Cargando…

A Randomized, Comparative Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Two Injection Volumes of AbobotulinumtoxinA in Treatment of Glabellar Lines

Different volumes of 0.9% NaCl may be used to reconstitute abobotulinumtoxinA yielding an injection volume that ranges from 0.05 to 0.1 mL per injection point for treatment of glabellar lines. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and subject satisfaction of 2 different injection volumes to d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Punga, Anna Rostedt, Alimohammadi, Mohammad, Fagrell, Dan, Nyberg, Frida, Rees, Diane, Wong, Cindy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5414763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27399956
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000000805
_version_ 1783233415991001088
author Punga, Anna Rostedt
Alimohammadi, Mohammad
Fagrell, Dan
Nyberg, Frida
Rees, Diane
Wong, Cindy
author_facet Punga, Anna Rostedt
Alimohammadi, Mohammad
Fagrell, Dan
Nyberg, Frida
Rees, Diane
Wong, Cindy
author_sort Punga, Anna Rostedt
collection PubMed
description Different volumes of 0.9% NaCl may be used to reconstitute abobotulinumtoxinA yielding an injection volume that ranges from 0.05 to 0.1 mL per injection point for treatment of glabellar lines. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and subject satisfaction of 2 different injection volumes to deliver the same unit dose of abobotulinumtoxinA for treatment of glabellar lines. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This randomized comparative study was conducted using 2 different reconstitution volumes to deliver a fixed unit dose of 10 Speywood units (sU) of abobotulinumtoxinA in either 0.05 mL (labeled volume) or 0.1 mL (twofold volume) per injection point. Evaluations included wrinkle severity, neurophysiological assessment by compound muscle action potential (CMAP), and subject satisfaction. RESULTS: Use of either injection volume of abobotulinumtoxinA resulted in the early onset of effect, high effectiveness, and long duration of effect. The safety profile and injection pain levels were similar in both groups. The twofold injection volume was shown to be noninferior to the labeled injection volume based on CMAP results. CONCLUSION: A twofold increase in injection volume to 0.1 mL per injection point to deliver 10 sU of abobotulinumtoxinA is effective and safe.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5414763
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54147632017-05-10 A Randomized, Comparative Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Two Injection Volumes of AbobotulinumtoxinA in Treatment of Glabellar Lines Punga, Anna Rostedt Alimohammadi, Mohammad Fagrell, Dan Nyberg, Frida Rees, Diane Wong, Cindy Dermatol Surg Original Article Different volumes of 0.9% NaCl may be used to reconstitute abobotulinumtoxinA yielding an injection volume that ranges from 0.05 to 0.1 mL per injection point for treatment of glabellar lines. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and subject satisfaction of 2 different injection volumes to deliver the same unit dose of abobotulinumtoxinA for treatment of glabellar lines. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This randomized comparative study was conducted using 2 different reconstitution volumes to deliver a fixed unit dose of 10 Speywood units (sU) of abobotulinumtoxinA in either 0.05 mL (labeled volume) or 0.1 mL (twofold volume) per injection point. Evaluations included wrinkle severity, neurophysiological assessment by compound muscle action potential (CMAP), and subject satisfaction. RESULTS: Use of either injection volume of abobotulinumtoxinA resulted in the early onset of effect, high effectiveness, and long duration of effect. The safety profile and injection pain levels were similar in both groups. The twofold injection volume was shown to be noninferior to the labeled injection volume based on CMAP results. CONCLUSION: A twofold increase in injection volume to 0.1 mL per injection point to deliver 10 sU of abobotulinumtoxinA is effective and safe. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2016-08 2016-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5414763/ /pubmed/27399956 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000000805 Text en © 2016 by the American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, Inc. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially.
spellingShingle Original Article
Punga, Anna Rostedt
Alimohammadi, Mohammad
Fagrell, Dan
Nyberg, Frida
Rees, Diane
Wong, Cindy
A Randomized, Comparative Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Two Injection Volumes of AbobotulinumtoxinA in Treatment of Glabellar Lines
title A Randomized, Comparative Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Two Injection Volumes of AbobotulinumtoxinA in Treatment of Glabellar Lines
title_full A Randomized, Comparative Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Two Injection Volumes of AbobotulinumtoxinA in Treatment of Glabellar Lines
title_fullStr A Randomized, Comparative Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Two Injection Volumes of AbobotulinumtoxinA in Treatment of Glabellar Lines
title_full_unstemmed A Randomized, Comparative Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Two Injection Volumes of AbobotulinumtoxinA in Treatment of Glabellar Lines
title_short A Randomized, Comparative Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Two Injection Volumes of AbobotulinumtoxinA in Treatment of Glabellar Lines
title_sort randomized, comparative study to evaluate efficacy and safety of two injection volumes of abobotulinumtoxina in treatment of glabellar lines
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5414763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27399956
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000000805
work_keys_str_mv AT pungaannarostedt arandomizedcomparativestudytoevaluateefficacyandsafetyoftwoinjectionvolumesofabobotulinumtoxinaintreatmentofglabellarlines
AT alimohammadimohammad arandomizedcomparativestudytoevaluateefficacyandsafetyoftwoinjectionvolumesofabobotulinumtoxinaintreatmentofglabellarlines
AT fagrelldan arandomizedcomparativestudytoevaluateefficacyandsafetyoftwoinjectionvolumesofabobotulinumtoxinaintreatmentofglabellarlines
AT nybergfrida arandomizedcomparativestudytoevaluateefficacyandsafetyoftwoinjectionvolumesofabobotulinumtoxinaintreatmentofglabellarlines
AT reesdiane arandomizedcomparativestudytoevaluateefficacyandsafetyoftwoinjectionvolumesofabobotulinumtoxinaintreatmentofglabellarlines
AT wongcindy arandomizedcomparativestudytoevaluateefficacyandsafetyoftwoinjectionvolumesofabobotulinumtoxinaintreatmentofglabellarlines
AT pungaannarostedt randomizedcomparativestudytoevaluateefficacyandsafetyoftwoinjectionvolumesofabobotulinumtoxinaintreatmentofglabellarlines
AT alimohammadimohammad randomizedcomparativestudytoevaluateefficacyandsafetyoftwoinjectionvolumesofabobotulinumtoxinaintreatmentofglabellarlines
AT fagrelldan randomizedcomparativestudytoevaluateefficacyandsafetyoftwoinjectionvolumesofabobotulinumtoxinaintreatmentofglabellarlines
AT nybergfrida randomizedcomparativestudytoevaluateefficacyandsafetyoftwoinjectionvolumesofabobotulinumtoxinaintreatmentofglabellarlines
AT reesdiane randomizedcomparativestudytoevaluateefficacyandsafetyoftwoinjectionvolumesofabobotulinumtoxinaintreatmentofglabellarlines
AT wongcindy randomizedcomparativestudytoevaluateefficacyandsafetyoftwoinjectionvolumesofabobotulinumtoxinaintreatmentofglabellarlines