Cargando…

Can we use the ipsilateral Hamstrings for ACL Reconstruction in case of medial collateral ligament insufficiency?

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Semitendinosus and gracilis muscles (hamstring muscles) are frequently harvested autologous tendon grafts of the knee e.g. for cruciate ligament reconstruction. This study investigated the joint-stabilizing effects of these muscles in case of insufficiency of the medial collater...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Domnick, Christoph, Herbort, Mirco, Zoll, Alexander
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5415027/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967117S00135
_version_ 1783233453106397184
author Domnick, Christoph
Herbort, Mirco
Zoll, Alexander
author_facet Domnick, Christoph
Herbort, Mirco
Zoll, Alexander
author_sort Domnick, Christoph
collection PubMed
description AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Semitendinosus and gracilis muscles (hamstring muscles) are frequently harvested autologous tendon grafts of the knee e.g. for cruciate ligament reconstruction. This study investigated the joint-stabilizing effects of these muscles in case of insufficiency of the medial collateral ligament (MCL). Hypotheses: First, both the semitendinosus and the gracilis muscles can actively stabilize the joint against valgus stress in the medial collateral unstable knee. Second, this stabilizing influence of these muscles decreases with increasing flexion angle METERIALS AND METHODS: Kinematics were examined in ten fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees using a robotic/UFS testing system and an optical tracking system. The knee kinematics under 5 Nm and 10 Nm valgus stress were determined in the a) MCL intact and b) MCL deficient knee in different flexion angles, respectively using the following simulated muscle loads: 1) 0 N (Idle), 2) 200 N semitendinosus load (ST) and 3) 280 N combined semitendinosus and gracilis load (STGT). RESULTS: Cutting the MCL increased valgus angle under all tested conditions and angles in contrast to the MCL intact knee by 4.3-8.1 degrees for 5 Nm, 6.5-11.9 degrees for 10 Nm valgus torque; P<.01; RM-ANOVA). Applied 200 N simulated ST load reduced the valgus angle significantly in 0°, 10°, 20° and 30° of flexion under 5 Nm and 10 Nm (P< .05) valgus stress. In 0°, 10° and 20° these values were close to the MCL intact joint under the respective torque (both P >.05). The combined 280 N simulated STGT load reduced significantly valgus angle in 0°, 10° and 20° of flexion under 5 Nm and 10 Nm of valgus stress (P< .05) to values near the intact joint (5 Nm: 0°, 10°; 10 Nm: 0°, 10°, 20° - P >.05). In 60° and 90° of flexion ST and STGT loads could not decrease resulting valgus angle of the MCL deficient knee (without hamstring load; P>.05 or valgus increase P<.05). CONCLUSION: In this human cadaveric study semitendinosus and gracilis muscles can successfully stabilize against valgus stress in the MCL insufficient knee in near-to-extension flexion angles. In the valgus-unstable knee, hamstring muscles should be preserved in (multi-) ligament surgery, but also in joint arthroplasty and osteosynthesis if possible.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5415027
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54150272017-05-15 Can we use the ipsilateral Hamstrings for ACL Reconstruction in case of medial collateral ligament insufficiency? Domnick, Christoph Herbort, Mirco Zoll, Alexander Orthop J Sports Med Article AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Semitendinosus and gracilis muscles (hamstring muscles) are frequently harvested autologous tendon grafts of the knee e.g. for cruciate ligament reconstruction. This study investigated the joint-stabilizing effects of these muscles in case of insufficiency of the medial collateral ligament (MCL). Hypotheses: First, both the semitendinosus and the gracilis muscles can actively stabilize the joint against valgus stress in the medial collateral unstable knee. Second, this stabilizing influence of these muscles decreases with increasing flexion angle METERIALS AND METHODS: Kinematics were examined in ten fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees using a robotic/UFS testing system and an optical tracking system. The knee kinematics under 5 Nm and 10 Nm valgus stress were determined in the a) MCL intact and b) MCL deficient knee in different flexion angles, respectively using the following simulated muscle loads: 1) 0 N (Idle), 2) 200 N semitendinosus load (ST) and 3) 280 N combined semitendinosus and gracilis load (STGT). RESULTS: Cutting the MCL increased valgus angle under all tested conditions and angles in contrast to the MCL intact knee by 4.3-8.1 degrees for 5 Nm, 6.5-11.9 degrees for 10 Nm valgus torque; P<.01; RM-ANOVA). Applied 200 N simulated ST load reduced the valgus angle significantly in 0°, 10°, 20° and 30° of flexion under 5 Nm and 10 Nm (P< .05) valgus stress. In 0°, 10° and 20° these values were close to the MCL intact joint under the respective torque (both P >.05). The combined 280 N simulated STGT load reduced significantly valgus angle in 0°, 10° and 20° of flexion under 5 Nm and 10 Nm of valgus stress (P< .05) to values near the intact joint (5 Nm: 0°, 10°; 10 Nm: 0°, 10°, 20° - P >.05). In 60° and 90° of flexion ST and STGT loads could not decrease resulting valgus angle of the MCL deficient knee (without hamstring load; P>.05 or valgus increase P<.05). CONCLUSION: In this human cadaveric study semitendinosus and gracilis muscles can successfully stabilize against valgus stress in the MCL insufficient knee in near-to-extension flexion angles. In the valgus-unstable knee, hamstring muscles should be preserved in (multi-) ligament surgery, but also in joint arthroplasty and osteosynthesis if possible. SAGE Publications 2017-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5415027/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967117S00135 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This open-access article is published and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits the noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction of the article in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this article without the permission of the Author(s). For reprints and permission queries, please visit SAGE’s Web site at http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav.
spellingShingle Article
Domnick, Christoph
Herbort, Mirco
Zoll, Alexander
Can we use the ipsilateral Hamstrings for ACL Reconstruction in case of medial collateral ligament insufficiency?
title Can we use the ipsilateral Hamstrings for ACL Reconstruction in case of medial collateral ligament insufficiency?
title_full Can we use the ipsilateral Hamstrings for ACL Reconstruction in case of medial collateral ligament insufficiency?
title_fullStr Can we use the ipsilateral Hamstrings for ACL Reconstruction in case of medial collateral ligament insufficiency?
title_full_unstemmed Can we use the ipsilateral Hamstrings for ACL Reconstruction in case of medial collateral ligament insufficiency?
title_short Can we use the ipsilateral Hamstrings for ACL Reconstruction in case of medial collateral ligament insufficiency?
title_sort can we use the ipsilateral hamstrings for acl reconstruction in case of medial collateral ligament insufficiency?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5415027/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967117S00135
work_keys_str_mv AT domnickchristoph canweusetheipsilateralhamstringsforaclreconstructionincaseofmedialcollateralligamentinsufficiency
AT herbortmirco canweusetheipsilateralhamstringsforaclreconstructionincaseofmedialcollateralligamentinsufficiency
AT zollalexander canweusetheipsilateralhamstringsforaclreconstructionincaseofmedialcollateralligamentinsufficiency