Cargando…

Evaluation of Bioequivalence of Two Long-Acting 20% Oxytetracycline Formulations in Pigs

The aim of this study was to explore the bioequivalence of long-acting oxytetracycline in two formulations, a reference formulation (Terramycin 20% LA, Pfizer) and a test one (Kangtekang 20% LA, Huishen). Both formulations were administered intramuscularly at 20 mg/kg body weight at each of 24 healt...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lei, Zhixin, Liu, Qianying, Yang, Bing, Ahmed, Saeed, Xiong, Jincheng, Song, Tingting, Chen, Pin, Cao, Jiyue, He, Qigai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5410648/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28507991
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2017.00061
_version_ 1783232724543209472
author Lei, Zhixin
Liu, Qianying
Yang, Bing
Ahmed, Saeed
Xiong, Jincheng
Song, Tingting
Chen, Pin
Cao, Jiyue
He, Qigai
author_facet Lei, Zhixin
Liu, Qianying
Yang, Bing
Ahmed, Saeed
Xiong, Jincheng
Song, Tingting
Chen, Pin
Cao, Jiyue
He, Qigai
author_sort Lei, Zhixin
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to explore the bioequivalence of long-acting oxytetracycline in two formulations, a reference formulation (Terramycin 20% LA, Pfizer) and a test one (Kangtekang 20% LA, Huishen). Both formulations were administered intramuscularly at 20 mg/kg body weight at each of 24 healthy animals during a two-period crossover parallel experimental design. The oxytetracycline (OTC) concentrations in plasma were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography, and the limit of quantification was 0.05 µg/ml with a recovery ratio of above 90%. Moreover, the descriptive pharmacokinetics parameters (C(max), AUC(0–144h), and AUC(0–∞)) were calculated and compared under analysis of variance, and 90% confidence interval (CI) were compared, except for T(max) analyzed by non-parametric tests based on Wilcoxons’s signed rank test. The comparison results of C(max), AUC(0–144h), AUC(0–∞), and T(max) were 5.066 ± 0.486, 5.071 ± 0.877 µg/ml, 118.926 ± 13.259, 126.179 ± 17.390 µg h/ml, 123.087 ± 13.906, 130.732 ± 18.562 µg h/ml, 0.740 ± 0.278, 0.650 ± 0.258 h, respectively, and did not reveal any significant differences. In addition, 90% CIs of these ratios for reference and test product were within an interval of 80–125%, and the relative bioavailability of test one was (94.291 ± 15.287)%. Therefore, it has been concluded that test OTC was bioequivalent to the reference formulation in pigs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5410648
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54106482017-05-15 Evaluation of Bioequivalence of Two Long-Acting 20% Oxytetracycline Formulations in Pigs Lei, Zhixin Liu, Qianying Yang, Bing Ahmed, Saeed Xiong, Jincheng Song, Tingting Chen, Pin Cao, Jiyue He, Qigai Front Vet Sci Veterinary Science The aim of this study was to explore the bioequivalence of long-acting oxytetracycline in two formulations, a reference formulation (Terramycin 20% LA, Pfizer) and a test one (Kangtekang 20% LA, Huishen). Both formulations were administered intramuscularly at 20 mg/kg body weight at each of 24 healthy animals during a two-period crossover parallel experimental design. The oxytetracycline (OTC) concentrations in plasma were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography, and the limit of quantification was 0.05 µg/ml with a recovery ratio of above 90%. Moreover, the descriptive pharmacokinetics parameters (C(max), AUC(0–144h), and AUC(0–∞)) were calculated and compared under analysis of variance, and 90% confidence interval (CI) were compared, except for T(max) analyzed by non-parametric tests based on Wilcoxons’s signed rank test. The comparison results of C(max), AUC(0–144h), AUC(0–∞), and T(max) were 5.066 ± 0.486, 5.071 ± 0.877 µg/ml, 118.926 ± 13.259, 126.179 ± 17.390 µg h/ml, 123.087 ± 13.906, 130.732 ± 18.562 µg h/ml, 0.740 ± 0.278, 0.650 ± 0.258 h, respectively, and did not reveal any significant differences. In addition, 90% CIs of these ratios for reference and test product were within an interval of 80–125%, and the relative bioavailability of test one was (94.291 ± 15.287)%. Therefore, it has been concluded that test OTC was bioequivalent to the reference formulation in pigs. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5410648/ /pubmed/28507991 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2017.00061 Text en Copyright © 2017 Lei, Liu, Yang, Ahmed, Xiong, Song, Chen, Cao and He. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Veterinary Science
Lei, Zhixin
Liu, Qianying
Yang, Bing
Ahmed, Saeed
Xiong, Jincheng
Song, Tingting
Chen, Pin
Cao, Jiyue
He, Qigai
Evaluation of Bioequivalence of Two Long-Acting 20% Oxytetracycline Formulations in Pigs
title Evaluation of Bioequivalence of Two Long-Acting 20% Oxytetracycline Formulations in Pigs
title_full Evaluation of Bioequivalence of Two Long-Acting 20% Oxytetracycline Formulations in Pigs
title_fullStr Evaluation of Bioequivalence of Two Long-Acting 20% Oxytetracycline Formulations in Pigs
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Bioequivalence of Two Long-Acting 20% Oxytetracycline Formulations in Pigs
title_short Evaluation of Bioequivalence of Two Long-Acting 20% Oxytetracycline Formulations in Pigs
title_sort evaluation of bioequivalence of two long-acting 20% oxytetracycline formulations in pigs
topic Veterinary Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5410648/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28507991
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2017.00061
work_keys_str_mv AT leizhixin evaluationofbioequivalenceoftwolongacting20oxytetracyclineformulationsinpigs
AT liuqianying evaluationofbioequivalenceoftwolongacting20oxytetracyclineformulationsinpigs
AT yangbing evaluationofbioequivalenceoftwolongacting20oxytetracyclineformulationsinpigs
AT ahmedsaeed evaluationofbioequivalenceoftwolongacting20oxytetracyclineformulationsinpigs
AT xiongjincheng evaluationofbioequivalenceoftwolongacting20oxytetracyclineformulationsinpigs
AT songtingting evaluationofbioequivalenceoftwolongacting20oxytetracyclineformulationsinpigs
AT chenpin evaluationofbioequivalenceoftwolongacting20oxytetracyclineformulationsinpigs
AT caojiyue evaluationofbioequivalenceoftwolongacting20oxytetracyclineformulationsinpigs
AT heqigai evaluationofbioequivalenceoftwolongacting20oxytetracyclineformulationsinpigs