Cargando…

Molecular classification of urothelial carcinoma: global mRNA classification versus tumour‐cell phenotype classification

Global mRNA expression analysis is efficient for phenotypic profiling of tumours, and has been used to define molecular subtypes for almost every major tumour type. A key limitation is that most tumours are communities of both tumour and non‐tumour cells. This problem is particularly pertinent for a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sjödahl, Gottfrid, Eriksson, Pontus, Liedberg, Fredrik, Höglund, Mattias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5413843/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28195647
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/path.4886
_version_ 1783233244765880320
author Sjödahl, Gottfrid
Eriksson, Pontus
Liedberg, Fredrik
Höglund, Mattias
author_facet Sjödahl, Gottfrid
Eriksson, Pontus
Liedberg, Fredrik
Höglund, Mattias
author_sort Sjödahl, Gottfrid
collection PubMed
description Global mRNA expression analysis is efficient for phenotypic profiling of tumours, and has been used to define molecular subtypes for almost every major tumour type. A key limitation is that most tumours are communities of both tumour and non‐tumour cells. This problem is particularly pertinent for analysis of advanced invasive tumours, which are known to induce major changes and responses in both the tumour and the surrounding tissue. To identify bladder cancer tumour‐cell phenotypes and compare classification by tumour‐cell phenotype with classification by global gene expression analysis, we analysed 307 advanced bladder cancers (cystectomized) both by genome gene expression analysis and by immunohistochemistry with antibodies for 28 proteins. According to systematic analysis of gene and protein expression data, focusing on key molecular processes, we describe five tumour‐cell phenotypes of advanced urothelial carcinoma: urothelial‐like, genomically unstable, basal/SCC‐like, mesenchymal‐like, and small‐cell/neuroendocrine‐like. We provide molecular pathological definitions for each subtype. Tumours expressing urothelial differentiation factors show inconsistent and abnormal protein expression of terminal differentiation markers, suggesting pseudo‐differentiation. Cancers with different tumour‐cell phenotypes may co‐cluster (converge), and cases with identical tumour‐cell phenotypes may cluster apart (diverge), in global mRNA analyses. This divergence/convergence suggests that broad global commonalities related to the invasive process may exist between muscle‐invasive tumours regardless of specific tumour‐cell phenotype. Hence, there is a systematic disagreement in subtype classification determined by global mRNA profiling and by immunohistochemical profiling at the tumour‐cell level. We suggest that a combination of molecular pathology (tumour‐cell phenotype) and global mRNA profiling (context) is required for adequate subtype classification of muscle‐invasive bladder cancer. © 2017 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5413843
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54138432017-05-19 Molecular classification of urothelial carcinoma: global mRNA classification versus tumour‐cell phenotype classification Sjödahl, Gottfrid Eriksson, Pontus Liedberg, Fredrik Höglund, Mattias J Pathol Original Papers Global mRNA expression analysis is efficient for phenotypic profiling of tumours, and has been used to define molecular subtypes for almost every major tumour type. A key limitation is that most tumours are communities of both tumour and non‐tumour cells. This problem is particularly pertinent for analysis of advanced invasive tumours, which are known to induce major changes and responses in both the tumour and the surrounding tissue. To identify bladder cancer tumour‐cell phenotypes and compare classification by tumour‐cell phenotype with classification by global gene expression analysis, we analysed 307 advanced bladder cancers (cystectomized) both by genome gene expression analysis and by immunohistochemistry with antibodies for 28 proteins. According to systematic analysis of gene and protein expression data, focusing on key molecular processes, we describe five tumour‐cell phenotypes of advanced urothelial carcinoma: urothelial‐like, genomically unstable, basal/SCC‐like, mesenchymal‐like, and small‐cell/neuroendocrine‐like. We provide molecular pathological definitions for each subtype. Tumours expressing urothelial differentiation factors show inconsistent and abnormal protein expression of terminal differentiation markers, suggesting pseudo‐differentiation. Cancers with different tumour‐cell phenotypes may co‐cluster (converge), and cases with identical tumour‐cell phenotypes may cluster apart (diverge), in global mRNA analyses. This divergence/convergence suggests that broad global commonalities related to the invasive process may exist between muscle‐invasive tumours regardless of specific tumour‐cell phenotype. Hence, there is a systematic disagreement in subtype classification determined by global mRNA profiling and by immunohistochemical profiling at the tumour‐cell level. We suggest that a combination of molecular pathology (tumour‐cell phenotype) and global mRNA profiling (context) is required for adequate subtype classification of muscle‐invasive bladder cancer. © 2017 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2017-03-28 2017-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5413843/ /pubmed/28195647 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/path.4886 Text en © 2017 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Papers
Sjödahl, Gottfrid
Eriksson, Pontus
Liedberg, Fredrik
Höglund, Mattias
Molecular classification of urothelial carcinoma: global mRNA classification versus tumour‐cell phenotype classification
title Molecular classification of urothelial carcinoma: global mRNA classification versus tumour‐cell phenotype classification
title_full Molecular classification of urothelial carcinoma: global mRNA classification versus tumour‐cell phenotype classification
title_fullStr Molecular classification of urothelial carcinoma: global mRNA classification versus tumour‐cell phenotype classification
title_full_unstemmed Molecular classification of urothelial carcinoma: global mRNA classification versus tumour‐cell phenotype classification
title_short Molecular classification of urothelial carcinoma: global mRNA classification versus tumour‐cell phenotype classification
title_sort molecular classification of urothelial carcinoma: global mrna classification versus tumour‐cell phenotype classification
topic Original Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5413843/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28195647
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/path.4886
work_keys_str_mv AT sjodahlgottfrid molecularclassificationofurothelialcarcinomaglobalmrnaclassificationversustumourcellphenotypeclassification
AT erikssonpontus molecularclassificationofurothelialcarcinomaglobalmrnaclassificationversustumourcellphenotypeclassification
AT liedbergfredrik molecularclassificationofurothelialcarcinomaglobalmrnaclassificationversustumourcellphenotypeclassification
AT hoglundmattias molecularclassificationofurothelialcarcinomaglobalmrnaclassificationversustumourcellphenotypeclassification