Cargando…
Influence of rendering methods on yield and quality of chicken fat recovered from broiler skin
OBJECTIVE: In order to utilize fat from broiler byproducts efficiently, it is necessary to develop an appropriate rendering procedure and establish quality information for the rendered fat. A study was therefore undertaken to evaluate the influence of rendering methods on the amounts and general pro...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (AAAP) and Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology (KSAST)
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5411852/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27739292 http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.16.0434 |
_version_ | 1783232876931710976 |
---|---|
author | Lin, Liang-Kun Tan, Fa-Jui |
author_facet | Lin, Liang-Kun Tan, Fa-Jui |
author_sort | Lin, Liang-Kun |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: In order to utilize fat from broiler byproducts efficiently, it is necessary to develop an appropriate rendering procedure and establish quality information for the rendered fat. A study was therefore undertaken to evaluate the influence of rendering methods on the amounts and general properties of the fat recovered from broiler skin. METHODS: The yield and quality of the broiler skin fat rendered through high and lower energy microwave rendering (3.6 W/g for 10 min and 2.4 W/g for 10 min for high power microwave rendering (HPMR) and high power microwave rendering (LPMR), respectively), oven baking (OB, at 180°C for 40 min), and water cooking (WC, boiling for 40 min) were compared. RESULTS: Microwave-rendered skin exhibited the highest yields and fat recovery rates, followed by OB, and WC fats (p<0.05). HPMR fat had the highest L*, a*, and b* values, whereas WC fat had the highest moisture content, acid values, and thiobarbituric acid (TBA) values (p<0.05). There was no significant difference in the acid value, peroxide value, and TBA values between HPMR and LPMR fats. CONCLUSION: Microwave rendering at a power level of 3.6 W/g for 10 min is suggested base on the yield and quality of chicken fat. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5411852 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (AAAP) and Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology (KSAST) |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54118522017-06-01 Influence of rendering methods on yield and quality of chicken fat recovered from broiler skin Lin, Liang-Kun Tan, Fa-Jui Asian-Australas J Anim Sci Article OBJECTIVE: In order to utilize fat from broiler byproducts efficiently, it is necessary to develop an appropriate rendering procedure and establish quality information for the rendered fat. A study was therefore undertaken to evaluate the influence of rendering methods on the amounts and general properties of the fat recovered from broiler skin. METHODS: The yield and quality of the broiler skin fat rendered through high and lower energy microwave rendering (3.6 W/g for 10 min and 2.4 W/g for 10 min for high power microwave rendering (HPMR) and high power microwave rendering (LPMR), respectively), oven baking (OB, at 180°C for 40 min), and water cooking (WC, boiling for 40 min) were compared. RESULTS: Microwave-rendered skin exhibited the highest yields and fat recovery rates, followed by OB, and WC fats (p<0.05). HPMR fat had the highest L*, a*, and b* values, whereas WC fat had the highest moisture content, acid values, and thiobarbituric acid (TBA) values (p<0.05). There was no significant difference in the acid value, peroxide value, and TBA values between HPMR and LPMR fats. CONCLUSION: Microwave rendering at a power level of 3.6 W/g for 10 min is suggested base on the yield and quality of chicken fat. Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (AAAP) and Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology (KSAST) 2017-06 2016-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5411852/ /pubmed/27739292 http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.16.0434 Text en Copyright © 2017 by Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Article Lin, Liang-Kun Tan, Fa-Jui Influence of rendering methods on yield and quality of chicken fat recovered from broiler skin |
title | Influence of rendering methods on yield and quality of chicken fat recovered from broiler skin |
title_full | Influence of rendering methods on yield and quality of chicken fat recovered from broiler skin |
title_fullStr | Influence of rendering methods on yield and quality of chicken fat recovered from broiler skin |
title_full_unstemmed | Influence of rendering methods on yield and quality of chicken fat recovered from broiler skin |
title_short | Influence of rendering methods on yield and quality of chicken fat recovered from broiler skin |
title_sort | influence of rendering methods on yield and quality of chicken fat recovered from broiler skin |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5411852/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27739292 http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.16.0434 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT linliangkun influenceofrenderingmethodsonyieldandqualityofchickenfatrecoveredfrombroilerskin AT tanfajui influenceofrenderingmethodsonyieldandqualityofchickenfatrecoveredfrombroilerskin |