Cargando…

Ziconotide Monotherapy: A Systematic Review of Randomised Controlled Trials

INTRODUCTION: Chronic neuropathic pain is difficult to treat and is often refractory to most modalities of treatment. Ziconotide is a novel, potent, non-opioid, calcium channel blocking agent which has been shown in clinical trials to be effective in treating chronic neuropathic pain. METHODS: EMBAS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brookes, Morag E., Eldabe, Sam, Batterham, Alan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bentham Science Publishers 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5412704/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26861472
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1570159X14666160210142056
_version_ 1783233061403492352
author Brookes, Morag E.
Eldabe, Sam
Batterham, Alan
author_facet Brookes, Morag E.
Eldabe, Sam
Batterham, Alan
author_sort Brookes, Morag E.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Chronic neuropathic pain is difficult to treat and is often refractory to most modalities of treatment. Ziconotide is a novel, potent, non-opioid, calcium channel blocking agent which has been shown in clinical trials to be effective in treating chronic neuropathic pain. METHODS: EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL Plus and Web of Science electronic databases were searched for English language studies. Reference sections of articles were examined for further papers and the manufacturer of ziconotide was contacted for further unpublished data. Three randomised controlled trials in ziconotide monotherapy were included and subjected to a random effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: All three studies used the similar main outcome measure (visual analogue scale of pain intensity; VASPI) and were therefore comparable. A Jadad score was performed for each paper. Frequent serious adverse events (SAEs) were observed which resulted in two of the studies revising the protocol. The meta-analysis revealed a pooled odds ratio (responders on ziconotide vs. placebo) of 2.77 (95% CI, 1.37 to 5.59). DISCUSSION: The results suggest that ziconotide is beneficial for pain reduction in chronic neuropathic pain. However, there remain some methodological issues that may call into question the validity of the results. It is evident that more work needs to be conducted to further validate the efficacy of ziconotide and to discover new areas of use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5412704
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Bentham Science Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54127042017-08-01 Ziconotide Monotherapy: A Systematic Review of Randomised Controlled Trials Brookes, Morag E. Eldabe, Sam Batterham, Alan Curr Neuropharmacol Article INTRODUCTION: Chronic neuropathic pain is difficult to treat and is often refractory to most modalities of treatment. Ziconotide is a novel, potent, non-opioid, calcium channel blocking agent which has been shown in clinical trials to be effective in treating chronic neuropathic pain. METHODS: EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL Plus and Web of Science electronic databases were searched for English language studies. Reference sections of articles were examined for further papers and the manufacturer of ziconotide was contacted for further unpublished data. Three randomised controlled trials in ziconotide monotherapy were included and subjected to a random effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: All three studies used the similar main outcome measure (visual analogue scale of pain intensity; VASPI) and were therefore comparable. A Jadad score was performed for each paper. Frequent serious adverse events (SAEs) were observed which resulted in two of the studies revising the protocol. The meta-analysis revealed a pooled odds ratio (responders on ziconotide vs. placebo) of 2.77 (95% CI, 1.37 to 5.59). DISCUSSION: The results suggest that ziconotide is beneficial for pain reduction in chronic neuropathic pain. However, there remain some methodological issues that may call into question the validity of the results. It is evident that more work needs to be conducted to further validate the efficacy of ziconotide and to discover new areas of use. Bentham Science Publishers 2017-02 2017-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5412704/ /pubmed/26861472 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1570159X14666160210142056 Text en © 2017 Bentham Science Publishers https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode), which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Brookes, Morag E.
Eldabe, Sam
Batterham, Alan
Ziconotide Monotherapy: A Systematic Review of Randomised Controlled Trials
title Ziconotide Monotherapy: A Systematic Review of Randomised Controlled Trials
title_full Ziconotide Monotherapy: A Systematic Review of Randomised Controlled Trials
title_fullStr Ziconotide Monotherapy: A Systematic Review of Randomised Controlled Trials
title_full_unstemmed Ziconotide Monotherapy: A Systematic Review of Randomised Controlled Trials
title_short Ziconotide Monotherapy: A Systematic Review of Randomised Controlled Trials
title_sort ziconotide monotherapy: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5412704/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26861472
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1570159X14666160210142056
work_keys_str_mv AT brookesmorage ziconotidemonotherapyasystematicreviewofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT eldabesam ziconotidemonotherapyasystematicreviewofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT batterhamalan ziconotidemonotherapyasystematicreviewofrandomisedcontrolledtrials