Cargando…

Comparing the Electromyographic Features of the Masseter and Temporal Muscles in Patients with full Mouth Implant-supported FDPs and Natural Dentition

BACKGROUND: Due to increasing demands for a full mouth implant reconstructions and the fact that the most failures are associated with biomechanical complications, determining the effect of different occlusal patterns on these complications seems inevitable. The aim of this study is to compare affec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seifi, Mahdieh, Nodehi, Davood, Ghahramanloo, Ahmad, Ahmadi, Zahra, Farhangnia, Azade, Saedi, Morteza, Mozaffari, Hamid Reza, Sharifi, Roohollah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5410628/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28484298
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/aim.2017.25.49-53
_version_ 1783232722739658752
author Seifi, Mahdieh
Nodehi, Davood
Ghahramanloo, Ahmad
Ahmadi, Zahra
Farhangnia, Azade
Saedi, Morteza
Mozaffari, Hamid Reza
Sharifi, Roohollah
author_facet Seifi, Mahdieh
Nodehi, Davood
Ghahramanloo, Ahmad
Ahmadi, Zahra
Farhangnia, Azade
Saedi, Morteza
Mozaffari, Hamid Reza
Sharifi, Roohollah
author_sort Seifi, Mahdieh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Due to increasing demands for a full mouth implant reconstructions and the fact that the most failures are associated with biomechanical complications, determining the effect of different occlusal patterns on these complications seems inevitable. The aim of this study is to compare affection of different occlusal designs in full mouth implant reconstructed patients on electromyographic activity of temporal and masseter muscles compared to natural dentition. METHODS: Thirty-two patients were included in this study, considering that 16 patients had natural dentition and the other 16 were full mouth implant reconstruction patients. In both groups, the participants were divided into two subgroups: 8 patients had canine guidance occlusal pattern and the other eight had a group function occlusal pattern. Muscle contractions were studied during both maximum intercuspation and lateral excursions to the point of intercanine contact using an electromyography device. RESULTS: The average percentages of masseter muscle contraction in lateral excursions relative to maximum intercuspation were as follows: 72.20% in full mouth implant reconstruction patients with group function occlusion 69.49% in natural dentition with group function occlusion 58.85% in full mouth implant reconstruction patients with canine guidance occlusion 30.91% in natural dentition with canine guidance occlusion. The average percentages of temporal muscle contraction in lateral excursions relative to maximum intercuspation were as follows: 70.87% in full mouth implant reconstruction patients with group function occlusion 78.57% in natural dentition with group function occlusion 51.99% in full mouth implant reconstruction patients with canine guidance occlusion 31.55% in natural dentition with canine guidance occlusion. CONCLUSION: A canine guidance occlusal pattern in both, natural dentition and full mouth implant-supported FDP, patients resulted in decreased muscle contraction. This decreasing is more significant in natural dentition and it is better to establish a canine guided occlusion in a full mouth reconstruction patient.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5410628
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54106282017-05-08 Comparing the Electromyographic Features of the Masseter and Temporal Muscles in Patients with full Mouth Implant-supported FDPs and Natural Dentition Seifi, Mahdieh Nodehi, Davood Ghahramanloo, Ahmad Ahmadi, Zahra Farhangnia, Azade Saedi, Morteza Mozaffari, Hamid Reza Sharifi, Roohollah Acta Inform Med Original Paper BACKGROUND: Due to increasing demands for a full mouth implant reconstructions and the fact that the most failures are associated with biomechanical complications, determining the effect of different occlusal patterns on these complications seems inevitable. The aim of this study is to compare affection of different occlusal designs in full mouth implant reconstructed patients on electromyographic activity of temporal and masseter muscles compared to natural dentition. METHODS: Thirty-two patients were included in this study, considering that 16 patients had natural dentition and the other 16 were full mouth implant reconstruction patients. In both groups, the participants were divided into two subgroups: 8 patients had canine guidance occlusal pattern and the other eight had a group function occlusal pattern. Muscle contractions were studied during both maximum intercuspation and lateral excursions to the point of intercanine contact using an electromyography device. RESULTS: The average percentages of masseter muscle contraction in lateral excursions relative to maximum intercuspation were as follows: 72.20% in full mouth implant reconstruction patients with group function occlusion 69.49% in natural dentition with group function occlusion 58.85% in full mouth implant reconstruction patients with canine guidance occlusion 30.91% in natural dentition with canine guidance occlusion. The average percentages of temporal muscle contraction in lateral excursions relative to maximum intercuspation were as follows: 70.87% in full mouth implant reconstruction patients with group function occlusion 78.57% in natural dentition with group function occlusion 51.99% in full mouth implant reconstruction patients with canine guidance occlusion 31.55% in natural dentition with canine guidance occlusion. CONCLUSION: A canine guidance occlusal pattern in both, natural dentition and full mouth implant-supported FDP, patients resulted in decreased muscle contraction. This decreasing is more significant in natural dentition and it is better to establish a canine guided occlusion in a full mouth reconstruction patient. AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo 2017-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5410628/ /pubmed/28484298 http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/aim.2017.25.49-53 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Mahdieh Seifi, Davood Nodehi, Ahmad Ghahramanloo, Zahra Ahmadi, Azade Farhangnia, Morteza Saedi, Hamid Reza Mozaffari, Roohollah Sharifi http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Seifi, Mahdieh
Nodehi, Davood
Ghahramanloo, Ahmad
Ahmadi, Zahra
Farhangnia, Azade
Saedi, Morteza
Mozaffari, Hamid Reza
Sharifi, Roohollah
Comparing the Electromyographic Features of the Masseter and Temporal Muscles in Patients with full Mouth Implant-supported FDPs and Natural Dentition
title Comparing the Electromyographic Features of the Masseter and Temporal Muscles in Patients with full Mouth Implant-supported FDPs and Natural Dentition
title_full Comparing the Electromyographic Features of the Masseter and Temporal Muscles in Patients with full Mouth Implant-supported FDPs and Natural Dentition
title_fullStr Comparing the Electromyographic Features of the Masseter and Temporal Muscles in Patients with full Mouth Implant-supported FDPs and Natural Dentition
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the Electromyographic Features of the Masseter and Temporal Muscles in Patients with full Mouth Implant-supported FDPs and Natural Dentition
title_short Comparing the Electromyographic Features of the Masseter and Temporal Muscles in Patients with full Mouth Implant-supported FDPs and Natural Dentition
title_sort comparing the electromyographic features of the masseter and temporal muscles in patients with full mouth implant-supported fdps and natural dentition
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5410628/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28484298
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/aim.2017.25.49-53
work_keys_str_mv AT seifimahdieh comparingtheelectromyographicfeaturesofthemasseterandtemporalmusclesinpatientswithfullmouthimplantsupportedfdpsandnaturaldentition
AT nodehidavood comparingtheelectromyographicfeaturesofthemasseterandtemporalmusclesinpatientswithfullmouthimplantsupportedfdpsandnaturaldentition
AT ghahramanlooahmad comparingtheelectromyographicfeaturesofthemasseterandtemporalmusclesinpatientswithfullmouthimplantsupportedfdpsandnaturaldentition
AT ahmadizahra comparingtheelectromyographicfeaturesofthemasseterandtemporalmusclesinpatientswithfullmouthimplantsupportedfdpsandnaturaldentition
AT farhangniaazade comparingtheelectromyographicfeaturesofthemasseterandtemporalmusclesinpatientswithfullmouthimplantsupportedfdpsandnaturaldentition
AT saedimorteza comparingtheelectromyographicfeaturesofthemasseterandtemporalmusclesinpatientswithfullmouthimplantsupportedfdpsandnaturaldentition
AT mozaffarihamidreza comparingtheelectromyographicfeaturesofthemasseterandtemporalmusclesinpatientswithfullmouthimplantsupportedfdpsandnaturaldentition
AT sharifiroohollah comparingtheelectromyographicfeaturesofthemasseterandtemporalmusclesinpatientswithfullmouthimplantsupportedfdpsandnaturaldentition