Cargando…
Efficacy Evaluation of a non-contact automatic articulating paper dispenser in controlling articulating paper microbial contamination
This study is to quantitatively evaluate the efficacy of using a non-contact automatic articulating paper dispenser for reducing microbial articulating paper contamination. Articulating papers in four-handed mode, non-four-handed mode, and via an automatic articulating paper dispenser were evaluated...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5413883/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28466846 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep46729 |
_version_ | 1783233252812652544 |
---|---|
author | Li, Yajin Chen, Litong Yuan, Fusong Li, Yugui Zhou, Yongsheng Sun, Yuchun |
author_facet | Li, Yajin Chen, Litong Yuan, Fusong Li, Yugui Zhou, Yongsheng Sun, Yuchun |
author_sort | Li, Yajin |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study is to quantitatively evaluate the efficacy of using a non-contact automatic articulating paper dispenser for reducing microbial articulating paper contamination. Articulating papers in four-handed mode, non-four-handed mode, and via an automatic articulating paper dispenser were evaluated. An adenosine triphosphate bioluminescence assay was used to quantitatively measure the relative light unit (RLU) values of the rest unused articulating papers in the same package to detect contamination at 4 time points, and triplicate examinations were performed for all three methods. The RLUs were recorded, compared, and evaluated. For four-handed mode (n = 36), the RLUs at the four time points were 2.44, 32.89, 37.89, and 27.22, with a satisfactory rate of 94%. The RLUs for non-four-handed mode (n = 36) were 2.22, 286.44, 299.44, and 493.56, with a satisfactory rate of 36%. The RLUs for using the automatic dispenser (n = 36) were all 0 with a satisfactory rate of 100%. The satisfactory rates were significantly different among three methods. No significant differences were observed in the satisfactory rates for the four time points samples. Contact by gloved hands can cause severe biological contamination of articulating paper. However, by using standard four-handed mode or a non-contact automatic articulating paper dispenser, contamination can be controlled. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5413883 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54138832017-05-03 Efficacy Evaluation of a non-contact automatic articulating paper dispenser in controlling articulating paper microbial contamination Li, Yajin Chen, Litong Yuan, Fusong Li, Yugui Zhou, Yongsheng Sun, Yuchun Sci Rep Article This study is to quantitatively evaluate the efficacy of using a non-contact automatic articulating paper dispenser for reducing microbial articulating paper contamination. Articulating papers in four-handed mode, non-four-handed mode, and via an automatic articulating paper dispenser were evaluated. An adenosine triphosphate bioluminescence assay was used to quantitatively measure the relative light unit (RLU) values of the rest unused articulating papers in the same package to detect contamination at 4 time points, and triplicate examinations were performed for all three methods. The RLUs were recorded, compared, and evaluated. For four-handed mode (n = 36), the RLUs at the four time points were 2.44, 32.89, 37.89, and 27.22, with a satisfactory rate of 94%. The RLUs for non-four-handed mode (n = 36) were 2.22, 286.44, 299.44, and 493.56, with a satisfactory rate of 36%. The RLUs for using the automatic dispenser (n = 36) were all 0 with a satisfactory rate of 100%. The satisfactory rates were significantly different among three methods. No significant differences were observed in the satisfactory rates for the four time points samples. Contact by gloved hands can cause severe biological contamination of articulating paper. However, by using standard four-handed mode or a non-contact automatic articulating paper dispenser, contamination can be controlled. Nature Publishing Group 2017-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5413883/ /pubmed/28466846 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep46729 Text en Copyright © 2017, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Li, Yajin Chen, Litong Yuan, Fusong Li, Yugui Zhou, Yongsheng Sun, Yuchun Efficacy Evaluation of a non-contact automatic articulating paper dispenser in controlling articulating paper microbial contamination |
title | Efficacy Evaluation of a non-contact automatic articulating paper dispenser in controlling articulating paper microbial contamination |
title_full | Efficacy Evaluation of a non-contact automatic articulating paper dispenser in controlling articulating paper microbial contamination |
title_fullStr | Efficacy Evaluation of a non-contact automatic articulating paper dispenser in controlling articulating paper microbial contamination |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy Evaluation of a non-contact automatic articulating paper dispenser in controlling articulating paper microbial contamination |
title_short | Efficacy Evaluation of a non-contact automatic articulating paper dispenser in controlling articulating paper microbial contamination |
title_sort | efficacy evaluation of a non-contact automatic articulating paper dispenser in controlling articulating paper microbial contamination |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5413883/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28466846 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep46729 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liyajin efficacyevaluationofanoncontactautomaticarticulatingpaperdispenserincontrollingarticulatingpapermicrobialcontamination AT chenlitong efficacyevaluationofanoncontactautomaticarticulatingpaperdispenserincontrollingarticulatingpapermicrobialcontamination AT yuanfusong efficacyevaluationofanoncontactautomaticarticulatingpaperdispenserincontrollingarticulatingpapermicrobialcontamination AT liyugui efficacyevaluationofanoncontactautomaticarticulatingpaperdispenserincontrollingarticulatingpapermicrobialcontamination AT zhouyongsheng efficacyevaluationofanoncontactautomaticarticulatingpaperdispenserincontrollingarticulatingpapermicrobialcontamination AT sunyuchun efficacyevaluationofanoncontactautomaticarticulatingpaperdispenserincontrollingarticulatingpapermicrobialcontamination |