Cargando…
Evaluation of Bioequivalence of Two Long-Acting 20% Oxytetracycline Formulations in Pigs
The aim of this study was to explore the bioequivalence of long-acting oxytetracycline in two formulations, a reference formulation (Terramycin 20% LA, Pfizer) and a test one (Kangtekang 20% LA, Huishen). Both formulations were administered intramuscularly at 20 mg/kg body weight at each of 24 healt...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5410648/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28507991 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2017.00061 |
_version_ | 1783232724543209472 |
---|---|
author | Lei, Zhixin Liu, Qianying Yang, Bing Ahmed, Saeed Xiong, Jincheng Song, Tingting Chen, Pin Cao, Jiyue He, Qigai |
author_facet | Lei, Zhixin Liu, Qianying Yang, Bing Ahmed, Saeed Xiong, Jincheng Song, Tingting Chen, Pin Cao, Jiyue He, Qigai |
author_sort | Lei, Zhixin |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of this study was to explore the bioequivalence of long-acting oxytetracycline in two formulations, a reference formulation (Terramycin 20% LA, Pfizer) and a test one (Kangtekang 20% LA, Huishen). Both formulations were administered intramuscularly at 20 mg/kg body weight at each of 24 healthy animals during a two-period crossover parallel experimental design. The oxytetracycline (OTC) concentrations in plasma were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography, and the limit of quantification was 0.05 µg/ml with a recovery ratio of above 90%. Moreover, the descriptive pharmacokinetics parameters (C(max), AUC(0–144h), and AUC(0–∞)) were calculated and compared under analysis of variance, and 90% confidence interval (CI) were compared, except for T(max) analyzed by non-parametric tests based on Wilcoxons’s signed rank test. The comparison results of C(max), AUC(0–144h), AUC(0–∞), and T(max) were 5.066 ± 0.486, 5.071 ± 0.877 µg/ml, 118.926 ± 13.259, 126.179 ± 17.390 µg h/ml, 123.087 ± 13.906, 130.732 ± 18.562 µg h/ml, 0.740 ± 0.278, 0.650 ± 0.258 h, respectively, and did not reveal any significant differences. In addition, 90% CIs of these ratios for reference and test product were within an interval of 80–125%, and the relative bioavailability of test one was (94.291 ± 15.287)%. Therefore, it has been concluded that test OTC was bioequivalent to the reference formulation in pigs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5410648 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54106482017-05-15 Evaluation of Bioequivalence of Two Long-Acting 20% Oxytetracycline Formulations in Pigs Lei, Zhixin Liu, Qianying Yang, Bing Ahmed, Saeed Xiong, Jincheng Song, Tingting Chen, Pin Cao, Jiyue He, Qigai Front Vet Sci Veterinary Science The aim of this study was to explore the bioequivalence of long-acting oxytetracycline in two formulations, a reference formulation (Terramycin 20% LA, Pfizer) and a test one (Kangtekang 20% LA, Huishen). Both formulations were administered intramuscularly at 20 mg/kg body weight at each of 24 healthy animals during a two-period crossover parallel experimental design. The oxytetracycline (OTC) concentrations in plasma were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography, and the limit of quantification was 0.05 µg/ml with a recovery ratio of above 90%. Moreover, the descriptive pharmacokinetics parameters (C(max), AUC(0–144h), and AUC(0–∞)) were calculated and compared under analysis of variance, and 90% confidence interval (CI) were compared, except for T(max) analyzed by non-parametric tests based on Wilcoxons’s signed rank test. The comparison results of C(max), AUC(0–144h), AUC(0–∞), and T(max) were 5.066 ± 0.486, 5.071 ± 0.877 µg/ml, 118.926 ± 13.259, 126.179 ± 17.390 µg h/ml, 123.087 ± 13.906, 130.732 ± 18.562 µg h/ml, 0.740 ± 0.278, 0.650 ± 0.258 h, respectively, and did not reveal any significant differences. In addition, 90% CIs of these ratios for reference and test product were within an interval of 80–125%, and the relative bioavailability of test one was (94.291 ± 15.287)%. Therefore, it has been concluded that test OTC was bioequivalent to the reference formulation in pigs. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5410648/ /pubmed/28507991 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2017.00061 Text en Copyright © 2017 Lei, Liu, Yang, Ahmed, Xiong, Song, Chen, Cao and He. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Veterinary Science Lei, Zhixin Liu, Qianying Yang, Bing Ahmed, Saeed Xiong, Jincheng Song, Tingting Chen, Pin Cao, Jiyue He, Qigai Evaluation of Bioequivalence of Two Long-Acting 20% Oxytetracycline Formulations in Pigs |
title | Evaluation of Bioequivalence of Two Long-Acting 20% Oxytetracycline Formulations in Pigs |
title_full | Evaluation of Bioequivalence of Two Long-Acting 20% Oxytetracycline Formulations in Pigs |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Bioequivalence of Two Long-Acting 20% Oxytetracycline Formulations in Pigs |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Bioequivalence of Two Long-Acting 20% Oxytetracycline Formulations in Pigs |
title_short | Evaluation of Bioequivalence of Two Long-Acting 20% Oxytetracycline Formulations in Pigs |
title_sort | evaluation of bioequivalence of two long-acting 20% oxytetracycline formulations in pigs |
topic | Veterinary Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5410648/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28507991 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2017.00061 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leizhixin evaluationofbioequivalenceoftwolongacting20oxytetracyclineformulationsinpigs AT liuqianying evaluationofbioequivalenceoftwolongacting20oxytetracyclineformulationsinpigs AT yangbing evaluationofbioequivalenceoftwolongacting20oxytetracyclineformulationsinpigs AT ahmedsaeed evaluationofbioequivalenceoftwolongacting20oxytetracyclineformulationsinpigs AT xiongjincheng evaluationofbioequivalenceoftwolongacting20oxytetracyclineformulationsinpigs AT songtingting evaluationofbioequivalenceoftwolongacting20oxytetracyclineformulationsinpigs AT chenpin evaluationofbioequivalenceoftwolongacting20oxytetracyclineformulationsinpigs AT caojiyue evaluationofbioequivalenceoftwolongacting20oxytetracyclineformulationsinpigs AT heqigai evaluationofbioequivalenceoftwolongacting20oxytetracyclineformulationsinpigs |