Cargando…

Microvesicles Contribute to the Bystander Effect of DNA Damage

Genotoxic treatments elicit DNA damage response (DDR) not only in cells that are directly exposed but also in cells that are not in the field of treatment (bystander cells), a phenomenon that is commonly referred to as the bystander effect (BE). However, mechanisms underlying the BE remain elusive....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Xiaozeng, Wei, Fengxiang, Major, Pierre, Al-Nedawi, Khalid, Al Saleh, Hassan A., Tang, Damu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5412372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28387728
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms18040788
_version_ 1783232985721470976
author Lin, Xiaozeng
Wei, Fengxiang
Major, Pierre
Al-Nedawi, Khalid
Al Saleh, Hassan A.
Tang, Damu
author_facet Lin, Xiaozeng
Wei, Fengxiang
Major, Pierre
Al-Nedawi, Khalid
Al Saleh, Hassan A.
Tang, Damu
author_sort Lin, Xiaozeng
collection PubMed
description Genotoxic treatments elicit DNA damage response (DDR) not only in cells that are directly exposed but also in cells that are not in the field of treatment (bystander cells), a phenomenon that is commonly referred to as the bystander effect (BE). However, mechanisms underlying the BE remain elusive. We report here that etoposide and ultraviolet (UV) exposure stimulate the production of microvesicles (MVs) in DU145 prostate cancer cells. MVs isolated from UV-treated DU145 and A431 epidermoid carcinoma cells as well as etoposide-treated DU145 cells induced phosphorylation of ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) at serine 1981 (indicative of ATM activation) and phosphorylation of histone H2AX at serine 139 (γH2AX) in naïve DU145 cells. Importantly, neutralization of MVs derived from UV-treated cells with annexin V significantly reduced the MV-associated BE activities. Etoposide and UV are known to induce DDR primarily through the ATM and ATM- and Rad3-related (ATR) pathways, respectively. In this regard, MV is likely a common source for the DNA damage-induced bystander effect. However, pre-treatment of DU145 naïve cells with an ATM (KU55933) inhibitor does not affect the BE elicited by MVs isolated from etoposide-treated cells, indicating that the BE is induced upstream of ATM actions. Taken together, we provide evidence supporting that MVs are a source of the DNA damage-induced bystander effect.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5412372
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54123722017-05-05 Microvesicles Contribute to the Bystander Effect of DNA Damage Lin, Xiaozeng Wei, Fengxiang Major, Pierre Al-Nedawi, Khalid Al Saleh, Hassan A. Tang, Damu Int J Mol Sci Article Genotoxic treatments elicit DNA damage response (DDR) not only in cells that are directly exposed but also in cells that are not in the field of treatment (bystander cells), a phenomenon that is commonly referred to as the bystander effect (BE). However, mechanisms underlying the BE remain elusive. We report here that etoposide and ultraviolet (UV) exposure stimulate the production of microvesicles (MVs) in DU145 prostate cancer cells. MVs isolated from UV-treated DU145 and A431 epidermoid carcinoma cells as well as etoposide-treated DU145 cells induced phosphorylation of ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) at serine 1981 (indicative of ATM activation) and phosphorylation of histone H2AX at serine 139 (γH2AX) in naïve DU145 cells. Importantly, neutralization of MVs derived from UV-treated cells with annexin V significantly reduced the MV-associated BE activities. Etoposide and UV are known to induce DDR primarily through the ATM and ATM- and Rad3-related (ATR) pathways, respectively. In this regard, MV is likely a common source for the DNA damage-induced bystander effect. However, pre-treatment of DU145 naïve cells with an ATM (KU55933) inhibitor does not affect the BE elicited by MVs isolated from etoposide-treated cells, indicating that the BE is induced upstream of ATM actions. Taken together, we provide evidence supporting that MVs are a source of the DNA damage-induced bystander effect. MDPI 2017-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5412372/ /pubmed/28387728 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms18040788 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Lin, Xiaozeng
Wei, Fengxiang
Major, Pierre
Al-Nedawi, Khalid
Al Saleh, Hassan A.
Tang, Damu
Microvesicles Contribute to the Bystander Effect of DNA Damage
title Microvesicles Contribute to the Bystander Effect of DNA Damage
title_full Microvesicles Contribute to the Bystander Effect of DNA Damage
title_fullStr Microvesicles Contribute to the Bystander Effect of DNA Damage
title_full_unstemmed Microvesicles Contribute to the Bystander Effect of DNA Damage
title_short Microvesicles Contribute to the Bystander Effect of DNA Damage
title_sort microvesicles contribute to the bystander effect of dna damage
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5412372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28387728
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms18040788
work_keys_str_mv AT linxiaozeng microvesiclescontributetothebystandereffectofdnadamage
AT weifengxiang microvesiclescontributetothebystandereffectofdnadamage
AT majorpierre microvesiclescontributetothebystandereffectofdnadamage
AT alnedawikhalid microvesiclescontributetothebystandereffectofdnadamage
AT alsalehhassana microvesiclescontributetothebystandereffectofdnadamage
AT tangdamu microvesiclescontributetothebystandereffectofdnadamage