Cargando…

Influence of rendering methods on yield and quality of chicken fat recovered from broiler skin

OBJECTIVE: In order to utilize fat from broiler byproducts efficiently, it is necessary to develop an appropriate rendering procedure and establish quality information for the rendered fat. A study was therefore undertaken to evaluate the influence of rendering methods on the amounts and general pro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Liang-Kun, Tan, Fa-Jui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (AAAP) and Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology (KSAST) 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5411852/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27739292
http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.16.0434
_version_ 1783232876931710976
author Lin, Liang-Kun
Tan, Fa-Jui
author_facet Lin, Liang-Kun
Tan, Fa-Jui
author_sort Lin, Liang-Kun
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: In order to utilize fat from broiler byproducts efficiently, it is necessary to develop an appropriate rendering procedure and establish quality information for the rendered fat. A study was therefore undertaken to evaluate the influence of rendering methods on the amounts and general properties of the fat recovered from broiler skin. METHODS: The yield and quality of the broiler skin fat rendered through high and lower energy microwave rendering (3.6 W/g for 10 min and 2.4 W/g for 10 min for high power microwave rendering (HPMR) and high power microwave rendering (LPMR), respectively), oven baking (OB, at 180°C for 40 min), and water cooking (WC, boiling for 40 min) were compared. RESULTS: Microwave-rendered skin exhibited the highest yields and fat recovery rates, followed by OB, and WC fats (p<0.05). HPMR fat had the highest L*, a*, and b* values, whereas WC fat had the highest moisture content, acid values, and thiobarbituric acid (TBA) values (p<0.05). There was no significant difference in the acid value, peroxide value, and TBA values between HPMR and LPMR fats. CONCLUSION: Microwave rendering at a power level of 3.6 W/g for 10 min is suggested base on the yield and quality of chicken fat.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5411852
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (AAAP) and Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology (KSAST)
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54118522017-06-01 Influence of rendering methods on yield and quality of chicken fat recovered from broiler skin Lin, Liang-Kun Tan, Fa-Jui Asian-Australas J Anim Sci Article OBJECTIVE: In order to utilize fat from broiler byproducts efficiently, it is necessary to develop an appropriate rendering procedure and establish quality information for the rendered fat. A study was therefore undertaken to evaluate the influence of rendering methods on the amounts and general properties of the fat recovered from broiler skin. METHODS: The yield and quality of the broiler skin fat rendered through high and lower energy microwave rendering (3.6 W/g for 10 min and 2.4 W/g for 10 min for high power microwave rendering (HPMR) and high power microwave rendering (LPMR), respectively), oven baking (OB, at 180°C for 40 min), and water cooking (WC, boiling for 40 min) were compared. RESULTS: Microwave-rendered skin exhibited the highest yields and fat recovery rates, followed by OB, and WC fats (p<0.05). HPMR fat had the highest L*, a*, and b* values, whereas WC fat had the highest moisture content, acid values, and thiobarbituric acid (TBA) values (p<0.05). There was no significant difference in the acid value, peroxide value, and TBA values between HPMR and LPMR fats. CONCLUSION: Microwave rendering at a power level of 3.6 W/g for 10 min is suggested base on the yield and quality of chicken fat. Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (AAAP) and Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology (KSAST) 2017-06 2016-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5411852/ /pubmed/27739292 http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.16.0434 Text en Copyright © 2017 by Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Lin, Liang-Kun
Tan, Fa-Jui
Influence of rendering methods on yield and quality of chicken fat recovered from broiler skin
title Influence of rendering methods on yield and quality of chicken fat recovered from broiler skin
title_full Influence of rendering methods on yield and quality of chicken fat recovered from broiler skin
title_fullStr Influence of rendering methods on yield and quality of chicken fat recovered from broiler skin
title_full_unstemmed Influence of rendering methods on yield and quality of chicken fat recovered from broiler skin
title_short Influence of rendering methods on yield and quality of chicken fat recovered from broiler skin
title_sort influence of rendering methods on yield and quality of chicken fat recovered from broiler skin
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5411852/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27739292
http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.16.0434
work_keys_str_mv AT linliangkun influenceofrenderingmethodsonyieldandqualityofchickenfatrecoveredfrombroilerskin
AT tanfajui influenceofrenderingmethodsonyieldandqualityofchickenfatrecoveredfrombroilerskin