Cargando…
Effects of Passive Finger Movement on Cortical Excitability
This study examined the effects of joint angle and passive movement direction on corticospinal excitability. The subjects were 14 healthy adults from whom consent could be obtained. We performed two experiments. In Experiment 1, we measured motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude, F-wave and M-wave a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5413571/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28515687 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00216 |
_version_ | 1783233204470153216 |
---|---|
author | Nakagawa, Masaki Sasaki, Ryoki Tsuiki, Shota Miyaguchi, Shota Kojima, Sho Saito, Kei Inukai, Yasuto Onishi, Hideaki |
author_facet | Nakagawa, Masaki Sasaki, Ryoki Tsuiki, Shota Miyaguchi, Shota Kojima, Sho Saito, Kei Inukai, Yasuto Onishi, Hideaki |
author_sort | Nakagawa, Masaki |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study examined the effects of joint angle and passive movement direction on corticospinal excitability. The subjects were 14 healthy adults from whom consent could be obtained. We performed two experiments. In Experiment 1, we measured motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude, F-wave and M-wave at 0° and 20° adduction during adduction or abduction movement, in the range of movement from 10° abduction to 30° adduction. In Experiment 2, MEPs were measured at static 0° and 20° adduction during passive adduction from 10° adduction to 30° adduction and static 20° adduction. MEP, F-waves and M-waves were recorded from the right first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle. Experiment 1 revealed significantly increased MEP amplitude at 0° during passive adduction compared to static 0° (p < 0.01). No other significant differences in MEP, M-wave and F-wave parameters were observed. In Experiment 2, MEP amplitude was significantly higher at 20° adduction during passive adduction compared with static 0° (p < 0.01). Based on these findings, it appears that fluctuations in MEP amplitude values during passive movement are not influenced by joint angle, but rather it is possible that it is due to intracortical afferent facilitation (AF) dependent on afferent input due to the start of movement and interstimulus interval (ISI) of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5413571 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54135712017-05-17 Effects of Passive Finger Movement on Cortical Excitability Nakagawa, Masaki Sasaki, Ryoki Tsuiki, Shota Miyaguchi, Shota Kojima, Sho Saito, Kei Inukai, Yasuto Onishi, Hideaki Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience This study examined the effects of joint angle and passive movement direction on corticospinal excitability. The subjects were 14 healthy adults from whom consent could be obtained. We performed two experiments. In Experiment 1, we measured motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude, F-wave and M-wave at 0° and 20° adduction during adduction or abduction movement, in the range of movement from 10° abduction to 30° adduction. In Experiment 2, MEPs were measured at static 0° and 20° adduction during passive adduction from 10° adduction to 30° adduction and static 20° adduction. MEP, F-waves and M-waves were recorded from the right first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle. Experiment 1 revealed significantly increased MEP amplitude at 0° during passive adduction compared to static 0° (p < 0.01). No other significant differences in MEP, M-wave and F-wave parameters were observed. In Experiment 2, MEP amplitude was significantly higher at 20° adduction during passive adduction compared with static 0° (p < 0.01). Based on these findings, it appears that fluctuations in MEP amplitude values during passive movement are not influenced by joint angle, but rather it is possible that it is due to intracortical afferent facilitation (AF) dependent on afferent input due to the start of movement and interstimulus interval (ISI) of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5413571/ /pubmed/28515687 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00216 Text en Copyright © 2017 Nakagawa, Sasaki, Tsuiki, Miyaguchi, Kojima, Saito, Inukai and Onishi. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Nakagawa, Masaki Sasaki, Ryoki Tsuiki, Shota Miyaguchi, Shota Kojima, Sho Saito, Kei Inukai, Yasuto Onishi, Hideaki Effects of Passive Finger Movement on Cortical Excitability |
title | Effects of Passive Finger Movement on Cortical Excitability |
title_full | Effects of Passive Finger Movement on Cortical Excitability |
title_fullStr | Effects of Passive Finger Movement on Cortical Excitability |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of Passive Finger Movement on Cortical Excitability |
title_short | Effects of Passive Finger Movement on Cortical Excitability |
title_sort | effects of passive finger movement on cortical excitability |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5413571/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28515687 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00216 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nakagawamasaki effectsofpassivefingermovementoncorticalexcitability AT sasakiryoki effectsofpassivefingermovementoncorticalexcitability AT tsuikishota effectsofpassivefingermovementoncorticalexcitability AT miyaguchishota effectsofpassivefingermovementoncorticalexcitability AT kojimasho effectsofpassivefingermovementoncorticalexcitability AT saitokei effectsofpassivefingermovementoncorticalexcitability AT inukaiyasuto effectsofpassivefingermovementoncorticalexcitability AT onishihideaki effectsofpassivefingermovementoncorticalexcitability |