Cargando…

On a fractional order calculus model in diffusion weighted breast imaging to differentiate between malignant and benign breast lesions detected on X-ray screening mammography

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a fractional order calculus (FROC) model in diffusion weighted imaging to differentiate between malignant and benign breast lesions in breast cancer screening work-up using recently introduced parameters (β(FROC), D(FROC) and μ(FROC)). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bickelhaupt, Sebastian, Steudle, Franziska, Paech, Daniel, Mlynarska, Anna, Kuder, Tristan Anselm, Lederer, Wolfgang, Daniel, Heidi, Freitag, Martin, Delorme, Stefan, Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter, Laun, Frederik Bernd
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5409173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28453516
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176077
_version_ 1783232433634672640
author Bickelhaupt, Sebastian
Steudle, Franziska
Paech, Daniel
Mlynarska, Anna
Kuder, Tristan Anselm
Lederer, Wolfgang
Daniel, Heidi
Freitag, Martin
Delorme, Stefan
Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter
Laun, Frederik Bernd
author_facet Bickelhaupt, Sebastian
Steudle, Franziska
Paech, Daniel
Mlynarska, Anna
Kuder, Tristan Anselm
Lederer, Wolfgang
Daniel, Heidi
Freitag, Martin
Delorme, Stefan
Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter
Laun, Frederik Bernd
author_sort Bickelhaupt, Sebastian
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a fractional order calculus (FROC) model in diffusion weighted imaging to differentiate between malignant and benign breast lesions in breast cancer screening work-up using recently introduced parameters (β(FROC), D(FROC) and μ(FROC)). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective analysis within a prospective IRB-approved study included 51 participants (mean 58.4 years) after written informed consent. All patients had suspicious screening mammograms and indication for biopsy. Prior to biopsy, full diagnostic contrast-enhanced MRI examination was acquired including diffusion-weighted-imaging (DWI, b = 0,100,750,1500 s/mm(2)). Conventional apparent diffusion coefficient D(app) and FROC parameters (β(FROC), D(FROC) and μ(FROC)) as suggested further indicators of diffusivity components were measured in benign and malignant lesions. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) were calculated to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the parameters. RESULTS: 29/51 patients histopathologically revealed malignant lesions. The analysis revealed an AUC for D(app) of 0.89 (95% CI 0.80–0.98). For FROC derived parameters, AUC was 0.75 (0.60–0.89) for D(FROC), 0.59 (0.43–0.75) for β(FROC) and 0.59 (0.42–0.77) for μ(FROC). Comparison of the AUC curves revealed a significantly higher AUC of D(app) compared to the FROC parameters D(FROC) (p = 0.009), β(FROC) (p = 0.003) and μ(FROC) (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: In contrast to recent description in brain tumors, the apparent diffusion coefficient D(app) showed a significantly higher AUC than the recently proposed FROC parameters β(FROC), D(FROC) and μ(FROC) for differentiating between malignant and benign breast lesions. This might be related to the intrinsic high heterogeneity within breast tissue or to the lower maximal b-value used in our study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5409173
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54091732017-05-12 On a fractional order calculus model in diffusion weighted breast imaging to differentiate between malignant and benign breast lesions detected on X-ray screening mammography Bickelhaupt, Sebastian Steudle, Franziska Paech, Daniel Mlynarska, Anna Kuder, Tristan Anselm Lederer, Wolfgang Daniel, Heidi Freitag, Martin Delorme, Stefan Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter Laun, Frederik Bernd PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a fractional order calculus (FROC) model in diffusion weighted imaging to differentiate between malignant and benign breast lesions in breast cancer screening work-up using recently introduced parameters (β(FROC), D(FROC) and μ(FROC)). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective analysis within a prospective IRB-approved study included 51 participants (mean 58.4 years) after written informed consent. All patients had suspicious screening mammograms and indication for biopsy. Prior to biopsy, full diagnostic contrast-enhanced MRI examination was acquired including diffusion-weighted-imaging (DWI, b = 0,100,750,1500 s/mm(2)). Conventional apparent diffusion coefficient D(app) and FROC parameters (β(FROC), D(FROC) and μ(FROC)) as suggested further indicators of diffusivity components were measured in benign and malignant lesions. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) were calculated to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the parameters. RESULTS: 29/51 patients histopathologically revealed malignant lesions. The analysis revealed an AUC for D(app) of 0.89 (95% CI 0.80–0.98). For FROC derived parameters, AUC was 0.75 (0.60–0.89) for D(FROC), 0.59 (0.43–0.75) for β(FROC) and 0.59 (0.42–0.77) for μ(FROC). Comparison of the AUC curves revealed a significantly higher AUC of D(app) compared to the FROC parameters D(FROC) (p = 0.009), β(FROC) (p = 0.003) and μ(FROC) (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: In contrast to recent description in brain tumors, the apparent diffusion coefficient D(app) showed a significantly higher AUC than the recently proposed FROC parameters β(FROC), D(FROC) and μ(FROC) for differentiating between malignant and benign breast lesions. This might be related to the intrinsic high heterogeneity within breast tissue or to the lower maximal b-value used in our study. Public Library of Science 2017-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5409173/ /pubmed/28453516 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176077 Text en © 2017 Bickelhaupt et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bickelhaupt, Sebastian
Steudle, Franziska
Paech, Daniel
Mlynarska, Anna
Kuder, Tristan Anselm
Lederer, Wolfgang
Daniel, Heidi
Freitag, Martin
Delorme, Stefan
Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter
Laun, Frederik Bernd
On a fractional order calculus model in diffusion weighted breast imaging to differentiate between malignant and benign breast lesions detected on X-ray screening mammography
title On a fractional order calculus model in diffusion weighted breast imaging to differentiate between malignant and benign breast lesions detected on X-ray screening mammography
title_full On a fractional order calculus model in diffusion weighted breast imaging to differentiate between malignant and benign breast lesions detected on X-ray screening mammography
title_fullStr On a fractional order calculus model in diffusion weighted breast imaging to differentiate between malignant and benign breast lesions detected on X-ray screening mammography
title_full_unstemmed On a fractional order calculus model in diffusion weighted breast imaging to differentiate between malignant and benign breast lesions detected on X-ray screening mammography
title_short On a fractional order calculus model in diffusion weighted breast imaging to differentiate between malignant and benign breast lesions detected on X-ray screening mammography
title_sort on a fractional order calculus model in diffusion weighted breast imaging to differentiate between malignant and benign breast lesions detected on x-ray screening mammography
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5409173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28453516
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176077
work_keys_str_mv AT bickelhauptsebastian onafractionalordercalculusmodelindiffusionweightedbreastimagingtodifferentiatebetweenmalignantandbenignbreastlesionsdetectedonxrayscreeningmammography
AT steudlefranziska onafractionalordercalculusmodelindiffusionweightedbreastimagingtodifferentiatebetweenmalignantandbenignbreastlesionsdetectedonxrayscreeningmammography
AT paechdaniel onafractionalordercalculusmodelindiffusionweightedbreastimagingtodifferentiatebetweenmalignantandbenignbreastlesionsdetectedonxrayscreeningmammography
AT mlynarskaanna onafractionalordercalculusmodelindiffusionweightedbreastimagingtodifferentiatebetweenmalignantandbenignbreastlesionsdetectedonxrayscreeningmammography
AT kudertristananselm onafractionalordercalculusmodelindiffusionweightedbreastimagingtodifferentiatebetweenmalignantandbenignbreastlesionsdetectedonxrayscreeningmammography
AT ledererwolfgang onafractionalordercalculusmodelindiffusionweightedbreastimagingtodifferentiatebetweenmalignantandbenignbreastlesionsdetectedonxrayscreeningmammography
AT danielheidi onafractionalordercalculusmodelindiffusionweightedbreastimagingtodifferentiatebetweenmalignantandbenignbreastlesionsdetectedonxrayscreeningmammography
AT freitagmartin onafractionalordercalculusmodelindiffusionweightedbreastimagingtodifferentiatebetweenmalignantandbenignbreastlesionsdetectedonxrayscreeningmammography
AT delormestefan onafractionalordercalculusmodelindiffusionweightedbreastimagingtodifferentiatebetweenmalignantandbenignbreastlesionsdetectedonxrayscreeningmammography
AT schlemmerheinzpeter onafractionalordercalculusmodelindiffusionweightedbreastimagingtodifferentiatebetweenmalignantandbenignbreastlesionsdetectedonxrayscreeningmammography
AT launfrederikbernd onafractionalordercalculusmodelindiffusionweightedbreastimagingtodifferentiatebetweenmalignantandbenignbreastlesionsdetectedonxrayscreeningmammography