Cargando…

Surgical Updates in the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Pelvic organ prolapse affects approximately 8% of women, and the demand for pelvic organ prolapse surgery is expected to increase by nearly 50% over the next 40 years. The surgical techniques used to correct pelvic organ prolapse have evolved over the last 10 years, with multiple well-designed studi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Geynisman-Tan, Julia, Kenton, Kimberly
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Rambam Health Care Campus 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5415363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28467763
http://dx.doi.org/10.5041/RMMJ.10294
_version_ 1783233509804998656
author Geynisman-Tan, Julia
Kenton, Kimberly
author_facet Geynisman-Tan, Julia
Kenton, Kimberly
author_sort Geynisman-Tan, Julia
collection PubMed
description Pelvic organ prolapse affects approximately 8% of women, and the demand for pelvic organ prolapse surgery is expected to increase by nearly 50% over the next 40 years. The surgical techniques used to correct pelvic organ prolapse have evolved over the last 10 years, with multiple well-designed studies addressing the risks, outcomes, reoperation rates, and optimal surgical approaches. Here we review the most recent evidence on the route of access, concomitant procedures, and synthetic materials for augmenting the repair. Ultimately, this review highlights that there is no optimal method for correcting pelvic organ prolapse and that the risks, benefits, and approaches should be discussed in a patient-centered, goal-oriented approach to decision-making.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5415363
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Rambam Health Care Campus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54153632017-05-10 Surgical Updates in the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Geynisman-Tan, Julia Kenton, Kimberly Rambam Maimonides Med J Special Issue on Gynecology, Fertility, and Obstetrics Pelvic organ prolapse affects approximately 8% of women, and the demand for pelvic organ prolapse surgery is expected to increase by nearly 50% over the next 40 years. The surgical techniques used to correct pelvic organ prolapse have evolved over the last 10 years, with multiple well-designed studies addressing the risks, outcomes, reoperation rates, and optimal surgical approaches. Here we review the most recent evidence on the route of access, concomitant procedures, and synthetic materials for augmenting the repair. Ultimately, this review highlights that there is no optimal method for correcting pelvic organ prolapse and that the risks, benefits, and approaches should be discussed in a patient-centered, goal-oriented approach to decision-making. Rambam Health Care Campus 2017-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5415363/ /pubmed/28467763 http://dx.doi.org/10.5041/RMMJ.10294 Text en © 2017 Geynisman-Tan and Kenton. This is an open-access article. All its content, except where otherwise noted, is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Special Issue on Gynecology, Fertility, and Obstetrics
Geynisman-Tan, Julia
Kenton, Kimberly
Surgical Updates in the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse
title Surgical Updates in the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse
title_full Surgical Updates in the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse
title_fullStr Surgical Updates in the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse
title_full_unstemmed Surgical Updates in the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse
title_short Surgical Updates in the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse
title_sort surgical updates in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse
topic Special Issue on Gynecology, Fertility, and Obstetrics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5415363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28467763
http://dx.doi.org/10.5041/RMMJ.10294
work_keys_str_mv AT geynismantanjulia surgicalupdatesinthetreatmentofpelvicorganprolapse
AT kentonkimberly surgicalupdatesinthetreatmentofpelvicorganprolapse