Cargando…

Effect of Referral Patterns and Treatment Type on Oncologic Outcomes for Women with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ

OBJECTIVE: Management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) remains controversial. This study examined long-term outcomes in a population-based cohort of patients with pure DCIS treated with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) alone, BCS + radiotherapy (RT), and mastectomy. Outcomes were compared between p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wai, Elaine S, Lesperance, Mary, Lu, Linghong, Alexander, Cheryl S, Truong, Pauline T
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5409819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28465875
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.1128
_version_ 1783232554283827200
author Wai, Elaine S
Lesperance, Mary
Lu, Linghong
Alexander, Cheryl S
Truong, Pauline T
author_facet Wai, Elaine S
Lesperance, Mary
Lu, Linghong
Alexander, Cheryl S
Truong, Pauline T
author_sort Wai, Elaine S
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) remains controversial. This study examined long-term outcomes in a population-based cohort of patients with pure DCIS treated with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) alone, BCS + radiotherapy (RT), and mastectomy. Outcomes were compared between patients referred versus not referred for oncologic assessment after definitive surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subjects were 2575 women diagnosed between 1985 and 1999. Data from several electronic databases were linked and analyzed. Outcomes were invasive local recurrence-free survival (ILRFS), mastectomy-free survival (MFS), breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Median follow-up time was 9.8 years. Overall, 56% (n = 1448) of subjects were referred to a cancer centre. Factors associated with non-referral were older age, comorbidities, and travel distance. Ten-year MFS, BCSS, and OS were higher among referred patients (all p ≤ 0.001). In cohorts treated with BCS alone (n = 1314) vs. BCS + RT (n = 510) vs. mastectomy (n = 751), 10-year ILRFS were 93.7% vs. 96.6% vs. 97.7%, (p < 0.001) and BCSS were 97.6% vs. 99.8% vs. 98.6%, (p = 0.01). Corresponding rates of ipsilateral invasive breast relapse at 10 years were 6.3% after BCS alone, 3.4% after BCS + RT, and 2.3% after mastectomy (p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, factors associated with improved ILRFS were older age at diagnosis, low comorbidity score, absence of comedo histology, mastectomy, and post-BCS RT. CONCLUSION: Patients with DCIS referred for oncologic assessment were more likely to undergo post-BCS RT, resulting in lower mastectomy and higher survival rates compared to non-referred patients. Patients with significant comorbidities were less likely to be referred and experienced lower ILRFS and BCSS. Referral for multidisciplinary oncologic assessment after surgery is warranted to individualize management and optimize outcomes for patients with DCIS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5409819
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54098192017-05-02 Effect of Referral Patterns and Treatment Type on Oncologic Outcomes for Women with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Wai, Elaine S Lesperance, Mary Lu, Linghong Alexander, Cheryl S Truong, Pauline T Cureus Oncology OBJECTIVE: Management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) remains controversial. This study examined long-term outcomes in a population-based cohort of patients with pure DCIS treated with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) alone, BCS + radiotherapy (RT), and mastectomy. Outcomes were compared between patients referred versus not referred for oncologic assessment after definitive surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subjects were 2575 women diagnosed between 1985 and 1999. Data from several electronic databases were linked and analyzed. Outcomes were invasive local recurrence-free survival (ILRFS), mastectomy-free survival (MFS), breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Median follow-up time was 9.8 years. Overall, 56% (n = 1448) of subjects were referred to a cancer centre. Factors associated with non-referral were older age, comorbidities, and travel distance. Ten-year MFS, BCSS, and OS were higher among referred patients (all p ≤ 0.001). In cohorts treated with BCS alone (n = 1314) vs. BCS + RT (n = 510) vs. mastectomy (n = 751), 10-year ILRFS were 93.7% vs. 96.6% vs. 97.7%, (p < 0.001) and BCSS were 97.6% vs. 99.8% vs. 98.6%, (p = 0.01). Corresponding rates of ipsilateral invasive breast relapse at 10 years were 6.3% after BCS alone, 3.4% after BCS + RT, and 2.3% after mastectomy (p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, factors associated with improved ILRFS were older age at diagnosis, low comorbidity score, absence of comedo histology, mastectomy, and post-BCS RT. CONCLUSION: Patients with DCIS referred for oncologic assessment were more likely to undergo post-BCS RT, resulting in lower mastectomy and higher survival rates compared to non-referred patients. Patients with significant comorbidities were less likely to be referred and experienced lower ILRFS and BCSS. Referral for multidisciplinary oncologic assessment after surgery is warranted to individualize management and optimize outcomes for patients with DCIS. Cureus 2017-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5409819/ /pubmed/28465875 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.1128 Text en Copyright © 2017, Wai et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Oncology
Wai, Elaine S
Lesperance, Mary
Lu, Linghong
Alexander, Cheryl S
Truong, Pauline T
Effect of Referral Patterns and Treatment Type on Oncologic Outcomes for Women with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ
title Effect of Referral Patterns and Treatment Type on Oncologic Outcomes for Women with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ
title_full Effect of Referral Patterns and Treatment Type on Oncologic Outcomes for Women with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ
title_fullStr Effect of Referral Patterns and Treatment Type on Oncologic Outcomes for Women with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Referral Patterns and Treatment Type on Oncologic Outcomes for Women with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ
title_short Effect of Referral Patterns and Treatment Type on Oncologic Outcomes for Women with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ
title_sort effect of referral patterns and treatment type on oncologic outcomes for women with ductal carcinoma in situ
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5409819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28465875
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.1128
work_keys_str_mv AT waielaines effectofreferralpatternsandtreatmenttypeononcologicoutcomesforwomenwithductalcarcinomainsitu
AT lesperancemary effectofreferralpatternsandtreatmenttypeononcologicoutcomesforwomenwithductalcarcinomainsitu
AT lulinghong effectofreferralpatternsandtreatmenttypeononcologicoutcomesforwomenwithductalcarcinomainsitu
AT alexandercheryls effectofreferralpatternsandtreatmenttypeononcologicoutcomesforwomenwithductalcarcinomainsitu
AT truongpaulinet effectofreferralpatternsandtreatmenttypeononcologicoutcomesforwomenwithductalcarcinomainsitu