolanmj likelihoodanalysisoftheminimalamsbmodel
AT ellisjr likelihoodanalysisoftheminimalamsbmodel
AT flacherh likelihoodanalysisoftheminimalamsbmodel
AT heinemeyers likelihoodanalysisoftheminimalamsbmodel
AT isidorig likelihoodanalysisoftheminimalamsbmodel
AT luciom likelihoodanalysisoftheminimalamsbmodel
AT luof likelihoodanalysisoftheminimalamsbmodel
AT santosdmartinez likelihoodanalysisoftheminimalamsbmodel
AT oliveka likelihoodanalysisoftheminimalamsbmodel
AT richardsa likelihoodanalysisoftheminimalamsbmodel
AT weigleing likelihoodanalysisoftheminimalamsbmodel