Cargando…

Reparability of giomer using different mechanical surface treatments

BACKGROUND: In the repair process achieving high bond strength between the new and old resin based materials is necessary for clinical longevity. This study compared the effect of three different mechanical surface treatments (air abrasion, Nd:YAG laser and diamond bur) on the repair bond strength o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arami, Saba, Kimyai, Soodabeh, Oskoee, Parnian-Alizadeh, Daneshpooy, Mehdi, Rikhtegaran, Sahand, Bahari, Mahmoud, Kahnamoii, Mehdi-Abed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medicina Oral S.L. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5410671/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28469816
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.53591
_version_ 1783232728914722816
author Arami, Saba
Kimyai, Soodabeh
Oskoee, Parnian-Alizadeh
Daneshpooy, Mehdi
Rikhtegaran, Sahand
Bahari, Mahmoud
Kahnamoii, Mehdi-Abed
author_facet Arami, Saba
Kimyai, Soodabeh
Oskoee, Parnian-Alizadeh
Daneshpooy, Mehdi
Rikhtegaran, Sahand
Bahari, Mahmoud
Kahnamoii, Mehdi-Abed
author_sort Arami, Saba
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In the repair process achieving high bond strength between the new and old resin based materials is necessary for clinical longevity. This study compared the effect of three different mechanical surface treatments (air abrasion, Nd:YAG laser and diamond bur) on the repair bond strength of giomer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this in vitrostudy, 125 cylindrical giomer samples were used. The giomer samples were randomly assigned to 5 groups (n=25). In group 1, the samples did not undergo any surface treatment. In groups 2 to 4, the samples underwent surface treatments with air abrasion, Nd:YAG laser and a diamond bur. The samples in group 5 were prepared to measure giomer cohesive strength. Subsequently, the new giomer was bonded to the existing giomer in groups 1 to 4. Then the repair bond strength of the samples was measured. One-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey test were used to compare the bond strength. RESULTS: There were significant differences between the different surface treatments (P<0.001); the repair bond strength in the air abrasion group was significantly higher than that in the Nd:YAG laser group, in which it was significantly higher than that in the diamond bur group, which was in turn higher than that in group 1 (no surface treatment) (P<0.001). In addition, the cohesive strength of giomer was significantly higher than the repair bond strength in the 4 other study groups (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Of all the surface treatments, air abrasion and Nd:YAG laser, in descending order, yielded the highest repair bond strength values, with the repair bond strength values of 60‒70% of the giomer cohesive strength. Key words:Air abrasion, bond strength, giomer, Nd:YAG laser, repair, surface treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5410671
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medicina Oral S.L.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54106712017-05-03 Reparability of giomer using different mechanical surface treatments Arami, Saba Kimyai, Soodabeh Oskoee, Parnian-Alizadeh Daneshpooy, Mehdi Rikhtegaran, Sahand Bahari, Mahmoud Kahnamoii, Mehdi-Abed J Clin Exp Dent Research BACKGROUND: In the repair process achieving high bond strength between the new and old resin based materials is necessary for clinical longevity. This study compared the effect of three different mechanical surface treatments (air abrasion, Nd:YAG laser and diamond bur) on the repair bond strength of giomer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this in vitrostudy, 125 cylindrical giomer samples were used. The giomer samples were randomly assigned to 5 groups (n=25). In group 1, the samples did not undergo any surface treatment. In groups 2 to 4, the samples underwent surface treatments with air abrasion, Nd:YAG laser and a diamond bur. The samples in group 5 were prepared to measure giomer cohesive strength. Subsequently, the new giomer was bonded to the existing giomer in groups 1 to 4. Then the repair bond strength of the samples was measured. One-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey test were used to compare the bond strength. RESULTS: There were significant differences between the different surface treatments (P<0.001); the repair bond strength in the air abrasion group was significantly higher than that in the Nd:YAG laser group, in which it was significantly higher than that in the diamond bur group, which was in turn higher than that in group 1 (no surface treatment) (P<0.001). In addition, the cohesive strength of giomer was significantly higher than the repair bond strength in the 4 other study groups (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Of all the surface treatments, air abrasion and Nd:YAG laser, in descending order, yielded the highest repair bond strength values, with the repair bond strength values of 60‒70% of the giomer cohesive strength. Key words:Air abrasion, bond strength, giomer, Nd:YAG laser, repair, surface treatment. Medicina Oral S.L. 2017-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5410671/ /pubmed/28469816 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.53591 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Medicina Oral S.L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Arami, Saba
Kimyai, Soodabeh
Oskoee, Parnian-Alizadeh
Daneshpooy, Mehdi
Rikhtegaran, Sahand
Bahari, Mahmoud
Kahnamoii, Mehdi-Abed
Reparability of giomer using different mechanical surface treatments
title Reparability of giomer using different mechanical surface treatments
title_full Reparability of giomer using different mechanical surface treatments
title_fullStr Reparability of giomer using different mechanical surface treatments
title_full_unstemmed Reparability of giomer using different mechanical surface treatments
title_short Reparability of giomer using different mechanical surface treatments
title_sort reparability of giomer using different mechanical surface treatments
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5410671/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28469816
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.53591
work_keys_str_mv AT aramisaba reparabilityofgiomerusingdifferentmechanicalsurfacetreatments
AT kimyaisoodabeh reparabilityofgiomerusingdifferentmechanicalsurfacetreatments
AT oskoeeparnianalizadeh reparabilityofgiomerusingdifferentmechanicalsurfacetreatments
AT daneshpooymehdi reparabilityofgiomerusingdifferentmechanicalsurfacetreatments
AT rikhtegaransahand reparabilityofgiomerusingdifferentmechanicalsurfacetreatments
AT baharimahmoud reparabilityofgiomerusingdifferentmechanicalsurfacetreatments
AT kahnamoiimehdiabed reparabilityofgiomerusingdifferentmechanicalsurfacetreatments