Cargando…

Pelvic pedicled omental flaps and autologous free omental grafts in a rabbit model

BACKGROUND: There is a need to identify an inexpensive, effective method to prevent postoperative adhesion formation. The objective of this study was to create a novel model for studying omentum as a pelvic adhesion barrier. Randomized, prospective, controlled surgical intervention with serial follo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bailey, Amelia P, Schutt, Amy K, Pastore, Lisa M, Stovall, Dale W
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5415197/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28620508
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2054-7099-1-3
_version_ 1783233488576577536
author Bailey, Amelia P
Schutt, Amy K
Pastore, Lisa M
Stovall, Dale W
author_facet Bailey, Amelia P
Schutt, Amy K
Pastore, Lisa M
Stovall, Dale W
author_sort Bailey, Amelia P
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is a need to identify an inexpensive, effective method to prevent postoperative adhesion formation. The objective of this study was to create a novel model for studying omentum as a pelvic adhesion barrier. Randomized, prospective, controlled surgical intervention with serial follow-up in 16 female rabbits at a University-based Center for Comparative Medicine. Interventions included bilateral hysterotomy incision and repair. The left hysterotomy was randomized into coverage with an omental flap or graft; the right hysterotomy remained uncovered. Adhesions were scored via laparoscopy on postoperative days 2, 4, 8, and 12; postmortem evaluation and scoring took place on postoperative day 16. Statistical tests consisted of Kappa tests of agreement between adhesion scorers and Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric tests for the comparison of adhesion scores by intervention arm and by uterine horn. RESULTS: All omental flaps and grafts survived. The only significant difference in mean adhesion scores was seen in non-hysterotomy-associated adhesions, where grafts had a lower score than flaps (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Survival of all omental flaps and grafts demonstrates that this is a practical model for studying omentum as a pelvic adhesion barrier. Determining the efficacy of omentum as a pelvic adhesion barrier will require further investigation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5415197
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54151972017-06-15 Pelvic pedicled omental flaps and autologous free omental grafts in a rabbit model Bailey, Amelia P Schutt, Amy K Pastore, Lisa M Stovall, Dale W Fertil Res Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: There is a need to identify an inexpensive, effective method to prevent postoperative adhesion formation. The objective of this study was to create a novel model for studying omentum as a pelvic adhesion barrier. Randomized, prospective, controlled surgical intervention with serial follow-up in 16 female rabbits at a University-based Center for Comparative Medicine. Interventions included bilateral hysterotomy incision and repair. The left hysterotomy was randomized into coverage with an omental flap or graft; the right hysterotomy remained uncovered. Adhesions were scored via laparoscopy on postoperative days 2, 4, 8, and 12; postmortem evaluation and scoring took place on postoperative day 16. Statistical tests consisted of Kappa tests of agreement between adhesion scorers and Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric tests for the comparison of adhesion scores by intervention arm and by uterine horn. RESULTS: All omental flaps and grafts survived. The only significant difference in mean adhesion scores was seen in non-hysterotomy-associated adhesions, where grafts had a lower score than flaps (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Survival of all omental flaps and grafts demonstrates that this is a practical model for studying omentum as a pelvic adhesion barrier. Determining the efficacy of omentum as a pelvic adhesion barrier will require further investigation. BioMed Central 2015-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5415197/ /pubmed/28620508 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2054-7099-1-3 Text en © Bailey et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bailey, Amelia P
Schutt, Amy K
Pastore, Lisa M
Stovall, Dale W
Pelvic pedicled omental flaps and autologous free omental grafts in a rabbit model
title Pelvic pedicled omental flaps and autologous free omental grafts in a rabbit model
title_full Pelvic pedicled omental flaps and autologous free omental grafts in a rabbit model
title_fullStr Pelvic pedicled omental flaps and autologous free omental grafts in a rabbit model
title_full_unstemmed Pelvic pedicled omental flaps and autologous free omental grafts in a rabbit model
title_short Pelvic pedicled omental flaps and autologous free omental grafts in a rabbit model
title_sort pelvic pedicled omental flaps and autologous free omental grafts in a rabbit model
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5415197/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28620508
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2054-7099-1-3
work_keys_str_mv AT baileyameliap pelvicpedicledomentalflapsandautologousfreeomentalgraftsinarabbitmodel
AT schuttamyk pelvicpedicledomentalflapsandautologousfreeomentalgraftsinarabbitmodel
AT pastorelisam pelvicpedicledomentalflapsandautologousfreeomentalgraftsinarabbitmodel
AT stovalldalew pelvicpedicledomentalflapsandautologousfreeomentalgraftsinarabbitmodel