Cargando…
On a fractional order calculus model in diffusion weighted breast imaging to differentiate between malignant and benign breast lesions detected on X-ray screening mammography
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a fractional order calculus (FROC) model in diffusion weighted imaging to differentiate between malignant and benign breast lesions in breast cancer screening work-up using recently introduced parameters (β(FROC), D(FROC) and μ(FROC)). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5409173/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28453516 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176077 |
_version_ | 1783232433634672640 |
---|---|
author | Bickelhaupt, Sebastian Steudle, Franziska Paech, Daniel Mlynarska, Anna Kuder, Tristan Anselm Lederer, Wolfgang Daniel, Heidi Freitag, Martin Delorme, Stefan Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter Laun, Frederik Bernd |
author_facet | Bickelhaupt, Sebastian Steudle, Franziska Paech, Daniel Mlynarska, Anna Kuder, Tristan Anselm Lederer, Wolfgang Daniel, Heidi Freitag, Martin Delorme, Stefan Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter Laun, Frederik Bernd |
author_sort | Bickelhaupt, Sebastian |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a fractional order calculus (FROC) model in diffusion weighted imaging to differentiate between malignant and benign breast lesions in breast cancer screening work-up using recently introduced parameters (β(FROC), D(FROC) and μ(FROC)). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective analysis within a prospective IRB-approved study included 51 participants (mean 58.4 years) after written informed consent. All patients had suspicious screening mammograms and indication for biopsy. Prior to biopsy, full diagnostic contrast-enhanced MRI examination was acquired including diffusion-weighted-imaging (DWI, b = 0,100,750,1500 s/mm(2)). Conventional apparent diffusion coefficient D(app) and FROC parameters (β(FROC), D(FROC) and μ(FROC)) as suggested further indicators of diffusivity components were measured in benign and malignant lesions. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) were calculated to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the parameters. RESULTS: 29/51 patients histopathologically revealed malignant lesions. The analysis revealed an AUC for D(app) of 0.89 (95% CI 0.80–0.98). For FROC derived parameters, AUC was 0.75 (0.60–0.89) for D(FROC), 0.59 (0.43–0.75) for β(FROC) and 0.59 (0.42–0.77) for μ(FROC). Comparison of the AUC curves revealed a significantly higher AUC of D(app) compared to the FROC parameters D(FROC) (p = 0.009), β(FROC) (p = 0.003) and μ(FROC) (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: In contrast to recent description in brain tumors, the apparent diffusion coefficient D(app) showed a significantly higher AUC than the recently proposed FROC parameters β(FROC), D(FROC) and μ(FROC) for differentiating between malignant and benign breast lesions. This might be related to the intrinsic high heterogeneity within breast tissue or to the lower maximal b-value used in our study. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5409173 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54091732017-05-12 On a fractional order calculus model in diffusion weighted breast imaging to differentiate between malignant and benign breast lesions detected on X-ray screening mammography Bickelhaupt, Sebastian Steudle, Franziska Paech, Daniel Mlynarska, Anna Kuder, Tristan Anselm Lederer, Wolfgang Daniel, Heidi Freitag, Martin Delorme, Stefan Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter Laun, Frederik Bernd PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a fractional order calculus (FROC) model in diffusion weighted imaging to differentiate between malignant and benign breast lesions in breast cancer screening work-up using recently introduced parameters (β(FROC), D(FROC) and μ(FROC)). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective analysis within a prospective IRB-approved study included 51 participants (mean 58.4 years) after written informed consent. All patients had suspicious screening mammograms and indication for biopsy. Prior to biopsy, full diagnostic contrast-enhanced MRI examination was acquired including diffusion-weighted-imaging (DWI, b = 0,100,750,1500 s/mm(2)). Conventional apparent diffusion coefficient D(app) and FROC parameters (β(FROC), D(FROC) and μ(FROC)) as suggested further indicators of diffusivity components were measured in benign and malignant lesions. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) were calculated to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the parameters. RESULTS: 29/51 patients histopathologically revealed malignant lesions. The analysis revealed an AUC for D(app) of 0.89 (95% CI 0.80–0.98). For FROC derived parameters, AUC was 0.75 (0.60–0.89) for D(FROC), 0.59 (0.43–0.75) for β(FROC) and 0.59 (0.42–0.77) for μ(FROC). Comparison of the AUC curves revealed a significantly higher AUC of D(app) compared to the FROC parameters D(FROC) (p = 0.009), β(FROC) (p = 0.003) and μ(FROC) (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: In contrast to recent description in brain tumors, the apparent diffusion coefficient D(app) showed a significantly higher AUC than the recently proposed FROC parameters β(FROC), D(FROC) and μ(FROC) for differentiating between malignant and benign breast lesions. This might be related to the intrinsic high heterogeneity within breast tissue or to the lower maximal b-value used in our study. Public Library of Science 2017-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5409173/ /pubmed/28453516 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176077 Text en © 2017 Bickelhaupt et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Bickelhaupt, Sebastian Steudle, Franziska Paech, Daniel Mlynarska, Anna Kuder, Tristan Anselm Lederer, Wolfgang Daniel, Heidi Freitag, Martin Delorme, Stefan Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter Laun, Frederik Bernd On a fractional order calculus model in diffusion weighted breast imaging to differentiate between malignant and benign breast lesions detected on X-ray screening mammography |
title | On a fractional order calculus model in diffusion weighted breast imaging to differentiate between malignant and benign breast lesions detected on X-ray screening mammography |
title_full | On a fractional order calculus model in diffusion weighted breast imaging to differentiate between malignant and benign breast lesions detected on X-ray screening mammography |
title_fullStr | On a fractional order calculus model in diffusion weighted breast imaging to differentiate between malignant and benign breast lesions detected on X-ray screening mammography |
title_full_unstemmed | On a fractional order calculus model in diffusion weighted breast imaging to differentiate between malignant and benign breast lesions detected on X-ray screening mammography |
title_short | On a fractional order calculus model in diffusion weighted breast imaging to differentiate between malignant and benign breast lesions detected on X-ray screening mammography |
title_sort | on a fractional order calculus model in diffusion weighted breast imaging to differentiate between malignant and benign breast lesions detected on x-ray screening mammography |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5409173/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28453516 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176077 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bickelhauptsebastian onafractionalordercalculusmodelindiffusionweightedbreastimagingtodifferentiatebetweenmalignantandbenignbreastlesionsdetectedonxrayscreeningmammography AT steudlefranziska onafractionalordercalculusmodelindiffusionweightedbreastimagingtodifferentiatebetweenmalignantandbenignbreastlesionsdetectedonxrayscreeningmammography AT paechdaniel onafractionalordercalculusmodelindiffusionweightedbreastimagingtodifferentiatebetweenmalignantandbenignbreastlesionsdetectedonxrayscreeningmammography AT mlynarskaanna onafractionalordercalculusmodelindiffusionweightedbreastimagingtodifferentiatebetweenmalignantandbenignbreastlesionsdetectedonxrayscreeningmammography AT kudertristananselm onafractionalordercalculusmodelindiffusionweightedbreastimagingtodifferentiatebetweenmalignantandbenignbreastlesionsdetectedonxrayscreeningmammography AT ledererwolfgang onafractionalordercalculusmodelindiffusionweightedbreastimagingtodifferentiatebetweenmalignantandbenignbreastlesionsdetectedonxrayscreeningmammography AT danielheidi onafractionalordercalculusmodelindiffusionweightedbreastimagingtodifferentiatebetweenmalignantandbenignbreastlesionsdetectedonxrayscreeningmammography AT freitagmartin onafractionalordercalculusmodelindiffusionweightedbreastimagingtodifferentiatebetweenmalignantandbenignbreastlesionsdetectedonxrayscreeningmammography AT delormestefan onafractionalordercalculusmodelindiffusionweightedbreastimagingtodifferentiatebetweenmalignantandbenignbreastlesionsdetectedonxrayscreeningmammography AT schlemmerheinzpeter onafractionalordercalculusmodelindiffusionweightedbreastimagingtodifferentiatebetweenmalignantandbenignbreastlesionsdetectedonxrayscreeningmammography AT launfrederikbernd onafractionalordercalculusmodelindiffusionweightedbreastimagingtodifferentiatebetweenmalignantandbenignbreastlesionsdetectedonxrayscreeningmammography |