Cargando…

Development of a clinical algorithm for treating urethral strictures based on a large retrospective single-center cohort

Aim: To analyze clinical data from male patients treated with urethrotomy and to develop a clinical decision algorithm. Materials and methods: Two large cohorts of male patients with urethral strictures were included in this retrospective study, historical (1985-1995, n=491) and modern cohorts (1996...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tolkach, Yuri, Herrmann, Thomas, Merseburger, Axel, Burchardt, Martin, Wolters, Mathias, Huusmann, Stefan, Kramer, Mario, Kuczyk, Markus, Imkamp, Florian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: F1000Research 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5414819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28529689
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.9427.2
_version_ 1783233419406213120
author Tolkach, Yuri
Herrmann, Thomas
Merseburger, Axel
Burchardt, Martin
Wolters, Mathias
Huusmann, Stefan
Kramer, Mario
Kuczyk, Markus
Imkamp, Florian
author_facet Tolkach, Yuri
Herrmann, Thomas
Merseburger, Axel
Burchardt, Martin
Wolters, Mathias
Huusmann, Stefan
Kramer, Mario
Kuczyk, Markus
Imkamp, Florian
author_sort Tolkach, Yuri
collection PubMed
description Aim: To analyze clinical data from male patients treated with urethrotomy and to develop a clinical decision algorithm. Materials and methods: Two large cohorts of male patients with urethral strictures were included in this retrospective study, historical (1985-1995, n=491) and modern cohorts (1996-2006, n=470). All patients were treated with repeated internal urethrotomies (up to 9 sessions). Clinical outcomes were analyzed and systemized as a clinical decision algorithm. Results: The overall recurrence rates after the first urethrotomy were 32.4% and 23% in the historical and modern cohorts, respectively. In many patients, the second procedure was also effective with the third procedure also feasible in selected patients. The strictures with a length ≤ 2 cm should be treated according to the initial length. In patients with strictures ≤ 1 cm, the second session could be recommended in all patients, but not with penile strictures, strictures related to transurethral operations or for patients who were 31-50 years of age. The third session could be effective in selected cases of idiopathic bulbar strictures. For strictures with a length of 1-2 cm, a second operation is possible for the solitary low-grade bulbar strictures, given that the age is > 50 years and the etiology is not post-transurethral resection of the prostate. For penile strictures that are 1-2 cm, urethrotomy could be attempted in solitary but not in high-grade strictures. Conclusions: We present data on the treatment of urethral strictures with urethrotomy from a single center. Based on the analysis, a clinical decision algorithm was suggested, which could be a reliable basis for everyday clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5414819
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher F1000Research
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54148192017-05-18 Development of a clinical algorithm for treating urethral strictures based on a large retrospective single-center cohort Tolkach, Yuri Herrmann, Thomas Merseburger, Axel Burchardt, Martin Wolters, Mathias Huusmann, Stefan Kramer, Mario Kuczyk, Markus Imkamp, Florian F1000Res Research Article Aim: To analyze clinical data from male patients treated with urethrotomy and to develop a clinical decision algorithm. Materials and methods: Two large cohorts of male patients with urethral strictures were included in this retrospective study, historical (1985-1995, n=491) and modern cohorts (1996-2006, n=470). All patients were treated with repeated internal urethrotomies (up to 9 sessions). Clinical outcomes were analyzed and systemized as a clinical decision algorithm. Results: The overall recurrence rates after the first urethrotomy were 32.4% and 23% in the historical and modern cohorts, respectively. In many patients, the second procedure was also effective with the third procedure also feasible in selected patients. The strictures with a length ≤ 2 cm should be treated according to the initial length. In patients with strictures ≤ 1 cm, the second session could be recommended in all patients, but not with penile strictures, strictures related to transurethral operations or for patients who were 31-50 years of age. The third session could be effective in selected cases of idiopathic bulbar strictures. For strictures with a length of 1-2 cm, a second operation is possible for the solitary low-grade bulbar strictures, given that the age is > 50 years and the etiology is not post-transurethral resection of the prostate. For penile strictures that are 1-2 cm, urethrotomy could be attempted in solitary but not in high-grade strictures. Conclusions: We present data on the treatment of urethral strictures with urethrotomy from a single center. Based on the analysis, a clinical decision algorithm was suggested, which could be a reliable basis for everyday clinical practice. F1000Research 2017-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5414819/ /pubmed/28529689 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.9427.2 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Tolkach Y et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tolkach, Yuri
Herrmann, Thomas
Merseburger, Axel
Burchardt, Martin
Wolters, Mathias
Huusmann, Stefan
Kramer, Mario
Kuczyk, Markus
Imkamp, Florian
Development of a clinical algorithm for treating urethral strictures based on a large retrospective single-center cohort
title Development of a clinical algorithm for treating urethral strictures based on a large retrospective single-center cohort
title_full Development of a clinical algorithm for treating urethral strictures based on a large retrospective single-center cohort
title_fullStr Development of a clinical algorithm for treating urethral strictures based on a large retrospective single-center cohort
title_full_unstemmed Development of a clinical algorithm for treating urethral strictures based on a large retrospective single-center cohort
title_short Development of a clinical algorithm for treating urethral strictures based on a large retrospective single-center cohort
title_sort development of a clinical algorithm for treating urethral strictures based on a large retrospective single-center cohort
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5414819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28529689
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.9427.2
work_keys_str_mv AT tolkachyuri developmentofaclinicalalgorithmfortreatingurethralstricturesbasedonalargeretrospectivesinglecentercohort
AT herrmannthomas developmentofaclinicalalgorithmfortreatingurethralstricturesbasedonalargeretrospectivesinglecentercohort
AT merseburgeraxel developmentofaclinicalalgorithmfortreatingurethralstricturesbasedonalargeretrospectivesinglecentercohort
AT burchardtmartin developmentofaclinicalalgorithmfortreatingurethralstricturesbasedonalargeretrospectivesinglecentercohort
AT woltersmathias developmentofaclinicalalgorithmfortreatingurethralstricturesbasedonalargeretrospectivesinglecentercohort
AT huusmannstefan developmentofaclinicalalgorithmfortreatingurethralstricturesbasedonalargeretrospectivesinglecentercohort
AT kramermario developmentofaclinicalalgorithmfortreatingurethralstricturesbasedonalargeretrospectivesinglecentercohort
AT kuczykmarkus developmentofaclinicalalgorithmfortreatingurethralstricturesbasedonalargeretrospectivesinglecentercohort
AT imkampflorian developmentofaclinicalalgorithmfortreatingurethralstricturesbasedonalargeretrospectivesinglecentercohort