Cargando…
Microvesicles Contribute to the Bystander Effect of DNA Damage
Genotoxic treatments elicit DNA damage response (DDR) not only in cells that are directly exposed but also in cells that are not in the field of treatment (bystander cells), a phenomenon that is commonly referred to as the bystander effect (BE). However, mechanisms underlying the BE remain elusive....
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5412372/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28387728 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms18040788 |
_version_ | 1783232985721470976 |
---|---|
author | Lin, Xiaozeng Wei, Fengxiang Major, Pierre Al-Nedawi, Khalid Al Saleh, Hassan A. Tang, Damu |
author_facet | Lin, Xiaozeng Wei, Fengxiang Major, Pierre Al-Nedawi, Khalid Al Saleh, Hassan A. Tang, Damu |
author_sort | Lin, Xiaozeng |
collection | PubMed |
description | Genotoxic treatments elicit DNA damage response (DDR) not only in cells that are directly exposed but also in cells that are not in the field of treatment (bystander cells), a phenomenon that is commonly referred to as the bystander effect (BE). However, mechanisms underlying the BE remain elusive. We report here that etoposide and ultraviolet (UV) exposure stimulate the production of microvesicles (MVs) in DU145 prostate cancer cells. MVs isolated from UV-treated DU145 and A431 epidermoid carcinoma cells as well as etoposide-treated DU145 cells induced phosphorylation of ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) at serine 1981 (indicative of ATM activation) and phosphorylation of histone H2AX at serine 139 (γH2AX) in naïve DU145 cells. Importantly, neutralization of MVs derived from UV-treated cells with annexin V significantly reduced the MV-associated BE activities. Etoposide and UV are known to induce DDR primarily through the ATM and ATM- and Rad3-related (ATR) pathways, respectively. In this regard, MV is likely a common source for the DNA damage-induced bystander effect. However, pre-treatment of DU145 naïve cells with an ATM (KU55933) inhibitor does not affect the BE elicited by MVs isolated from etoposide-treated cells, indicating that the BE is induced upstream of ATM actions. Taken together, we provide evidence supporting that MVs are a source of the DNA damage-induced bystander effect. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5412372 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54123722017-05-05 Microvesicles Contribute to the Bystander Effect of DNA Damage Lin, Xiaozeng Wei, Fengxiang Major, Pierre Al-Nedawi, Khalid Al Saleh, Hassan A. Tang, Damu Int J Mol Sci Article Genotoxic treatments elicit DNA damage response (DDR) not only in cells that are directly exposed but also in cells that are not in the field of treatment (bystander cells), a phenomenon that is commonly referred to as the bystander effect (BE). However, mechanisms underlying the BE remain elusive. We report here that etoposide and ultraviolet (UV) exposure stimulate the production of microvesicles (MVs) in DU145 prostate cancer cells. MVs isolated from UV-treated DU145 and A431 epidermoid carcinoma cells as well as etoposide-treated DU145 cells induced phosphorylation of ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) at serine 1981 (indicative of ATM activation) and phosphorylation of histone H2AX at serine 139 (γH2AX) in naïve DU145 cells. Importantly, neutralization of MVs derived from UV-treated cells with annexin V significantly reduced the MV-associated BE activities. Etoposide and UV are known to induce DDR primarily through the ATM and ATM- and Rad3-related (ATR) pathways, respectively. In this regard, MV is likely a common source for the DNA damage-induced bystander effect. However, pre-treatment of DU145 naïve cells with an ATM (KU55933) inhibitor does not affect the BE elicited by MVs isolated from etoposide-treated cells, indicating that the BE is induced upstream of ATM actions. Taken together, we provide evidence supporting that MVs are a source of the DNA damage-induced bystander effect. MDPI 2017-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5412372/ /pubmed/28387728 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms18040788 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Lin, Xiaozeng Wei, Fengxiang Major, Pierre Al-Nedawi, Khalid Al Saleh, Hassan A. Tang, Damu Microvesicles Contribute to the Bystander Effect of DNA Damage |
title | Microvesicles Contribute to the Bystander Effect of DNA Damage |
title_full | Microvesicles Contribute to the Bystander Effect of DNA Damage |
title_fullStr | Microvesicles Contribute to the Bystander Effect of DNA Damage |
title_full_unstemmed | Microvesicles Contribute to the Bystander Effect of DNA Damage |
title_short | Microvesicles Contribute to the Bystander Effect of DNA Damage |
title_sort | microvesicles contribute to the bystander effect of dna damage |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5412372/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28387728 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms18040788 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT linxiaozeng microvesiclescontributetothebystandereffectofdnadamage AT weifengxiang microvesiclescontributetothebystandereffectofdnadamage AT majorpierre microvesiclescontributetothebystandereffectofdnadamage AT alnedawikhalid microvesiclescontributetothebystandereffectofdnadamage AT alsalehhassana microvesiclescontributetothebystandereffectofdnadamage AT tangdamu microvesiclescontributetothebystandereffectofdnadamage |