Cargando…

Role of C-reactive Protein and Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha in Differentiating between Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia and Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome without Infectious Etiology

BACKGROUND: Differential diagnosis of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) with or without infectious cause is critically important in terms of initiating antimicrobial agents in case of infectious etiology such as ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). The aim of this study was to determi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Salehifar, Ebrahim, Tavakolian Arjmand, Shima, Aliyali, Masoud, Abedi, Siavash, Sharifpour, Ali, Alipour, Abbas, Ala, Shahram, Eslami, Gohar, Bozorgi, Farzad, Mahdavi, Mohammad Reza, Walley, Keith R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5410116/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28469676
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Differential diagnosis of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) with or without infectious cause is critically important in terms of initiating antimicrobial agents in case of infectious etiology such as ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic and prognostic roles of C-reactive protein (CRP) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) in differentiating between ventilator-associated pneumonia and SIRS without infectious etiology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective observational study, 91 adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients were enrolled. According to established diagnostic criteria, they were classified into three groups of “non-SIRS non-VAP”, “SIRS non-VAP” and “SIRS-VAP”. Serum CRP and TNF-α were measured on days 1, 3 and 7 of the study and compared using repeated measures ANOVA. RESULTS: With respect to diagnosis, there was no significant difference in the values of these biomarkers between groups (P>0.05). There was no statistically significant “time trend” for C-reactive protein and TNF-α (P>0.05). Considering both group effect and Time effect, the changes were not significantly different for CRP (P= 0.86) and TNF-α (P=0.69). In contrast, the clinical score and the clinical pulmonary infection score (CPIS) ≥ 6, had 100% specificity for diagnosing VAP. With respect to prognosis, only an unchanged or decreasing TNF-α from day 1 to day 3 was marginally associated with 28-day survival. However, day 1 and day 3 acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) scores were highly associated with 28-day survival. CONCLUSION: Unlike clinical scoring system including CPIS and APACHE II, TNF-α and CRP levels were not useful as diagnostic or prognostic biomarkers for differentiating between SIRS with VAP etiology and SIRS without infectious etiology.