Cargando…

Anovulatory Patients Demonstrate a Sharp Decline in LH Levels upon GnRH Antagonist Administration during IVF Cycles

To evaluate the decrease in luteinizing hormone (LH) levels following gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist administration in in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles, data were retrospectively collected from 305 consecutive IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles of patients who...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Segal, Linoy, Fainaru, Ofer, Kol, Shahar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Rambam Health Care Campus 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5415367/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28467764
http://dx.doi.org/10.5041/RMMJ.10298
_version_ 1783233510840991744
author Segal, Linoy
Fainaru, Ofer
Kol, Shahar
author_facet Segal, Linoy
Fainaru, Ofer
Kol, Shahar
author_sort Segal, Linoy
collection PubMed
description To evaluate the decrease in luteinizing hormone (LH) levels following gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist administration in in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles, data were retrospectively collected from 305 consecutive IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles of patients who underwent ovarian stimulation with gonadotropins and were treated with GnRH antagonist for the prevention of premature luteinization. We compared the percent change in LH concentration from stimulation start to that observed before ovulation triggering in patients with or without anovulation. Anovulatory patients were younger, with higher body mass index (BMI), and demonstrated higher ovarian reserve parameters as compared to ovulatory patients. The decline in LH concentration was almost two-fold greater in anovulatory versus ovulatory patients. Numbers of oocytes, fertilizations, cleavage stage embryos, and transferred embryos were similar; however, implantation rates were higher in anovulatory versus ovulatory patients. Older patients (age ≥39) showed a smaller decline in LH levels as compared to younger ones (age <39) and exhibited poor IVF outcomes. There is a wide range of pituitary responses to GnRH antagonists. Anovulatory patients are more susceptible to GnRH antagonists and therefore demonstrate over-suppression of the pituitary. Older patients demonstrate a reduced pituitary response to GnRH antagonists than younger ones. Cycle scheduling with estradiol pretreatment did not influence LH decline, nor IVF treatment outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5415367
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Rambam Health Care Campus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54153672017-05-10 Anovulatory Patients Demonstrate a Sharp Decline in LH Levels upon GnRH Antagonist Administration during IVF Cycles Segal, Linoy Fainaru, Ofer Kol, Shahar Rambam Maimonides Med J Special Issue on Gynecology, Fertility, and Obstetrics To evaluate the decrease in luteinizing hormone (LH) levels following gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist administration in in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles, data were retrospectively collected from 305 consecutive IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles of patients who underwent ovarian stimulation with gonadotropins and were treated with GnRH antagonist for the prevention of premature luteinization. We compared the percent change in LH concentration from stimulation start to that observed before ovulation triggering in patients with or without anovulation. Anovulatory patients were younger, with higher body mass index (BMI), and demonstrated higher ovarian reserve parameters as compared to ovulatory patients. The decline in LH concentration was almost two-fold greater in anovulatory versus ovulatory patients. Numbers of oocytes, fertilizations, cleavage stage embryos, and transferred embryos were similar; however, implantation rates were higher in anovulatory versus ovulatory patients. Older patients (age ≥39) showed a smaller decline in LH levels as compared to younger ones (age <39) and exhibited poor IVF outcomes. There is a wide range of pituitary responses to GnRH antagonists. Anovulatory patients are more susceptible to GnRH antagonists and therefore demonstrate over-suppression of the pituitary. Older patients demonstrate a reduced pituitary response to GnRH antagonists than younger ones. Cycle scheduling with estradiol pretreatment did not influence LH decline, nor IVF treatment outcomes. Rambam Health Care Campus 2017-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5415367/ /pubmed/28467764 http://dx.doi.org/10.5041/RMMJ.10298 Text en © 2017 Segal et al. This is an open-access article. All its content, except where otherwise noted, is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Special Issue on Gynecology, Fertility, and Obstetrics
Segal, Linoy
Fainaru, Ofer
Kol, Shahar
Anovulatory Patients Demonstrate a Sharp Decline in LH Levels upon GnRH Antagonist Administration during IVF Cycles
title Anovulatory Patients Demonstrate a Sharp Decline in LH Levels upon GnRH Antagonist Administration during IVF Cycles
title_full Anovulatory Patients Demonstrate a Sharp Decline in LH Levels upon GnRH Antagonist Administration during IVF Cycles
title_fullStr Anovulatory Patients Demonstrate a Sharp Decline in LH Levels upon GnRH Antagonist Administration during IVF Cycles
title_full_unstemmed Anovulatory Patients Demonstrate a Sharp Decline in LH Levels upon GnRH Antagonist Administration during IVF Cycles
title_short Anovulatory Patients Demonstrate a Sharp Decline in LH Levels upon GnRH Antagonist Administration during IVF Cycles
title_sort anovulatory patients demonstrate a sharp decline in lh levels upon gnrh antagonist administration during ivf cycles
topic Special Issue on Gynecology, Fertility, and Obstetrics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5415367/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28467764
http://dx.doi.org/10.5041/RMMJ.10298
work_keys_str_mv AT segallinoy anovulatorypatientsdemonstrateasharpdeclineinlhlevelsupongnrhantagonistadministrationduringivfcycles
AT fainaruofer anovulatorypatientsdemonstrateasharpdeclineinlhlevelsupongnrhantagonistadministrationduringivfcycles
AT kolshahar anovulatorypatientsdemonstrateasharpdeclineinlhlevelsupongnrhantagonistadministrationduringivfcycles