Cargando…
The comparison of modified semilunar technique in conjunction with connective tissue and subepithelial connective tissue graft for root coverage: a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Gingival recession may result in aesthetically unfavourable effects, difficulty in plaque control, increased susceptibility to root caries, and dentin hypersensitivity. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the use of modified semilunar techniques with connective tissue and sub...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Electronic physician
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5410894/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28465795 http://dx.doi.org/10.19082/3699 |
_version_ | 1783232754389876736 |
---|---|
author | Jenabian, Niloofar Khanjani, Nafiseh Bijani, Ali |
author_facet | Jenabian, Niloofar Khanjani, Nafiseh Bijani, Ali |
author_sort | Jenabian, Niloofar |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Gingival recession may result in aesthetically unfavourable effects, difficulty in plaque control, increased susceptibility to root caries, and dentin hypersensitivity. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the use of modified semilunar techniques with connective tissue and subepithelial connective tissue grafts (Langer) for denuded root surface coverage. METHODS: In this randomized clinical trial, fourteen localized recessions of Miller class I to II were treated in 5 subjects. Recessions were randomly treated with modified semilunar techniques (test group) and a subepithelial connective tissue graft (control group). Clinical parameters such as clinical attachment level (CAL), keratinized tissue width (KTW), probing pocket depth (PPD), vertical recession depth (VRD) and recession width (RW)were recorded at base line, 1, 3 and 6 months after surgery and healing index and the subject’s satisfaction was evaluated. The repeated measure test and paired-sample t-test were used for statistical analyses by SPSS. RESULTS: Both methods showed significant improvement in clinical parameters. The healing index (HI) in the test group was a slightly more than the control group in Day 10. Aesthetic VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) levels in the test group were more than the control group in 1, 3 and 6 months (test group, in 1 month 6.57±1.13, in 3 month 7.86±1.07, in 6 month 8.00±0.81. control group in 1 month 5.57±1.13, in 3 month 7.00±1.00, in 6 month 7.14±0.90). The KTW, CAL, VRD and RW level’s difference in the test and control group was significant in 6 month compared to the base line (p=0.000). CONCLUSIONS: The present study shows that treatment of Miller Class I and II gingival recession by the modified semilunar technique is acceptable. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered at the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (http://www.irct.ir) with the Irct ID: IRCT201512021760N43. Date registered: December 27, 2015. FUNDING: The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5410894 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Electronic physician |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54108942017-05-02 The comparison of modified semilunar technique in conjunction with connective tissue and subepithelial connective tissue graft for root coverage: a randomized controlled trial Jenabian, Niloofar Khanjani, Nafiseh Bijani, Ali Electron Physician Original Article BACKGROUND: Gingival recession may result in aesthetically unfavourable effects, difficulty in plaque control, increased susceptibility to root caries, and dentin hypersensitivity. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the use of modified semilunar techniques with connective tissue and subepithelial connective tissue grafts (Langer) for denuded root surface coverage. METHODS: In this randomized clinical trial, fourteen localized recessions of Miller class I to II were treated in 5 subjects. Recessions were randomly treated with modified semilunar techniques (test group) and a subepithelial connective tissue graft (control group). Clinical parameters such as clinical attachment level (CAL), keratinized tissue width (KTW), probing pocket depth (PPD), vertical recession depth (VRD) and recession width (RW)were recorded at base line, 1, 3 and 6 months after surgery and healing index and the subject’s satisfaction was evaluated. The repeated measure test and paired-sample t-test were used for statistical analyses by SPSS. RESULTS: Both methods showed significant improvement in clinical parameters. The healing index (HI) in the test group was a slightly more than the control group in Day 10. Aesthetic VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) levels in the test group were more than the control group in 1, 3 and 6 months (test group, in 1 month 6.57±1.13, in 3 month 7.86±1.07, in 6 month 8.00±0.81. control group in 1 month 5.57±1.13, in 3 month 7.00±1.00, in 6 month 7.14±0.90). The KTW, CAL, VRD and RW level’s difference in the test and control group was significant in 6 month compared to the base line (p=0.000). CONCLUSIONS: The present study shows that treatment of Miller Class I and II gingival recession by the modified semilunar technique is acceptable. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered at the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (http://www.irct.ir) with the Irct ID: IRCT201512021760N43. Date registered: December 27, 2015. FUNDING: The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Electronic physician 2017-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5410894/ /pubmed/28465795 http://dx.doi.org/10.19082/3699 Text en © 2017 The Authors This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/) , which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Jenabian, Niloofar Khanjani, Nafiseh Bijani, Ali The comparison of modified semilunar technique in conjunction with connective tissue and subepithelial connective tissue graft for root coverage: a randomized controlled trial |
title | The comparison of modified semilunar technique in conjunction with connective tissue and subepithelial connective tissue graft for root coverage: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | The comparison of modified semilunar technique in conjunction with connective tissue and subepithelial connective tissue graft for root coverage: a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | The comparison of modified semilunar technique in conjunction with connective tissue and subepithelial connective tissue graft for root coverage: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | The comparison of modified semilunar technique in conjunction with connective tissue and subepithelial connective tissue graft for root coverage: a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | The comparison of modified semilunar technique in conjunction with connective tissue and subepithelial connective tissue graft for root coverage: a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | comparison of modified semilunar technique in conjunction with connective tissue and subepithelial connective tissue graft for root coverage: a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5410894/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28465795 http://dx.doi.org/10.19082/3699 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jenabianniloofar thecomparisonofmodifiedsemilunartechniqueinconjunctionwithconnectivetissueandsubepithelialconnectivetissuegraftforrootcoveragearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT khanjaninafiseh thecomparisonofmodifiedsemilunartechniqueinconjunctionwithconnectivetissueandsubepithelialconnectivetissuegraftforrootcoveragearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT bijaniali thecomparisonofmodifiedsemilunartechniqueinconjunctionwithconnectivetissueandsubepithelialconnectivetissuegraftforrootcoveragearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT jenabianniloofar comparisonofmodifiedsemilunartechniqueinconjunctionwithconnectivetissueandsubepithelialconnectivetissuegraftforrootcoveragearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT khanjaninafiseh comparisonofmodifiedsemilunartechniqueinconjunctionwithconnectivetissueandsubepithelialconnectivetissuegraftforrootcoveragearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT bijaniali comparisonofmodifiedsemilunartechniqueinconjunctionwithconnectivetissueandsubepithelialconnectivetissuegraftforrootcoveragearandomizedcontrolledtrial |