Cargando…
Stenting versus non-stenting treatment of intermediate stenosis culprit lesion in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a multicenter randomized clinical trial
BACKGROUND: The benefit/risk ratio of stenting in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with single vessel intermediate stenosis culprit lesions merits further study, therefore the subject of the present study. METHODS AND RESULTS: It was a prospective, multicenter, rando...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Science Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5409352/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28491085 http://dx.doi.org/10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2017.02.005 |
_version_ | 1783232459799789568 |
---|---|
author | Dai, Jing Lyu, Shu-Zheng Chen, Yun-Dai Song, Xian-Tao Zhang, Min Li, Wei-Min Zheng, Yang Wen, Shang-Yu Nie, Shao-Ping Zeng, Yu-Jie Gao, Hai Ma, Yi-Tong Zhang, Shu-Yang Guo, Li-Jun Zhang, Zheng |
author_facet | Dai, Jing Lyu, Shu-Zheng Chen, Yun-Dai Song, Xian-Tao Zhang, Min Li, Wei-Min Zheng, Yang Wen, Shang-Yu Nie, Shao-Ping Zeng, Yu-Jie Gao, Hai Ma, Yi-Tong Zhang, Shu-Yang Guo, Li-Jun Zhang, Zheng |
author_sort | Dai, Jing |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The benefit/risk ratio of stenting in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with single vessel intermediate stenosis culprit lesions merits further study, therefore the subject of the present study. METHODS AND RESULTS: It was a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial. Between April 2012 and July 2015, 399 acute STEMI patients with single vessel disease and intermediate (40%–70%) stenosis of the culprit lesion before or after aspiration thrombectomy and/or intracoronary tirofiban (15 µg/kg) were enrolled and were randomly assigned (1: 1) to stenting group (n = 201) and non-stenting group (n = 198). In stenting group, patients received pharmacologic therapy plus standard percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stent implantation. In non-stenting group, patients received pharmacologic therapy and PCI (thrombectomy), but without dilatation or stenting. Primary endpoint was 12-month rate of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), a composite of cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), repeat revascularization and stroke. Secondary endpoints were 12-month rates of all cause death, ischemia driven admission and bleeding complication. Median follow-up time was 12.4 ± 3.1 months. At 12 months, MACCE occurred in 8.0% of the patients in stenting group, as compared with 15.2% in the non-stenting group (adjusted HR: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.19–0.89, P = 0.02). The stenting group had lower non-fatal MI rate than non-stenting group, (1.5% vs. 5.5%, P = 0.03). The two groups shared similar cardiac death, repeat revascularization, stroke, all cause death, ischemia driven readmission and bleeding rates at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Stent implantation had better efficacy and safety in reducing MACCE risks among acute STEMI patients with single vessel intermediate stenosis culprit lesions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5409352 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Science Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54093522017-05-10 Stenting versus non-stenting treatment of intermediate stenosis culprit lesion in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a multicenter randomized clinical trial Dai, Jing Lyu, Shu-Zheng Chen, Yun-Dai Song, Xian-Tao Zhang, Min Li, Wei-Min Zheng, Yang Wen, Shang-Yu Nie, Shao-Ping Zeng, Yu-Jie Gao, Hai Ma, Yi-Tong Zhang, Shu-Yang Guo, Li-Jun Zhang, Zheng J Geriatr Cardiol Research Article BACKGROUND: The benefit/risk ratio of stenting in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with single vessel intermediate stenosis culprit lesions merits further study, therefore the subject of the present study. METHODS AND RESULTS: It was a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial. Between April 2012 and July 2015, 399 acute STEMI patients with single vessel disease and intermediate (40%–70%) stenosis of the culprit lesion before or after aspiration thrombectomy and/or intracoronary tirofiban (15 µg/kg) were enrolled and were randomly assigned (1: 1) to stenting group (n = 201) and non-stenting group (n = 198). In stenting group, patients received pharmacologic therapy plus standard percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stent implantation. In non-stenting group, patients received pharmacologic therapy and PCI (thrombectomy), but without dilatation or stenting. Primary endpoint was 12-month rate of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), a composite of cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), repeat revascularization and stroke. Secondary endpoints were 12-month rates of all cause death, ischemia driven admission and bleeding complication. Median follow-up time was 12.4 ± 3.1 months. At 12 months, MACCE occurred in 8.0% of the patients in stenting group, as compared with 15.2% in the non-stenting group (adjusted HR: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.19–0.89, P = 0.02). The stenting group had lower non-fatal MI rate than non-stenting group, (1.5% vs. 5.5%, P = 0.03). The two groups shared similar cardiac death, repeat revascularization, stroke, all cause death, ischemia driven readmission and bleeding rates at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Stent implantation had better efficacy and safety in reducing MACCE risks among acute STEMI patients with single vessel intermediate stenosis culprit lesions. Science Press 2017-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5409352/ /pubmed/28491085 http://dx.doi.org/10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2017.02.005 Text en Institute of Geriatric Cardiology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License, which allows readers to alter, transform, or build upon the article and then distribute the resulting work under the same or similar license to this one. The work must be attributed back to the original author and commercial use is not permitted without specific permission. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Dai, Jing Lyu, Shu-Zheng Chen, Yun-Dai Song, Xian-Tao Zhang, Min Li, Wei-Min Zheng, Yang Wen, Shang-Yu Nie, Shao-Ping Zeng, Yu-Jie Gao, Hai Ma, Yi-Tong Zhang, Shu-Yang Guo, Li-Jun Zhang, Zheng Stenting versus non-stenting treatment of intermediate stenosis culprit lesion in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a multicenter randomized clinical trial |
title | Stenting versus non-stenting treatment of intermediate stenosis culprit lesion in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a multicenter randomized clinical trial |
title_full | Stenting versus non-stenting treatment of intermediate stenosis culprit lesion in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a multicenter randomized clinical trial |
title_fullStr | Stenting versus non-stenting treatment of intermediate stenosis culprit lesion in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a multicenter randomized clinical trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Stenting versus non-stenting treatment of intermediate stenosis culprit lesion in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a multicenter randomized clinical trial |
title_short | Stenting versus non-stenting treatment of intermediate stenosis culprit lesion in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a multicenter randomized clinical trial |
title_sort | stenting versus non-stenting treatment of intermediate stenosis culprit lesion in acute st-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a multicenter randomized clinical trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5409352/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28491085 http://dx.doi.org/10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2017.02.005 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT daijing stentingversusnonstentingtreatmentofintermediatestenosisculpritlesioninacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial AT lyushuzheng stentingversusnonstentingtreatmentofintermediatestenosisculpritlesioninacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial AT chenyundai stentingversusnonstentingtreatmentofintermediatestenosisculpritlesioninacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial AT songxiantao stentingversusnonstentingtreatmentofintermediatestenosisculpritlesioninacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial AT zhangmin stentingversusnonstentingtreatmentofintermediatestenosisculpritlesioninacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial AT liweimin stentingversusnonstentingtreatmentofintermediatestenosisculpritlesioninacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial AT zhengyang stentingversusnonstentingtreatmentofintermediatestenosisculpritlesioninacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial AT wenshangyu stentingversusnonstentingtreatmentofintermediatestenosisculpritlesioninacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial AT nieshaoping stentingversusnonstentingtreatmentofintermediatestenosisculpritlesioninacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial AT zengyujie stentingversusnonstentingtreatmentofintermediatestenosisculpritlesioninacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial AT gaohai stentingversusnonstentingtreatmentofintermediatestenosisculpritlesioninacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial AT mayitong stentingversusnonstentingtreatmentofintermediatestenosisculpritlesioninacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial AT zhangshuyang stentingversusnonstentingtreatmentofintermediatestenosisculpritlesioninacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial AT guolijun stentingversusnonstentingtreatmentofintermediatestenosisculpritlesioninacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial AT zhangzheng stentingversusnonstentingtreatmentofintermediatestenosisculpritlesioninacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial |