Cargando…
Reparability of giomer using different mechanical surface treatments
BACKGROUND: In the repair process achieving high bond strength between the new and old resin based materials is necessary for clinical longevity. This study compared the effect of three different mechanical surface treatments (air abrasion, Nd:YAG laser and diamond bur) on the repair bond strength o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medicina Oral S.L.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5410671/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28469816 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.53591 |
_version_ | 1783232728914722816 |
---|---|
author | Arami, Saba Kimyai, Soodabeh Oskoee, Parnian-Alizadeh Daneshpooy, Mehdi Rikhtegaran, Sahand Bahari, Mahmoud Kahnamoii, Mehdi-Abed |
author_facet | Arami, Saba Kimyai, Soodabeh Oskoee, Parnian-Alizadeh Daneshpooy, Mehdi Rikhtegaran, Sahand Bahari, Mahmoud Kahnamoii, Mehdi-Abed |
author_sort | Arami, Saba |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In the repair process achieving high bond strength between the new and old resin based materials is necessary for clinical longevity. This study compared the effect of three different mechanical surface treatments (air abrasion, Nd:YAG laser and diamond bur) on the repair bond strength of giomer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this in vitrostudy, 125 cylindrical giomer samples were used. The giomer samples were randomly assigned to 5 groups (n=25). In group 1, the samples did not undergo any surface treatment. In groups 2 to 4, the samples underwent surface treatments with air abrasion, Nd:YAG laser and a diamond bur. The samples in group 5 were prepared to measure giomer cohesive strength. Subsequently, the new giomer was bonded to the existing giomer in groups 1 to 4. Then the repair bond strength of the samples was measured. One-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey test were used to compare the bond strength. RESULTS: There were significant differences between the different surface treatments (P<0.001); the repair bond strength in the air abrasion group was significantly higher than that in the Nd:YAG laser group, in which it was significantly higher than that in the diamond bur group, which was in turn higher than that in group 1 (no surface treatment) (P<0.001). In addition, the cohesive strength of giomer was significantly higher than the repair bond strength in the 4 other study groups (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Of all the surface treatments, air abrasion and Nd:YAG laser, in descending order, yielded the highest repair bond strength values, with the repair bond strength values of 60‒70% of the giomer cohesive strength. Key words:Air abrasion, bond strength, giomer, Nd:YAG laser, repair, surface treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5410671 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Medicina Oral S.L. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54106712017-05-03 Reparability of giomer using different mechanical surface treatments Arami, Saba Kimyai, Soodabeh Oskoee, Parnian-Alizadeh Daneshpooy, Mehdi Rikhtegaran, Sahand Bahari, Mahmoud Kahnamoii, Mehdi-Abed J Clin Exp Dent Research BACKGROUND: In the repair process achieving high bond strength between the new and old resin based materials is necessary for clinical longevity. This study compared the effect of three different mechanical surface treatments (air abrasion, Nd:YAG laser and diamond bur) on the repair bond strength of giomer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this in vitrostudy, 125 cylindrical giomer samples were used. The giomer samples were randomly assigned to 5 groups (n=25). In group 1, the samples did not undergo any surface treatment. In groups 2 to 4, the samples underwent surface treatments with air abrasion, Nd:YAG laser and a diamond bur. The samples in group 5 were prepared to measure giomer cohesive strength. Subsequently, the new giomer was bonded to the existing giomer in groups 1 to 4. Then the repair bond strength of the samples was measured. One-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey test were used to compare the bond strength. RESULTS: There were significant differences between the different surface treatments (P<0.001); the repair bond strength in the air abrasion group was significantly higher than that in the Nd:YAG laser group, in which it was significantly higher than that in the diamond bur group, which was in turn higher than that in group 1 (no surface treatment) (P<0.001). In addition, the cohesive strength of giomer was significantly higher than the repair bond strength in the 4 other study groups (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Of all the surface treatments, air abrasion and Nd:YAG laser, in descending order, yielded the highest repair bond strength values, with the repair bond strength values of 60‒70% of the giomer cohesive strength. Key words:Air abrasion, bond strength, giomer, Nd:YAG laser, repair, surface treatment. Medicina Oral S.L. 2017-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5410671/ /pubmed/28469816 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.53591 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Medicina Oral S.L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Arami, Saba Kimyai, Soodabeh Oskoee, Parnian-Alizadeh Daneshpooy, Mehdi Rikhtegaran, Sahand Bahari, Mahmoud Kahnamoii, Mehdi-Abed Reparability of giomer using different mechanical surface treatments |
title | Reparability of giomer using different mechanical surface treatments |
title_full | Reparability of giomer using different mechanical surface treatments |
title_fullStr | Reparability of giomer using different mechanical surface treatments |
title_full_unstemmed | Reparability of giomer using different mechanical surface treatments |
title_short | Reparability of giomer using different mechanical surface treatments |
title_sort | reparability of giomer using different mechanical surface treatments |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5410671/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28469816 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.53591 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aramisaba reparabilityofgiomerusingdifferentmechanicalsurfacetreatments AT kimyaisoodabeh reparabilityofgiomerusingdifferentmechanicalsurfacetreatments AT oskoeeparnianalizadeh reparabilityofgiomerusingdifferentmechanicalsurfacetreatments AT daneshpooymehdi reparabilityofgiomerusingdifferentmechanicalsurfacetreatments AT rikhtegaransahand reparabilityofgiomerusingdifferentmechanicalsurfacetreatments AT baharimahmoud reparabilityofgiomerusingdifferentmechanicalsurfacetreatments AT kahnamoiimehdiabed reparabilityofgiomerusingdifferentmechanicalsurfacetreatments |