Cargando…

Stenting versus non-stenting treatment of intermediate stenosis culprit lesion in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a multicenter randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND: The benefit/risk ratio of stenting in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with single vessel intermediate stenosis culprit lesions merits further study, therefore the subject of the present study. METHODS AND RESULTS: It was a prospective, multicenter, rando...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dai, Jing, Lyu, Shu-Zheng, Chen, Yun-Dai, Song, Xian-Tao, Zhang, Min, Li, Wei-Min, Zheng, Yang, Wen, Shang-Yu, Nie, Shao-Ping, Zeng, Yu-Jie, Gao, Hai, Ma, Yi-Tong, Zhang, Shu-Yang, Guo, Li-Jun, Zhang, Zheng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Science Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5409352/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28491085
http://dx.doi.org/10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2017.02.005
_version_ 1783232459799789568
author Dai, Jing
Lyu, Shu-Zheng
Chen, Yun-Dai
Song, Xian-Tao
Zhang, Min
Li, Wei-Min
Zheng, Yang
Wen, Shang-Yu
Nie, Shao-Ping
Zeng, Yu-Jie
Gao, Hai
Ma, Yi-Tong
Zhang, Shu-Yang
Guo, Li-Jun
Zhang, Zheng
author_facet Dai, Jing
Lyu, Shu-Zheng
Chen, Yun-Dai
Song, Xian-Tao
Zhang, Min
Li, Wei-Min
Zheng, Yang
Wen, Shang-Yu
Nie, Shao-Ping
Zeng, Yu-Jie
Gao, Hai
Ma, Yi-Tong
Zhang, Shu-Yang
Guo, Li-Jun
Zhang, Zheng
author_sort Dai, Jing
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The benefit/risk ratio of stenting in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with single vessel intermediate stenosis culprit lesions merits further study, therefore the subject of the present study. METHODS AND RESULTS: It was a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial. Between April 2012 and July 2015, 399 acute STEMI patients with single vessel disease and intermediate (40%–70%) stenosis of the culprit lesion before or after aspiration thrombectomy and/or intracoronary tirofiban (15 µg/kg) were enrolled and were randomly assigned (1: 1) to stenting group (n = 201) and non-stenting group (n = 198). In stenting group, patients received pharmacologic therapy plus standard percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stent implantation. In non-stenting group, patients received pharmacologic therapy and PCI (thrombectomy), but without dilatation or stenting. Primary endpoint was 12-month rate of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), a composite of cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), repeat revascularization and stroke. Secondary endpoints were 12-month rates of all cause death, ischemia driven admission and bleeding complication. Median follow-up time was 12.4 ± 3.1 months. At 12 months, MACCE occurred in 8.0% of the patients in stenting group, as compared with 15.2% in the non-stenting group (adjusted HR: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.19–0.89, P = 0.02). The stenting group had lower non-fatal MI rate than non-stenting group, (1.5% vs. 5.5%, P = 0.03). The two groups shared similar cardiac death, repeat revascularization, stroke, all cause death, ischemia driven readmission and bleeding rates at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Stent implantation had better efficacy and safety in reducing MACCE risks among acute STEMI patients with single vessel intermediate stenosis culprit lesions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5409352
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Science Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54093522017-05-10 Stenting versus non-stenting treatment of intermediate stenosis culprit lesion in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a multicenter randomized clinical trial Dai, Jing Lyu, Shu-Zheng Chen, Yun-Dai Song, Xian-Tao Zhang, Min Li, Wei-Min Zheng, Yang Wen, Shang-Yu Nie, Shao-Ping Zeng, Yu-Jie Gao, Hai Ma, Yi-Tong Zhang, Shu-Yang Guo, Li-Jun Zhang, Zheng J Geriatr Cardiol Research Article BACKGROUND: The benefit/risk ratio of stenting in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with single vessel intermediate stenosis culprit lesions merits further study, therefore the subject of the present study. METHODS AND RESULTS: It was a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial. Between April 2012 and July 2015, 399 acute STEMI patients with single vessel disease and intermediate (40%–70%) stenosis of the culprit lesion before or after aspiration thrombectomy and/or intracoronary tirofiban (15 µg/kg) were enrolled and were randomly assigned (1: 1) to stenting group (n = 201) and non-stenting group (n = 198). In stenting group, patients received pharmacologic therapy plus standard percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stent implantation. In non-stenting group, patients received pharmacologic therapy and PCI (thrombectomy), but without dilatation or stenting. Primary endpoint was 12-month rate of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), a composite of cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), repeat revascularization and stroke. Secondary endpoints were 12-month rates of all cause death, ischemia driven admission and bleeding complication. Median follow-up time was 12.4 ± 3.1 months. At 12 months, MACCE occurred in 8.0% of the patients in stenting group, as compared with 15.2% in the non-stenting group (adjusted HR: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.19–0.89, P = 0.02). The stenting group had lower non-fatal MI rate than non-stenting group, (1.5% vs. 5.5%, P = 0.03). The two groups shared similar cardiac death, repeat revascularization, stroke, all cause death, ischemia driven readmission and bleeding rates at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Stent implantation had better efficacy and safety in reducing MACCE risks among acute STEMI patients with single vessel intermediate stenosis culprit lesions. Science Press 2017-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5409352/ /pubmed/28491085 http://dx.doi.org/10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2017.02.005 Text en Institute of Geriatric Cardiology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License, which allows readers to alter, transform, or build upon the article and then distribute the resulting work under the same or similar license to this one. The work must be attributed back to the original author and commercial use is not permitted without specific permission.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dai, Jing
Lyu, Shu-Zheng
Chen, Yun-Dai
Song, Xian-Tao
Zhang, Min
Li, Wei-Min
Zheng, Yang
Wen, Shang-Yu
Nie, Shao-Ping
Zeng, Yu-Jie
Gao, Hai
Ma, Yi-Tong
Zhang, Shu-Yang
Guo, Li-Jun
Zhang, Zheng
Stenting versus non-stenting treatment of intermediate stenosis culprit lesion in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a multicenter randomized clinical trial
title Stenting versus non-stenting treatment of intermediate stenosis culprit lesion in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a multicenter randomized clinical trial
title_full Stenting versus non-stenting treatment of intermediate stenosis culprit lesion in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a multicenter randomized clinical trial
title_fullStr Stenting versus non-stenting treatment of intermediate stenosis culprit lesion in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a multicenter randomized clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Stenting versus non-stenting treatment of intermediate stenosis culprit lesion in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a multicenter randomized clinical trial
title_short Stenting versus non-stenting treatment of intermediate stenosis culprit lesion in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a multicenter randomized clinical trial
title_sort stenting versus non-stenting treatment of intermediate stenosis culprit lesion in acute st-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a multicenter randomized clinical trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5409352/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28491085
http://dx.doi.org/10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2017.02.005
work_keys_str_mv AT daijing stentingversusnonstentingtreatmentofintermediatestenosisculpritlesioninacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT lyushuzheng stentingversusnonstentingtreatmentofintermediatestenosisculpritlesioninacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT chenyundai stentingversusnonstentingtreatmentofintermediatestenosisculpritlesioninacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT songxiantao stentingversusnonstentingtreatmentofintermediatestenosisculpritlesioninacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT zhangmin stentingversusnonstentingtreatmentofintermediatestenosisculpritlesioninacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT liweimin stentingversusnonstentingtreatmentofintermediatestenosisculpritlesioninacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT zhengyang stentingversusnonstentingtreatmentofintermediatestenosisculpritlesioninacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT wenshangyu stentingversusnonstentingtreatmentofintermediatestenosisculpritlesioninacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT nieshaoping stentingversusnonstentingtreatmentofintermediatestenosisculpritlesioninacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT zengyujie stentingversusnonstentingtreatmentofintermediatestenosisculpritlesioninacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT gaohai stentingversusnonstentingtreatmentofintermediatestenosisculpritlesioninacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT mayitong stentingversusnonstentingtreatmentofintermediatestenosisculpritlesioninacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT zhangshuyang stentingversusnonstentingtreatmentofintermediatestenosisculpritlesioninacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT guolijun stentingversusnonstentingtreatmentofintermediatestenosisculpritlesioninacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT zhangzheng stentingversusnonstentingtreatmentofintermediatestenosisculpritlesioninacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial