Cargando…
Ziconotide Monotherapy: A Systematic Review of Randomised Controlled Trials
INTRODUCTION: Chronic neuropathic pain is difficult to treat and is often refractory to most modalities of treatment. Ziconotide is a novel, potent, non-opioid, calcium channel blocking agent which has been shown in clinical trials to be effective in treating chronic neuropathic pain. METHODS: EMBAS...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Bentham Science Publishers
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5412704/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26861472 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1570159X14666160210142056 |
_version_ | 1783233061403492352 |
---|---|
author | Brookes, Morag E. Eldabe, Sam Batterham, Alan |
author_facet | Brookes, Morag E. Eldabe, Sam Batterham, Alan |
author_sort | Brookes, Morag E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Chronic neuropathic pain is difficult to treat and is often refractory to most modalities of treatment. Ziconotide is a novel, potent, non-opioid, calcium channel blocking agent which has been shown in clinical trials to be effective in treating chronic neuropathic pain. METHODS: EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL Plus and Web of Science electronic databases were searched for English language studies. Reference sections of articles were examined for further papers and the manufacturer of ziconotide was contacted for further unpublished data. Three randomised controlled trials in ziconotide monotherapy were included and subjected to a random effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: All three studies used the similar main outcome measure (visual analogue scale of pain intensity; VASPI) and were therefore comparable. A Jadad score was performed for each paper. Frequent serious adverse events (SAEs) were observed which resulted in two of the studies revising the protocol. The meta-analysis revealed a pooled odds ratio (responders on ziconotide vs. placebo) of 2.77 (95% CI, 1.37 to 5.59). DISCUSSION: The results suggest that ziconotide is beneficial for pain reduction in chronic neuropathic pain. However, there remain some methodological issues that may call into question the validity of the results. It is evident that more work needs to be conducted to further validate the efficacy of ziconotide and to discover new areas of use. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5412704 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Bentham Science Publishers |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54127042017-08-01 Ziconotide Monotherapy: A Systematic Review of Randomised Controlled Trials Brookes, Morag E. Eldabe, Sam Batterham, Alan Curr Neuropharmacol Article INTRODUCTION: Chronic neuropathic pain is difficult to treat and is often refractory to most modalities of treatment. Ziconotide is a novel, potent, non-opioid, calcium channel blocking agent which has been shown in clinical trials to be effective in treating chronic neuropathic pain. METHODS: EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL Plus and Web of Science electronic databases were searched for English language studies. Reference sections of articles were examined for further papers and the manufacturer of ziconotide was contacted for further unpublished data. Three randomised controlled trials in ziconotide monotherapy were included and subjected to a random effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: All three studies used the similar main outcome measure (visual analogue scale of pain intensity; VASPI) and were therefore comparable. A Jadad score was performed for each paper. Frequent serious adverse events (SAEs) were observed which resulted in two of the studies revising the protocol. The meta-analysis revealed a pooled odds ratio (responders on ziconotide vs. placebo) of 2.77 (95% CI, 1.37 to 5.59). DISCUSSION: The results suggest that ziconotide is beneficial for pain reduction in chronic neuropathic pain. However, there remain some methodological issues that may call into question the validity of the results. It is evident that more work needs to be conducted to further validate the efficacy of ziconotide and to discover new areas of use. Bentham Science Publishers 2017-02 2017-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5412704/ /pubmed/26861472 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1570159X14666160210142056 Text en © 2017 Bentham Science Publishers https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode), which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Article Brookes, Morag E. Eldabe, Sam Batterham, Alan Ziconotide Monotherapy: A Systematic Review of Randomised Controlled Trials |
title | Ziconotide Monotherapy: A Systematic Review of Randomised Controlled
Trials |
title_full | Ziconotide Monotherapy: A Systematic Review of Randomised Controlled
Trials |
title_fullStr | Ziconotide Monotherapy: A Systematic Review of Randomised Controlled
Trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Ziconotide Monotherapy: A Systematic Review of Randomised Controlled
Trials |
title_short | Ziconotide Monotherapy: A Systematic Review of Randomised Controlled
Trials |
title_sort | ziconotide monotherapy: a systematic review of randomised controlled
trials |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5412704/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26861472 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1570159X14666160210142056 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brookesmorage ziconotidemonotherapyasystematicreviewofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT eldabesam ziconotidemonotherapyasystematicreviewofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT batterhamalan ziconotidemonotherapyasystematicreviewofrandomisedcontrolledtrials |