Cargando…
Evaluation of a community-based hypertension improvement program (ComHIP) in Ghana: data from a baseline survey
BACKGROUND: Ghana faces an increasing burden of non-communicable disease with rates of hypertension estimated as high as 36% in adults. Despite these high rates, hypertension control remains very poor in Ghana (4%). The current project aims to implement and evaluate a community-based programme to ra...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5410035/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28454523 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4260-5 |
_version_ | 1783232591281782784 |
---|---|
author | Lamptey, Peter Laar, Amos Adler, Alma J. Dirks, Rebecca Caldwell, Aya Prieto-Merino, David Aerts, Ann Pearce, Neil Perel, Pablo |
author_facet | Lamptey, Peter Laar, Amos Adler, Alma J. Dirks, Rebecca Caldwell, Aya Prieto-Merino, David Aerts, Ann Pearce, Neil Perel, Pablo |
author_sort | Lamptey, Peter |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Ghana faces an increasing burden of non-communicable disease with rates of hypertension estimated as high as 36% in adults. Despite these high rates, hypertension control remains very poor in Ghana (4%). The current project aims to implement and evaluate a community-based programme to raise awareness, and to improve treatment and control of hypertension in the Eastern Region of Ghana. In this paper, we present the findings of the baseline cross-sectional survey focusing on hypertension prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control. METHODS: To evaluate the ComHIP project, a quasi-experimental design consisted of a before and after evaluations are being implemented in the intervention and comparison districts. A cohort study component is being implemented in the intervention district to assess hypertension control. Background anthropometric and clinical data collected as part of the baseline survey were analyzed in STATA Version 11. We examined the characteristics of individuals, associated with the baseline study outcomes using logistic regression models. RESULTS: We interviewed 2400 respondents (1200 each from the comparison and intervention districts), although final sample sizes after data cleaning were 1170 participants in the comparison district and 1167 in the intervention district. With the exception of ethnicity, the control and intervention districts compare favorably. Overall 32.4% of the study respondents were hypertensive (31.4% in the control site; and 33.4% in the intervention site); 46.2% of hypertensive individuals were aware of a previous diagnosis of hypertension (44.7% in the control site, and 47.7% in the intervention site), and only around 9% of these were being treated in either arm. Hypertension control was 1.3% overall (0.5% in the comparison site, and 2.1% in the intervention site). Age was a predictor of having hypertension, and so was increasing body mass index (BMI), waist, and hip circumferences. After adjusting for age, the risk factors with the greatest association with hypertension were being overweight (aOR = 2.30; 95% CI 1.53–3.46) or obese (aOR = 3.61; 95% CI 2.37–5.51). Older individuals were more likely to be aware of their hypertension status than younger people. After adjusting for age people with a family history of hypertension or CVD, or having an unhealthy waist hip ratio, were more likely to be aware of their hypertension status. CONCLUSIONS: The high burden of hypertension among the studied population, coupled with high awareness, yet very low level of hypertension treatment and control requires in-depth investigation of the bottlenecks to treatment and control. The low hypertension treatment and control rates despite current and previous general educational programs particularly in the intervention district, may suggest that such programs are not necessarily impactful on the health of the population. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12889-017-4260-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5410035 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54100352017-05-02 Evaluation of a community-based hypertension improvement program (ComHIP) in Ghana: data from a baseline survey Lamptey, Peter Laar, Amos Adler, Alma J. Dirks, Rebecca Caldwell, Aya Prieto-Merino, David Aerts, Ann Pearce, Neil Perel, Pablo BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Ghana faces an increasing burden of non-communicable disease with rates of hypertension estimated as high as 36% in adults. Despite these high rates, hypertension control remains very poor in Ghana (4%). The current project aims to implement and evaluate a community-based programme to raise awareness, and to improve treatment and control of hypertension in the Eastern Region of Ghana. In this paper, we present the findings of the baseline cross-sectional survey focusing on hypertension prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control. METHODS: To evaluate the ComHIP project, a quasi-experimental design consisted of a before and after evaluations are being implemented in the intervention and comparison districts. A cohort study component is being implemented in the intervention district to assess hypertension control. Background anthropometric and clinical data collected as part of the baseline survey were analyzed in STATA Version 11. We examined the characteristics of individuals, associated with the baseline study outcomes using logistic regression models. RESULTS: We interviewed 2400 respondents (1200 each from the comparison and intervention districts), although final sample sizes after data cleaning were 1170 participants in the comparison district and 1167 in the intervention district. With the exception of ethnicity, the control and intervention districts compare favorably. Overall 32.4% of the study respondents were hypertensive (31.4% in the control site; and 33.4% in the intervention site); 46.2% of hypertensive individuals were aware of a previous diagnosis of hypertension (44.7% in the control site, and 47.7% in the intervention site), and only around 9% of these were being treated in either arm. Hypertension control was 1.3% overall (0.5% in the comparison site, and 2.1% in the intervention site). Age was a predictor of having hypertension, and so was increasing body mass index (BMI), waist, and hip circumferences. After adjusting for age, the risk factors with the greatest association with hypertension were being overweight (aOR = 2.30; 95% CI 1.53–3.46) or obese (aOR = 3.61; 95% CI 2.37–5.51). Older individuals were more likely to be aware of their hypertension status than younger people. After adjusting for age people with a family history of hypertension or CVD, or having an unhealthy waist hip ratio, were more likely to be aware of their hypertension status. CONCLUSIONS: The high burden of hypertension among the studied population, coupled with high awareness, yet very low level of hypertension treatment and control requires in-depth investigation of the bottlenecks to treatment and control. The low hypertension treatment and control rates despite current and previous general educational programs particularly in the intervention district, may suggest that such programs are not necessarily impactful on the health of the population. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12889-017-4260-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5410035/ /pubmed/28454523 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4260-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lamptey, Peter Laar, Amos Adler, Alma J. Dirks, Rebecca Caldwell, Aya Prieto-Merino, David Aerts, Ann Pearce, Neil Perel, Pablo Evaluation of a community-based hypertension improvement program (ComHIP) in Ghana: data from a baseline survey |
title | Evaluation of a community-based hypertension improvement program (ComHIP) in Ghana: data from a baseline survey |
title_full | Evaluation of a community-based hypertension improvement program (ComHIP) in Ghana: data from a baseline survey |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of a community-based hypertension improvement program (ComHIP) in Ghana: data from a baseline survey |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of a community-based hypertension improvement program (ComHIP) in Ghana: data from a baseline survey |
title_short | Evaluation of a community-based hypertension improvement program (ComHIP) in Ghana: data from a baseline survey |
title_sort | evaluation of a community-based hypertension improvement program (comhip) in ghana: data from a baseline survey |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5410035/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28454523 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4260-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lampteypeter evaluationofacommunitybasedhypertensionimprovementprogramcomhipinghanadatafromabaselinesurvey AT laaramos evaluationofacommunitybasedhypertensionimprovementprogramcomhipinghanadatafromabaselinesurvey AT adleralmaj evaluationofacommunitybasedhypertensionimprovementprogramcomhipinghanadatafromabaselinesurvey AT dirksrebecca evaluationofacommunitybasedhypertensionimprovementprogramcomhipinghanadatafromabaselinesurvey AT caldwellaya evaluationofacommunitybasedhypertensionimprovementprogramcomhipinghanadatafromabaselinesurvey AT prietomerinodavid evaluationofacommunitybasedhypertensionimprovementprogramcomhipinghanadatafromabaselinesurvey AT aertsann evaluationofacommunitybasedhypertensionimprovementprogramcomhipinghanadatafromabaselinesurvey AT pearceneil evaluationofacommunitybasedhypertensionimprovementprogramcomhipinghanadatafromabaselinesurvey AT perelpablo evaluationofacommunitybasedhypertensionimprovementprogramcomhipinghanadatafromabaselinesurvey |