Cargando…
Protective intraoperative ventilation with higher versus lower levels of positive end-expiratory pressure in obese patients (PROBESE): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) increase the morbidity and mortality of surgery in obese patients. High levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) with lung recruitment maneuvers may improve intraoperative respiratory function, but they can also compromise hemodynamic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5410049/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28454590 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-1929-0 |
_version_ | 1783232594920341504 |
---|---|
author | Bluth, T. Teichmann, R. Kiss, T. Bobek, I. Canet, J. Cinnella, G. De Baerdemaeker, L. Gregoretti, C. Hedenstierna, G. Hemmes, S. N. Hiesmayr, M. Hollmann, M. W. Jaber, S. Laffey, J. G. Licker, M. J. Markstaller, K. Matot, I. Müller, G. Mills, G. H. Mulier, J. P. Putensen, C. Rossaint, R. Schmitt, J. Senturk, M. Serpa Neto, A. Severgnini, P. Sprung, J. Vidal Melo, M. F. Wrigge, H. Schultz, M. J. Pelosi, P. Gama de Abreu, M. |
author_facet | Bluth, T. Teichmann, R. Kiss, T. Bobek, I. Canet, J. Cinnella, G. De Baerdemaeker, L. Gregoretti, C. Hedenstierna, G. Hemmes, S. N. Hiesmayr, M. Hollmann, M. W. Jaber, S. Laffey, J. G. Licker, M. J. Markstaller, K. Matot, I. Müller, G. Mills, G. H. Mulier, J. P. Putensen, C. Rossaint, R. Schmitt, J. Senturk, M. Serpa Neto, A. Severgnini, P. Sprung, J. Vidal Melo, M. F. Wrigge, H. Schultz, M. J. Pelosi, P. Gama de Abreu, M. |
author_sort | Bluth, T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) increase the morbidity and mortality of surgery in obese patients. High levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) with lung recruitment maneuvers may improve intraoperative respiratory function, but they can also compromise hemodynamics, and the effects on PPCs are uncertain. We hypothesized that intraoperative mechanical ventilation using high PEEP with periodic recruitment maneuvers, as compared with low PEEP without recruitment maneuvers, prevents PPCs in obese patients. METHODS/DESIGN: The PRotective Ventilation with Higher versus Lower PEEP during General Anesthesia for Surgery in OBESE Patients (PROBESE) study is a multicenter, two-arm, international randomized controlled trial. In total, 2013 obese patients with body mass index ≥35 kg/m(2) scheduled for at least 2 h of surgery under general anesthesia and at intermediate to high risk for PPCs will be included. Patients are ventilated intraoperatively with a low tidal volume of 7 ml/kg (predicted body weight) and randomly assigned to PEEP of 12 cmH(2)O with lung recruitment maneuvers (high PEEP) or PEEP of 4 cmH(2)O without recruitment maneuvers (low PEEP). The occurrence of PPCs will be recorded as collapsed composite of single adverse pulmonary events and represents the primary endpoint. DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, the PROBESE trial is the first multicenter, international randomized controlled trial to compare the effects of two different levels of intraoperative PEEP during protective low tidal volume ventilation on PPCs in obese patients. The results of the PROBESE trial will support anesthesiologists in their decision to choose a certain PEEP level during general anesthesia for surgery in obese patients in an attempt to prevent PPCs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02148692. Registered on 23 May 2014; last updated 7 June 2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-1929-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5410049 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54100492017-05-02 Protective intraoperative ventilation with higher versus lower levels of positive end-expiratory pressure in obese patients (PROBESE): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Bluth, T. Teichmann, R. Kiss, T. Bobek, I. Canet, J. Cinnella, G. De Baerdemaeker, L. Gregoretti, C. Hedenstierna, G. Hemmes, S. N. Hiesmayr, M. Hollmann, M. W. Jaber, S. Laffey, J. G. Licker, M. J. Markstaller, K. Matot, I. Müller, G. Mills, G. H. Mulier, J. P. Putensen, C. Rossaint, R. Schmitt, J. Senturk, M. Serpa Neto, A. Severgnini, P. Sprung, J. Vidal Melo, M. F. Wrigge, H. Schultz, M. J. Pelosi, P. Gama de Abreu, M. Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) increase the morbidity and mortality of surgery in obese patients. High levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) with lung recruitment maneuvers may improve intraoperative respiratory function, but they can also compromise hemodynamics, and the effects on PPCs are uncertain. We hypothesized that intraoperative mechanical ventilation using high PEEP with periodic recruitment maneuvers, as compared with low PEEP without recruitment maneuvers, prevents PPCs in obese patients. METHODS/DESIGN: The PRotective Ventilation with Higher versus Lower PEEP during General Anesthesia for Surgery in OBESE Patients (PROBESE) study is a multicenter, two-arm, international randomized controlled trial. In total, 2013 obese patients with body mass index ≥35 kg/m(2) scheduled for at least 2 h of surgery under general anesthesia and at intermediate to high risk for PPCs will be included. Patients are ventilated intraoperatively with a low tidal volume of 7 ml/kg (predicted body weight) and randomly assigned to PEEP of 12 cmH(2)O with lung recruitment maneuvers (high PEEP) or PEEP of 4 cmH(2)O without recruitment maneuvers (low PEEP). The occurrence of PPCs will be recorded as collapsed composite of single adverse pulmonary events and represents the primary endpoint. DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, the PROBESE trial is the first multicenter, international randomized controlled trial to compare the effects of two different levels of intraoperative PEEP during protective low tidal volume ventilation on PPCs in obese patients. The results of the PROBESE trial will support anesthesiologists in their decision to choose a certain PEEP level during general anesthesia for surgery in obese patients in an attempt to prevent PPCs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02148692. Registered on 23 May 2014; last updated 7 June 2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-1929-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5410049/ /pubmed/28454590 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-1929-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Bluth, T. Teichmann, R. Kiss, T. Bobek, I. Canet, J. Cinnella, G. De Baerdemaeker, L. Gregoretti, C. Hedenstierna, G. Hemmes, S. N. Hiesmayr, M. Hollmann, M. W. Jaber, S. Laffey, J. G. Licker, M. J. Markstaller, K. Matot, I. Müller, G. Mills, G. H. Mulier, J. P. Putensen, C. Rossaint, R. Schmitt, J. Senturk, M. Serpa Neto, A. Severgnini, P. Sprung, J. Vidal Melo, M. F. Wrigge, H. Schultz, M. J. Pelosi, P. Gama de Abreu, M. Protective intraoperative ventilation with higher versus lower levels of positive end-expiratory pressure in obese patients (PROBESE): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title | Protective intraoperative ventilation with higher versus lower levels of positive end-expiratory pressure in obese patients (PROBESE): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Protective intraoperative ventilation with higher versus lower levels of positive end-expiratory pressure in obese patients (PROBESE): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Protective intraoperative ventilation with higher versus lower levels of positive end-expiratory pressure in obese patients (PROBESE): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Protective intraoperative ventilation with higher versus lower levels of positive end-expiratory pressure in obese patients (PROBESE): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Protective intraoperative ventilation with higher versus lower levels of positive end-expiratory pressure in obese patients (PROBESE): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | protective intraoperative ventilation with higher versus lower levels of positive end-expiratory pressure in obese patients (probese): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5410049/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28454590 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-1929-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT blutht protectiveintraoperativeventilationwithhigherversuslowerlevelsofpositiveendexpiratorypressureinobesepatientsprobesestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT teichmannr protectiveintraoperativeventilationwithhigherversuslowerlevelsofpositiveendexpiratorypressureinobesepatientsprobesestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kisst protectiveintraoperativeventilationwithhigherversuslowerlevelsofpositiveendexpiratorypressureinobesepatientsprobesestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT bobeki protectiveintraoperativeventilationwithhigherversuslowerlevelsofpositiveendexpiratorypressureinobesepatientsprobesestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT canetj protectiveintraoperativeventilationwithhigherversuslowerlevelsofpositiveendexpiratorypressureinobesepatientsprobesestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT cinnellag protectiveintraoperativeventilationwithhigherversuslowerlevelsofpositiveendexpiratorypressureinobesepatientsprobesestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT debaerdemaekerl protectiveintraoperativeventilationwithhigherversuslowerlevelsofpositiveendexpiratorypressureinobesepatientsprobesestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT gregorettic protectiveintraoperativeventilationwithhigherversuslowerlevelsofpositiveendexpiratorypressureinobesepatientsprobesestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT hedenstiernag protectiveintraoperativeventilationwithhigherversuslowerlevelsofpositiveendexpiratorypressureinobesepatientsprobesestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT hemmessn protectiveintraoperativeventilationwithhigherversuslowerlevelsofpositiveendexpiratorypressureinobesepatientsprobesestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT hiesmayrm protectiveintraoperativeventilationwithhigherversuslowerlevelsofpositiveendexpiratorypressureinobesepatientsprobesestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT hollmannmw protectiveintraoperativeventilationwithhigherversuslowerlevelsofpositiveendexpiratorypressureinobesepatientsprobesestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT jabers protectiveintraoperativeventilationwithhigherversuslowerlevelsofpositiveendexpiratorypressureinobesepatientsprobesestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT laffeyjg protectiveintraoperativeventilationwithhigherversuslowerlevelsofpositiveendexpiratorypressureinobesepatientsprobesestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT lickermj protectiveintraoperativeventilationwithhigherversuslowerlevelsofpositiveendexpiratorypressureinobesepatientsprobesestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT markstallerk protectiveintraoperativeventilationwithhigherversuslowerlevelsofpositiveendexpiratorypressureinobesepatientsprobesestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT matoti protectiveintraoperativeventilationwithhigherversuslowerlevelsofpositiveendexpiratorypressureinobesepatientsprobesestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT mullerg protectiveintraoperativeventilationwithhigherversuslowerlevelsofpositiveendexpiratorypressureinobesepatientsprobesestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT millsgh protectiveintraoperativeventilationwithhigherversuslowerlevelsofpositiveendexpiratorypressureinobesepatientsprobesestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT mulierjp protectiveintraoperativeventilationwithhigherversuslowerlevelsofpositiveendexpiratorypressureinobesepatientsprobesestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT putensenc protectiveintraoperativeventilationwithhigherversuslowerlevelsofpositiveendexpiratorypressureinobesepatientsprobesestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT rossaintr protectiveintraoperativeventilationwithhigherversuslowerlevelsofpositiveendexpiratorypressureinobesepatientsprobesestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT schmittj protectiveintraoperativeventilationwithhigherversuslowerlevelsofpositiveendexpiratorypressureinobesepatientsprobesestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT senturkm protectiveintraoperativeventilationwithhigherversuslowerlevelsofpositiveendexpiratorypressureinobesepatientsprobesestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT serpanetoa protectiveintraoperativeventilationwithhigherversuslowerlevelsofpositiveendexpiratorypressureinobesepatientsprobesestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT severgninip protectiveintraoperativeventilationwithhigherversuslowerlevelsofpositiveendexpiratorypressureinobesepatientsprobesestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT sprungj protectiveintraoperativeventilationwithhigherversuslowerlevelsofpositiveendexpiratorypressureinobesepatientsprobesestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vidalmelomf protectiveintraoperativeventilationwithhigherversuslowerlevelsofpositiveendexpiratorypressureinobesepatientsprobesestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wriggeh protectiveintraoperativeventilationwithhigherversuslowerlevelsofpositiveendexpiratorypressureinobesepatientsprobesestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT schultzmj protectiveintraoperativeventilationwithhigherversuslowerlevelsofpositiveendexpiratorypressureinobesepatientsprobesestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT pelosip protectiveintraoperativeventilationwithhigherversuslowerlevelsofpositiveendexpiratorypressureinobesepatientsprobesestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT gamadeabreum protectiveintraoperativeventilationwithhigherversuslowerlevelsofpositiveendexpiratorypressureinobesepatientsprobesestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT protectiveintraoperativeventilationwithhigherversuslowerlevelsofpositiveendexpiratorypressureinobesepatientsprobesestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT protectiveintraoperativeventilationwithhigherversuslowerlevelsofpositiveendexpiratorypressureinobesepatientsprobesestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT protectiveintraoperativeventilationwithhigherversuslowerlevelsofpositiveendexpiratorypressureinobesepatientsprobesestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial |