Cargando…

Public priorities for osteoporosis and fracture research: results from a general population survey

SUMMARY: This is the first national study of public and patient research priorities in osteoporosis and fracture. We have identified new research areas of importance to members of the public, particularly ‘access to information from health professionals’. The findings are being incorporated into the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paskins, Zoe, Jinks, Clare, Mahmood, Waheed, Jayakumar, Prakash, Sangan, Caroline B., Belcher, John, Gwilym, Stephen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer London 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5409917/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28455735
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11657-017-0340-5
_version_ 1783232562437554176
author Paskins, Zoe
Jinks, Clare
Mahmood, Waheed
Jayakumar, Prakash
Sangan, Caroline B.
Belcher, John
Gwilym, Stephen
author_facet Paskins, Zoe
Jinks, Clare
Mahmood, Waheed
Jayakumar, Prakash
Sangan, Caroline B.
Belcher, John
Gwilym, Stephen
author_sort Paskins, Zoe
collection PubMed
description SUMMARY: This is the first national study of public and patient research priorities in osteoporosis and fracture. We have identified new research areas of importance to members of the public, particularly ‘access to information from health professionals’. The findings are being incorporated into the research strategy of the National Osteoporosis Society. PURPOSE: This study aimed to prioritise, with patients and public members, research topics for the osteoporosis research agenda. METHODS: An e-survey to identify topics for research was co-designed with patient representatives. A link to the e-survey was disseminated to supporters of the UK National Osteoporosis Society (NOS) in a monthly e-newsletter. Responders were asked to indicate their top priority for research across four topics (understanding and preventing osteoporosis, living with osteoporosis, treating osteoporosis and treating fractures) and their top three items within each topic. Descriptive statistics were used to describe demographics and item ranking. A latent class analysis was applied to identify a substantive number of clusters with different combinations of binary responses. RESULTS: One thousand one hundred eighty-eight (7.4%) respondents completed the e-survey. The top three items overall were ‘Having easy access to advice and information from health professionals’ (63.8%), ‘Understanding further the safety and benefit of osteoporosis drug treatments’ (49.9%) and ‘Identifying the condition early by screening’ (49.2%). Latent class analysis revealed distinct clusters of responses within each topic including primary care management and self-management. Those without a history of prior fracture or aged under 70 were more likely to rate items within the cluster of self-management as important (21.0 vs 12.9 and 19.8 vs 13.3%, respectively). CONCLUSION: This is the first study of public research priorities in osteoporosis and has identified new research areas of importance to members of the public including access to information. The findings are being incorporated into the research strategy of the National Osteoporosis Society. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11657-017-0340-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5409917
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer London
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54099172017-05-15 Public priorities for osteoporosis and fracture research: results from a general population survey Paskins, Zoe Jinks, Clare Mahmood, Waheed Jayakumar, Prakash Sangan, Caroline B. Belcher, John Gwilym, Stephen Arch Osteoporos Original Article SUMMARY: This is the first national study of public and patient research priorities in osteoporosis and fracture. We have identified new research areas of importance to members of the public, particularly ‘access to information from health professionals’. The findings are being incorporated into the research strategy of the National Osteoporosis Society. PURPOSE: This study aimed to prioritise, with patients and public members, research topics for the osteoporosis research agenda. METHODS: An e-survey to identify topics for research was co-designed with patient representatives. A link to the e-survey was disseminated to supporters of the UK National Osteoporosis Society (NOS) in a monthly e-newsletter. Responders were asked to indicate their top priority for research across four topics (understanding and preventing osteoporosis, living with osteoporosis, treating osteoporosis and treating fractures) and their top three items within each topic. Descriptive statistics were used to describe demographics and item ranking. A latent class analysis was applied to identify a substantive number of clusters with different combinations of binary responses. RESULTS: One thousand one hundred eighty-eight (7.4%) respondents completed the e-survey. The top three items overall were ‘Having easy access to advice and information from health professionals’ (63.8%), ‘Understanding further the safety and benefit of osteoporosis drug treatments’ (49.9%) and ‘Identifying the condition early by screening’ (49.2%). Latent class analysis revealed distinct clusters of responses within each topic including primary care management and self-management. Those without a history of prior fracture or aged under 70 were more likely to rate items within the cluster of self-management as important (21.0 vs 12.9 and 19.8 vs 13.3%, respectively). CONCLUSION: This is the first study of public research priorities in osteoporosis and has identified new research areas of importance to members of the public including access to information. The findings are being incorporated into the research strategy of the National Osteoporosis Society. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11657-017-0340-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer London 2017-04-28 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5409917/ /pubmed/28455735 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11657-017-0340-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Paskins, Zoe
Jinks, Clare
Mahmood, Waheed
Jayakumar, Prakash
Sangan, Caroline B.
Belcher, John
Gwilym, Stephen
Public priorities for osteoporosis and fracture research: results from a general population survey
title Public priorities for osteoporosis and fracture research: results from a general population survey
title_full Public priorities for osteoporosis and fracture research: results from a general population survey
title_fullStr Public priorities for osteoporosis and fracture research: results from a general population survey
title_full_unstemmed Public priorities for osteoporosis and fracture research: results from a general population survey
title_short Public priorities for osteoporosis and fracture research: results from a general population survey
title_sort public priorities for osteoporosis and fracture research: results from a general population survey
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5409917/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28455735
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11657-017-0340-5
work_keys_str_mv AT paskinszoe publicprioritiesforosteoporosisandfractureresearchresultsfromageneralpopulationsurvey
AT jinksclare publicprioritiesforosteoporosisandfractureresearchresultsfromageneralpopulationsurvey
AT mahmoodwaheed publicprioritiesforosteoporosisandfractureresearchresultsfromageneralpopulationsurvey
AT jayakumarprakash publicprioritiesforosteoporosisandfractureresearchresultsfromageneralpopulationsurvey
AT sangancarolineb publicprioritiesforosteoporosisandfractureresearchresultsfromageneralpopulationsurvey
AT belcherjohn publicprioritiesforosteoporosisandfractureresearchresultsfromageneralpopulationsurvey
AT gwilymstephen publicprioritiesforosteoporosisandfractureresearchresultsfromageneralpopulationsurvey