Cargando…
Likelihood analysis of the minimal AMSB model
We perform a likelihood analysis of the minimal anomaly-mediated supersymmetry-breaking (mAMSB) model using constraints from cosmology and accelerator experiments. We find that either a wino-like or a Higgsino-like neutralino LSP, [Formula: see text] , may provide the cold dark matter (DM), both wit...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5409153/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28515671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-4810-0 |
_version_ | 1783232428236603392 |
---|---|
author | Bagnaschi, E. Borsato, M. Sakurai, K. Buchmueller, O. Cavanaugh, R. Chobanova, V. Citron, M. Costa, J. C. De Roeck, A. Dolan, M. J. Ellis, J. R. Flächer, H. Heinemeyer, S. Isidori, G. Lucio, M. Luo, F. Santos, D. Martínez Olive, K. A. Richards, A. Weiglein, G. |
author_facet | Bagnaschi, E. Borsato, M. Sakurai, K. Buchmueller, O. Cavanaugh, R. Chobanova, V. Citron, M. Costa, J. C. De Roeck, A. Dolan, M. J. Ellis, J. R. Flächer, H. Heinemeyer, S. Isidori, G. Lucio, M. Luo, F. Santos, D. Martínez Olive, K. A. Richards, A. Weiglein, G. |
author_sort | Bagnaschi, E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | We perform a likelihood analysis of the minimal anomaly-mediated supersymmetry-breaking (mAMSB) model using constraints from cosmology and accelerator experiments. We find that either a wino-like or a Higgsino-like neutralino LSP, [Formula: see text] , may provide the cold dark matter (DM), both with similar likelihoods. The upper limit on the DM density from Planck and other experiments enforces [Formula: see text] after the inclusion of Sommerfeld enhancement in its annihilations. If most of the cold DM density is provided by the [Formula: see text] , the measured value of the Higgs mass favours a limited range of [Formula: see text] (and also for [Formula: see text] if [Formula: see text] ) but the scalar mass [Formula: see text] is poorly constrained. In the wino-LSP case, [Formula: see text] is constrained to about [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] to [Formula: see text] , whereas in the Higgsino-LSP case [Formula: see text] has just a lower limit [Formula: see text] ([Formula: see text] ) and [Formula: see text] is constrained to [Formula: see text] in the [Formula: see text] ([Formula: see text] ) scenario. In neither case can the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon, [Formula: see text] , be improved significantly relative to its Standard Model (SM) value, nor do flavour measurements constrain the model significantly, and there are poor prospects for discovering supersymmetric particles at the LHC, though there are some prospects for direct DM detection. On the other hand, if the [Formula: see text] contributes only a fraction of the cold DM density, future LHC [Image: see text]-based searches for gluinos, squarks and heavier chargino and neutralino states as well as disappearing track searches in the wino-like LSP region will be relevant, and interference effects enable [Formula: see text] to agree with the data better than in the SM in the case of wino-like DM with [Formula: see text] . |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5409153 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54091532017-05-15 Likelihood analysis of the minimal AMSB model Bagnaschi, E. Borsato, M. Sakurai, K. Buchmueller, O. Cavanaugh, R. Chobanova, V. Citron, M. Costa, J. C. De Roeck, A. Dolan, M. J. Ellis, J. R. Flächer, H. Heinemeyer, S. Isidori, G. Lucio, M. Luo, F. Santos, D. Martínez Olive, K. A. Richards, A. Weiglein, G. Eur Phys J C Part Fields Regular Article - Theoretical Physics We perform a likelihood analysis of the minimal anomaly-mediated supersymmetry-breaking (mAMSB) model using constraints from cosmology and accelerator experiments. We find that either a wino-like or a Higgsino-like neutralino LSP, [Formula: see text] , may provide the cold dark matter (DM), both with similar likelihoods. The upper limit on the DM density from Planck and other experiments enforces [Formula: see text] after the inclusion of Sommerfeld enhancement in its annihilations. If most of the cold DM density is provided by the [Formula: see text] , the measured value of the Higgs mass favours a limited range of [Formula: see text] (and also for [Formula: see text] if [Formula: see text] ) but the scalar mass [Formula: see text] is poorly constrained. In the wino-LSP case, [Formula: see text] is constrained to about [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] to [Formula: see text] , whereas in the Higgsino-LSP case [Formula: see text] has just a lower limit [Formula: see text] ([Formula: see text] ) and [Formula: see text] is constrained to [Formula: see text] in the [Formula: see text] ([Formula: see text] ) scenario. In neither case can the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon, [Formula: see text] , be improved significantly relative to its Standard Model (SM) value, nor do flavour measurements constrain the model significantly, and there are poor prospects for discovering supersymmetric particles at the LHC, though there are some prospects for direct DM detection. On the other hand, if the [Formula: see text] contributes only a fraction of the cold DM density, future LHC [Image: see text]-based searches for gluinos, squarks and heavier chargino and neutralino states as well as disappearing track searches in the wino-like LSP region will be relevant, and interference effects enable [Formula: see text] to agree with the data better than in the SM in the case of wino-like DM with [Formula: see text] . Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-04-27 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5409153/ /pubmed/28515671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-4810-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. Funded by SCOAP3 |
spellingShingle | Regular Article - Theoretical Physics Bagnaschi, E. Borsato, M. Sakurai, K. Buchmueller, O. Cavanaugh, R. Chobanova, V. Citron, M. Costa, J. C. De Roeck, A. Dolan, M. J. Ellis, J. R. Flächer, H. Heinemeyer, S. Isidori, G. Lucio, M. Luo, F. Santos, D. Martínez Olive, K. A. Richards, A. Weiglein, G. Likelihood analysis of the minimal AMSB model |
title | Likelihood analysis of the minimal AMSB model |
title_full | Likelihood analysis of the minimal AMSB model |
title_fullStr | Likelihood analysis of the minimal AMSB model |
title_full_unstemmed | Likelihood analysis of the minimal AMSB model |
title_short | Likelihood analysis of the minimal AMSB model |
title_sort | likelihood analysis of the minimal amsb model |
topic | Regular Article - Theoretical Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5409153/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28515671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-4810-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bagnaschie likelihoodanalysisoftheminimalamsbmodel AT borsatom likelihoodanalysisoftheminimalamsbmodel AT sakuraik likelihoodanalysisoftheminimalamsbmodel AT buchmuellero likelihoodanalysisoftheminimalamsbmodel AT cavanaughr likelihoodanalysisoftheminimalamsbmodel AT chobanovav likelihoodanalysisoftheminimalamsbmodel AT citronm likelihoodanalysisoftheminimalamsbmodel AT costajc likelihoodanalysisoftheminimalamsbmodel AT deroecka likelihoodanalysisoftheminimalamsbmodel AT dolanmj likelihoodanalysisoftheminimalamsbmodel AT ellisjr likelihoodanalysisoftheminimalamsbmodel AT flacherh likelihoodanalysisoftheminimalamsbmodel AT heinemeyers likelihoodanalysisoftheminimalamsbmodel AT isidorig likelihoodanalysisoftheminimalamsbmodel AT luciom likelihoodanalysisoftheminimalamsbmodel AT luof likelihoodanalysisoftheminimalamsbmodel AT santosdmartinez likelihoodanalysisoftheminimalamsbmodel AT oliveka likelihoodanalysisoftheminimalamsbmodel AT richardsa likelihoodanalysisoftheminimalamsbmodel AT weigleing likelihoodanalysisoftheminimalamsbmodel |