Cargando…

Worldwide research productivity in emergency contraception: a bibliometric analysis

BACKGROUND: The main goal of this study was to assess worldwide research activity in emergency contraception (EC) using bibliometric indicators. METHODS: Data in SciVerse Scopus were searched for documents pertaining to emergency contraception. Data obtained were then exported to Microsoft Excel and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sweileh, Waleed M, Zyoud, Sa’ed H, Al-Jabi, Samah W, Sawalha, Ansam F
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5415191/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28620511
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2054-7099-1-6
_version_ 1783233487014199296
author Sweileh, Waleed M
Zyoud, Sa’ed H
Al-Jabi, Samah W
Sawalha, Ansam F
author_facet Sweileh, Waleed M
Zyoud, Sa’ed H
Al-Jabi, Samah W
Sawalha, Ansam F
author_sort Sweileh, Waleed M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The main goal of this study was to assess worldwide research activity in emergency contraception (EC) using bibliometric indicators. METHODS: Data in SciVerse Scopus were searched for documents pertaining to emergency contraception. Data obtained were then exported to Microsoft Excel and analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences. RESULTS: A total of 2142 documents were published about EC worldwide. Documents were written in 27 different languages and were published from 78 countries. Publications in EC started on late 1960s. Total number of citations for published EC documents was 30154 while median citation per document was six. The h-index of the retrieved documents was 58. The leading country in EC research was United States of America with a total of 559 documents (26.10%). One hundred and ninety five (9.10%) documents were published in Contraception journal. The leading institution in EC research and publications was Princeton University (50; 2.33%) followed by University of California, San Francisco (34; 1.59%). CONCLUSIONS: The present data revealed that there is a worldwide increasing interest in EC research. Willingness of health policy makers to make EC accessible to the public will determine the future of EC research activity and future of EC as a contraceptive method.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5415191
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54151912017-06-15 Worldwide research productivity in emergency contraception: a bibliometric analysis Sweileh, Waleed M Zyoud, Sa’ed H Al-Jabi, Samah W Sawalha, Ansam F Fertil Res Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: The main goal of this study was to assess worldwide research activity in emergency contraception (EC) using bibliometric indicators. METHODS: Data in SciVerse Scopus were searched for documents pertaining to emergency contraception. Data obtained were then exported to Microsoft Excel and analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences. RESULTS: A total of 2142 documents were published about EC worldwide. Documents were written in 27 different languages and were published from 78 countries. Publications in EC started on late 1960s. Total number of citations for published EC documents was 30154 while median citation per document was six. The h-index of the retrieved documents was 58. The leading country in EC research was United States of America with a total of 559 documents (26.10%). One hundred and ninety five (9.10%) documents were published in Contraception journal. The leading institution in EC research and publications was Princeton University (50; 2.33%) followed by University of California, San Francisco (34; 1.59%). CONCLUSIONS: The present data revealed that there is a worldwide increasing interest in EC research. Willingness of health policy makers to make EC accessible to the public will determine the future of EC research activity and future of EC as a contraceptive method. BioMed Central 2015-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5415191/ /pubmed/28620511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2054-7099-1-6 Text en © Sweileh et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sweileh, Waleed M
Zyoud, Sa’ed H
Al-Jabi, Samah W
Sawalha, Ansam F
Worldwide research productivity in emergency contraception: a bibliometric analysis
title Worldwide research productivity in emergency contraception: a bibliometric analysis
title_full Worldwide research productivity in emergency contraception: a bibliometric analysis
title_fullStr Worldwide research productivity in emergency contraception: a bibliometric analysis
title_full_unstemmed Worldwide research productivity in emergency contraception: a bibliometric analysis
title_short Worldwide research productivity in emergency contraception: a bibliometric analysis
title_sort worldwide research productivity in emergency contraception: a bibliometric analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5415191/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28620511
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2054-7099-1-6
work_keys_str_mv AT sweilehwaleedm worldwideresearchproductivityinemergencycontraceptionabibliometricanalysis
AT zyoudsaedh worldwideresearchproductivityinemergencycontraceptionabibliometricanalysis
AT aljabisamahw worldwideresearchproductivityinemergencycontraceptionabibliometricanalysis
AT sawalhaansamf worldwideresearchproductivityinemergencycontraceptionabibliometricanalysis