Cargando…
Ecosystem change and human health: implementation economics and policy
Several recent initiatives such as Planetary Health, EcoHealth and One Health claim that human health depends on flourishing natural ecosystems. However, little has been said about the operational and implementation challenges of health-oriented conservation actions on the ground. We contend that ec...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5413878/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28438919 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0130 |
_version_ | 1783233251836428288 |
---|---|
author | Pattanayak, S. K. Kramer, R. A. Vincent, J. R. |
author_facet | Pattanayak, S. K. Kramer, R. A. Vincent, J. R. |
author_sort | Pattanayak, S. K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Several recent initiatives such as Planetary Health, EcoHealth and One Health claim that human health depends on flourishing natural ecosystems. However, little has been said about the operational and implementation challenges of health-oriented conservation actions on the ground. We contend that ecological–epidemiological research must be complemented by a form of implementation science that examines: (i) the links between specific conservation actions and the resulting ecological changes, and (ii) how this ecological change impacts human health and well-being, when human behaviours are considered. Drawing on the policy evaluation tradition in public economics, first, we present three examples of recent social science research on conservation interventions that affect human health. These examples are from low- and middle-income countries in the tropics and subtropics. Second, drawing on these examples, we present three propositions related to impact evaluation and non-market valuation that can help guide future multidisciplinary research on conservation and human health. Research guided by these propositions will allow stakeholders to determine how ecosystem-mediated strategies for health promotion compare with more conventional biomedical prevention and treatment strategies for safeguarding health. This article is part of the themed issue ‘Conservation, biodiversity and infectious disease: scientific evidence and policy implications’. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5413878 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | The Royal Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54138782017-05-05 Ecosystem change and human health: implementation economics and policy Pattanayak, S. K. Kramer, R. A. Vincent, J. R. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Articles Several recent initiatives such as Planetary Health, EcoHealth and One Health claim that human health depends on flourishing natural ecosystems. However, little has been said about the operational and implementation challenges of health-oriented conservation actions on the ground. We contend that ecological–epidemiological research must be complemented by a form of implementation science that examines: (i) the links between specific conservation actions and the resulting ecological changes, and (ii) how this ecological change impacts human health and well-being, when human behaviours are considered. Drawing on the policy evaluation tradition in public economics, first, we present three examples of recent social science research on conservation interventions that affect human health. These examples are from low- and middle-income countries in the tropics and subtropics. Second, drawing on these examples, we present three propositions related to impact evaluation and non-market valuation that can help guide future multidisciplinary research on conservation and human health. Research guided by these propositions will allow stakeholders to determine how ecosystem-mediated strategies for health promotion compare with more conventional biomedical prevention and treatment strategies for safeguarding health. This article is part of the themed issue ‘Conservation, biodiversity and infectious disease: scientific evidence and policy implications’. The Royal Society 2017-06-05 2017-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5413878/ /pubmed/28438919 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0130 Text en © 2017 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Articles Pattanayak, S. K. Kramer, R. A. Vincent, J. R. Ecosystem change and human health: implementation economics and policy |
title | Ecosystem change and human health: implementation economics and policy |
title_full | Ecosystem change and human health: implementation economics and policy |
title_fullStr | Ecosystem change and human health: implementation economics and policy |
title_full_unstemmed | Ecosystem change and human health: implementation economics and policy |
title_short | Ecosystem change and human health: implementation economics and policy |
title_sort | ecosystem change and human health: implementation economics and policy |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5413878/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28438919 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0130 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pattanayaksk ecosystemchangeandhumanhealthimplementationeconomicsandpolicy AT kramerra ecosystemchangeandhumanhealthimplementationeconomicsandpolicy AT vincentjr ecosystemchangeandhumanhealthimplementationeconomicsandpolicy |