Cargando…

Efficacy Evaluation of a non-contact automatic articulating paper dispenser in controlling articulating paper microbial contamination

This study is to quantitatively evaluate the efficacy of using a non-contact automatic articulating paper dispenser for reducing microbial articulating paper contamination. Articulating papers in four-handed mode, non-four-handed mode, and via an automatic articulating paper dispenser were evaluated...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Yajin, Chen, Litong, Yuan, Fusong, Li, Yugui, Zhou, Yongsheng, Sun, Yuchun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5413883/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28466846
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep46729
_version_ 1783233252812652544
author Li, Yajin
Chen, Litong
Yuan, Fusong
Li, Yugui
Zhou, Yongsheng
Sun, Yuchun
author_facet Li, Yajin
Chen, Litong
Yuan, Fusong
Li, Yugui
Zhou, Yongsheng
Sun, Yuchun
author_sort Li, Yajin
collection PubMed
description This study is to quantitatively evaluate the efficacy of using a non-contact automatic articulating paper dispenser for reducing microbial articulating paper contamination. Articulating papers in four-handed mode, non-four-handed mode, and via an automatic articulating paper dispenser were evaluated. An adenosine triphosphate bioluminescence assay was used to quantitatively measure the relative light unit (RLU) values of the rest unused articulating papers in the same package to detect contamination at 4 time points, and triplicate examinations were performed for all three methods. The RLUs were recorded, compared, and evaluated. For four-handed mode (n = 36), the RLUs at the four time points were 2.44, 32.89, 37.89, and 27.22, with a satisfactory rate of 94%. The RLUs for non-four-handed mode (n = 36) were 2.22, 286.44, 299.44, and 493.56, with a satisfactory rate of 36%. The RLUs for using the automatic dispenser (n = 36) were all 0 with a satisfactory rate of 100%. The satisfactory rates were significantly different among three methods. No significant differences were observed in the satisfactory rates for the four time points samples. Contact by gloved hands can cause severe biological contamination of articulating paper. However, by using standard four-handed mode or a non-contact automatic articulating paper dispenser, contamination can be controlled.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5413883
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54138832017-05-03 Efficacy Evaluation of a non-contact automatic articulating paper dispenser in controlling articulating paper microbial contamination Li, Yajin Chen, Litong Yuan, Fusong Li, Yugui Zhou, Yongsheng Sun, Yuchun Sci Rep Article This study is to quantitatively evaluate the efficacy of using a non-contact automatic articulating paper dispenser for reducing microbial articulating paper contamination. Articulating papers in four-handed mode, non-four-handed mode, and via an automatic articulating paper dispenser were evaluated. An adenosine triphosphate bioluminescence assay was used to quantitatively measure the relative light unit (RLU) values of the rest unused articulating papers in the same package to detect contamination at 4 time points, and triplicate examinations were performed for all three methods. The RLUs were recorded, compared, and evaluated. For four-handed mode (n = 36), the RLUs at the four time points were 2.44, 32.89, 37.89, and 27.22, with a satisfactory rate of 94%. The RLUs for non-four-handed mode (n = 36) were 2.22, 286.44, 299.44, and 493.56, with a satisfactory rate of 36%. The RLUs for using the automatic dispenser (n = 36) were all 0 with a satisfactory rate of 100%. The satisfactory rates were significantly different among three methods. No significant differences were observed in the satisfactory rates for the four time points samples. Contact by gloved hands can cause severe biological contamination of articulating paper. However, by using standard four-handed mode or a non-contact automatic articulating paper dispenser, contamination can be controlled. Nature Publishing Group 2017-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5413883/ /pubmed/28466846 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep46729 Text en Copyright © 2017, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Li, Yajin
Chen, Litong
Yuan, Fusong
Li, Yugui
Zhou, Yongsheng
Sun, Yuchun
Efficacy Evaluation of a non-contact automatic articulating paper dispenser in controlling articulating paper microbial contamination
title Efficacy Evaluation of a non-contact automatic articulating paper dispenser in controlling articulating paper microbial contamination
title_full Efficacy Evaluation of a non-contact automatic articulating paper dispenser in controlling articulating paper microbial contamination
title_fullStr Efficacy Evaluation of a non-contact automatic articulating paper dispenser in controlling articulating paper microbial contamination
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy Evaluation of a non-contact automatic articulating paper dispenser in controlling articulating paper microbial contamination
title_short Efficacy Evaluation of a non-contact automatic articulating paper dispenser in controlling articulating paper microbial contamination
title_sort efficacy evaluation of a non-contact automatic articulating paper dispenser in controlling articulating paper microbial contamination
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5413883/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28466846
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep46729
work_keys_str_mv AT liyajin efficacyevaluationofanoncontactautomaticarticulatingpaperdispenserincontrollingarticulatingpapermicrobialcontamination
AT chenlitong efficacyevaluationofanoncontactautomaticarticulatingpaperdispenserincontrollingarticulatingpapermicrobialcontamination
AT yuanfusong efficacyevaluationofanoncontactautomaticarticulatingpaperdispenserincontrollingarticulatingpapermicrobialcontamination
AT liyugui efficacyevaluationofanoncontactautomaticarticulatingpaperdispenserincontrollingarticulatingpapermicrobialcontamination
AT zhouyongsheng efficacyevaluationofanoncontactautomaticarticulatingpaperdispenserincontrollingarticulatingpapermicrobialcontamination
AT sunyuchun efficacyevaluationofanoncontactautomaticarticulatingpaperdispenserincontrollingarticulatingpapermicrobialcontamination