Cargando…

Creating multithemed ecological regions for macroscale ecology: Testing a flexible, repeatable, and accessible clustering method

Understanding broad‐scale ecological patterns and processes often involves accounting for regional‐scale heterogeneity. A common way to do so is to include ecological regions in sampling schemes and empirical models. However, most existing ecological regions were developed for specific purposes, usi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cheruvelil, Kendra Spence, Yuan, Shuai, Webster, Katherine E., Tan, Pang‐Ning, Lapierre, Jean‐François, Collins, Sarah M., Fergus, C. Emi, Scott, Caren E., Henry, Emily Norton, Soranno, Patricia A., Filstrup, Christopher T., Wagner, Tyler
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5415510/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28480004
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2884
_version_ 1783233529959677952
author Cheruvelil, Kendra Spence
Yuan, Shuai
Webster, Katherine E.
Tan, Pang‐Ning
Lapierre, Jean‐François
Collins, Sarah M.
Fergus, C. Emi
Scott, Caren E.
Henry, Emily Norton
Soranno, Patricia A.
Filstrup, Christopher T.
Wagner, Tyler
author_facet Cheruvelil, Kendra Spence
Yuan, Shuai
Webster, Katherine E.
Tan, Pang‐Ning
Lapierre, Jean‐François
Collins, Sarah M.
Fergus, C. Emi
Scott, Caren E.
Henry, Emily Norton
Soranno, Patricia A.
Filstrup, Christopher T.
Wagner, Tyler
author_sort Cheruvelil, Kendra Spence
collection PubMed
description Understanding broad‐scale ecological patterns and processes often involves accounting for regional‐scale heterogeneity. A common way to do so is to include ecological regions in sampling schemes and empirical models. However, most existing ecological regions were developed for specific purposes, using a limited set of geospatial features and irreproducible methods. Our study purpose was to: (1) describe a method that takes advantage of recent computational advances and increased availability of regional and global data sets to create customizable and reproducible ecological regions, (2) make this algorithm available for use and modification by others studying different ecosystems, variables of interest, study extents, and macroscale ecology research questions, and (3) demonstrate the power of this approach for the research question—How well do these regions capture regional‐scale variation in lake water quality? To achieve our purpose we: (1) used a spatially constrained spectral clustering algorithm that balances geospatial homogeneity and region contiguity to create ecological regions using multiple terrestrial, climatic, and freshwater geospatial data for 17 northeastern U.S. states (~1,800,000 km(2)); (2) identified which of the 52 geospatial features were most influential in creating the resulting 100 regions; and (3) tested the ability of these ecological regions to capture regional variation in water nutrients and clarity for ~6,000 lakes. We found that: (1) a combination of terrestrial, climatic, and freshwater geospatial features influenced region creation, suggesting that the oft‐ignored freshwater landscape provides novel information on landscape variability not captured by traditionally used climate and terrestrial metrics; and (2) the delineated regions captured macroscale heterogeneity in ecosystem properties not included in region delineation—approximately 40% of the variation in total phosphorus and water clarity among lakes was at the regional scale. Our results demonstrate the usefulness of this method for creating customizable and reproducible regions for research and management applications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5415510
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54155102017-05-05 Creating multithemed ecological regions for macroscale ecology: Testing a flexible, repeatable, and accessible clustering method Cheruvelil, Kendra Spence Yuan, Shuai Webster, Katherine E. Tan, Pang‐Ning Lapierre, Jean‐François Collins, Sarah M. Fergus, C. Emi Scott, Caren E. Henry, Emily Norton Soranno, Patricia A. Filstrup, Christopher T. Wagner, Tyler Ecol Evol Original Research Understanding broad‐scale ecological patterns and processes often involves accounting for regional‐scale heterogeneity. A common way to do so is to include ecological regions in sampling schemes and empirical models. However, most existing ecological regions were developed for specific purposes, using a limited set of geospatial features and irreproducible methods. Our study purpose was to: (1) describe a method that takes advantage of recent computational advances and increased availability of regional and global data sets to create customizable and reproducible ecological regions, (2) make this algorithm available for use and modification by others studying different ecosystems, variables of interest, study extents, and macroscale ecology research questions, and (3) demonstrate the power of this approach for the research question—How well do these regions capture regional‐scale variation in lake water quality? To achieve our purpose we: (1) used a spatially constrained spectral clustering algorithm that balances geospatial homogeneity and region contiguity to create ecological regions using multiple terrestrial, climatic, and freshwater geospatial data for 17 northeastern U.S. states (~1,800,000 km(2)); (2) identified which of the 52 geospatial features were most influential in creating the resulting 100 regions; and (3) tested the ability of these ecological regions to capture regional variation in water nutrients and clarity for ~6,000 lakes. We found that: (1) a combination of terrestrial, climatic, and freshwater geospatial features influenced region creation, suggesting that the oft‐ignored freshwater landscape provides novel information on landscape variability not captured by traditionally used climate and terrestrial metrics; and (2) the delineated regions captured macroscale heterogeneity in ecosystem properties not included in region delineation—approximately 40% of the variation in total phosphorus and water clarity among lakes was at the regional scale. Our results demonstrate the usefulness of this method for creating customizable and reproducible regions for research and management applications. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5415510/ /pubmed/28480004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2884 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Cheruvelil, Kendra Spence
Yuan, Shuai
Webster, Katherine E.
Tan, Pang‐Ning
Lapierre, Jean‐François
Collins, Sarah M.
Fergus, C. Emi
Scott, Caren E.
Henry, Emily Norton
Soranno, Patricia A.
Filstrup, Christopher T.
Wagner, Tyler
Creating multithemed ecological regions for macroscale ecology: Testing a flexible, repeatable, and accessible clustering method
title Creating multithemed ecological regions for macroscale ecology: Testing a flexible, repeatable, and accessible clustering method
title_full Creating multithemed ecological regions for macroscale ecology: Testing a flexible, repeatable, and accessible clustering method
title_fullStr Creating multithemed ecological regions for macroscale ecology: Testing a flexible, repeatable, and accessible clustering method
title_full_unstemmed Creating multithemed ecological regions for macroscale ecology: Testing a flexible, repeatable, and accessible clustering method
title_short Creating multithemed ecological regions for macroscale ecology: Testing a flexible, repeatable, and accessible clustering method
title_sort creating multithemed ecological regions for macroscale ecology: testing a flexible, repeatable, and accessible clustering method
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5415510/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28480004
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2884
work_keys_str_mv AT cheruvelilkendraspence creatingmultithemedecologicalregionsformacroscaleecologytestingaflexiblerepeatableandaccessibleclusteringmethod
AT yuanshuai creatingmultithemedecologicalregionsformacroscaleecologytestingaflexiblerepeatableandaccessibleclusteringmethod
AT websterkatherinee creatingmultithemedecologicalregionsformacroscaleecologytestingaflexiblerepeatableandaccessibleclusteringmethod
AT tanpangning creatingmultithemedecologicalregionsformacroscaleecologytestingaflexiblerepeatableandaccessibleclusteringmethod
AT lapierrejeanfrancois creatingmultithemedecologicalregionsformacroscaleecologytestingaflexiblerepeatableandaccessibleclusteringmethod
AT collinssarahm creatingmultithemedecologicalregionsformacroscaleecologytestingaflexiblerepeatableandaccessibleclusteringmethod
AT ferguscemi creatingmultithemedecologicalregionsformacroscaleecologytestingaflexiblerepeatableandaccessibleclusteringmethod
AT scottcarene creatingmultithemedecologicalregionsformacroscaleecologytestingaflexiblerepeatableandaccessibleclusteringmethod
AT henryemilynorton creatingmultithemedecologicalregionsformacroscaleecologytestingaflexiblerepeatableandaccessibleclusteringmethod
AT sorannopatriciaa creatingmultithemedecologicalregionsformacroscaleecologytestingaflexiblerepeatableandaccessibleclusteringmethod
AT filstrupchristophert creatingmultithemedecologicalregionsformacroscaleecologytestingaflexiblerepeatableandaccessibleclusteringmethod
AT wagnertyler creatingmultithemedecologicalregionsformacroscaleecologytestingaflexiblerepeatableandaccessibleclusteringmethod